Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/02/18 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Ah, those great irrelevant memes. I wasn't aware anyone was opposing immigration. Why can't the lefties get it through their thick skulls that ILLEGALS are being opposed? It's the same difference as between an honorably discharged veteran and a military deserter. Deserters do not get veteran's benefits. And as to Ivana's citizenship, that usually follows the father - not the mother. I was surprised to learn that American women who married a foreign national once lost their citizenship! I discovered that when I ran across my grandfather's cousin applying to have her citizenship restored, since she was now a widow. She had been married to a Brit. This act apparently has ever been repealed, though it is just sort of ignored nowadays. "The Cable Act of 1922 (ch. 411, 42 Stat. 1021, "Married Women's Independent Nationality Act") was a United States federal law that reversed former immigration laws regarding marriage. (It is also known as the Married Women's Citizenship Act or the Women's Citizenship Act). Previously, a woman lost her US citizenship if she married a foreign man, since she assumed the citizenship of her husband, a law that did not apply to US citizen men who married foreign women. The law repealed sections 3 and 4 of the Expatriation Act of 1907." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Act
  2. 1 point
    My best friend in LA is a therapist and she was a rape counselor in school. This link reiterates what she has said to me about sexual assault. The victims don't recount exactly. Also, its the same in pretty much every event. Witnesses to a crime have "consistent" testimony but not "exactly matched" testimony. That said, she could have been making it up but the fact remains Republicans found her testimony credible. Finally, lets assume it didn't go down the way she said, the women they were lining up against Mueller weren't even there. Totally different context. They were paid to lie. The woman in the Kavanaugh matter wasn't. She and Kavanaugh knew each other and at a minimum can be placed in the same place. This other woman regarding Mueller, no. Not the same. There is an argument for either side, its not conclusive she wasn't assaulted. An argument can be made for both sides, but with the Mueller accusation it was a total 100 percent fabrication. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180926-myths-about-sexual-assault-and-rape-debunked
  3. 1 point
  4. 1 point