Jump to content

Hugh_Hoy

Board Sponsors
  • Posts

    5090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    120

Everything posted by Hugh_Hoy

  1. Now that's FUNNY: A lib talking about "ethics". HH
  2. No matter what the court says, as long as the GOP controls the House, Obamacare is merely gonna gather dust, cuz it ain't gonna get funded. :content: HH
  3. I've seriously been thinking about Reno. No state income tax :content: Housing market is depressed almost as much as the Central Valley...lots of foreclosures=good deals. Oregon...thought about that also. No sales tax, but high property taxes and (worse of all)run by commies...I mean, uh, er, "progressives" 55555555. Golden Corral or Roadhouse might be the tie-breakers. Not sure if the casino buffets are still the bargains they used to be. I don't think so, based on an experience a few years back. Sadly, it doesn't appear that you'd get any (or much of a) break registering a vehicle over there. Flash...Baja isn't much different than from where I'm living now. I'd just be paying "taxes" to the local and policia de estado baja instead. HH
  4. How do you figure we're STILL paying for it? OMG, that was 30 years ago ! Chump change compared to what Obama is leaving you. You want to know why I stay in Cali? Cuz if I moved I'd miss you too mutt. HH
  5. Surfers from Seal Beach to San Diego rock! :content: Unfortunately, the migrant workers immigrate. HH
  6. I think Arnie tried to do the right thing. But his own words were, "this state is not governable". I agree. If I was 30 years old, I'd get out of the state as quickly as I could, coming back only to transit LAX or SFO. Yeah, Brown is experienced. A career politician. But he has broken his oath of office more than once. So going back on his campaign rhetoric will be no more painful to him than it is to the average politician. HH (Wishing that CA would divide up into two states, leaving most of the coastal counties in one state and the rest of the counties in another.)
  7. Steve, Steve, Steve...how can you come to this conclusion? Just look at his agenda and what he wants to accomplish: higher taxes, higher spending levels, national healthcare, repeal of federal law relating to same-sex marriage, repeal of "don't ask, don't tell", amnesty to illegal aliens, sympathetic siding with unions...I could tick off a few more as examples, but you get the drift. What is "centrist" with respect to any of his positions on above? That he hasn't offered up free weddings to same-sex partners or free housing and food stamps to wetbacks? The only thing that has caused Obama to inch ever so slightly to the center was the butt-kicking of the Demoncrap Party a couple of months ago. And that movement toward the center has only involved the current tax increase pending. So, pleeeeeeeease don't call Obama's politics "centrist". It just ain't so. HH
  8. What alleged damage did Reagan do that we are still paying for? I hope you aren't going to blame him for California's yearly fiscal crisis that the Demoncrap legislature has spearheaded for decades. HH
  9. If I could pay my federal taxes based upon what I support or don't support, I could probably cut my taxes by at least 80%. On the other hand, if one doesn't want to pay more taxes, it is much easier to not vote for a Demoncrat. :content: HH
  10. I regretfully admit I'm not in the top 1% But plenty of others that are likewise disadvantaged share my view that taxes should not be raised on anyone. One of the polls I read revealed that 20% of the respondents thought the same. I suspect that the great majority of those who wanted to raise the taxes on the top 1-2% don't pay ANY federal income taxes. My reasons are simple: I don't believe that the average TAXPAYER really gets good value for his $. We are taxed too much for what we individually receive; Everybody should pay the same percentage of their gross income (from whatever source); I don't have a right to what my neighbors earn/own, they don't have a reciprocal claim. It's a moral issue to me. And it's not just the income tax the Demoncrats want to raise (as we all know). Among others, they want to raise the "death tax". Bunch of fucking grave robbers, in my eyes. You could bury them in one of those big piles of cow shit I see next to dairy's and it would be fine by me. :content: HH
  11. HOUSE DEMONCRATS AGAIN SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT. Talk about a gang that can't shoot straight. 55555555555555555 The libs in the Demoncrat Party seem to sense their demise in 2012...their final "finger" to the American taxpayer/voters will be a HUGE tax increase across the board. People will have less to spend, which will translate to fewer meals in restaurants, fewer shopping trips to the stores, fewer purchases of hard goods. That, in turn, will be more people laid off of the employment rolls and onto the unemployment rolls. What a bunch of ignorant, stupid people the libs put in office. 5555555555 Actually, it isn't funny. It's really sad. Even The One can't talk sense to members of his own party !!!! "Lame Duck" Congress? Nah. It's not lame. It's putrid. And the price will be paid. But liberalism will finally be dead and buried in two more long years. HH
  12. Funny thing' date=' he was acquitted of that![/quote'] And OJ was acquited of homicide :content: I think Acockasian was basically replying to your question as to whether or not a President had testified; not whether the testimony was true or false or perjurous. Maybe if he'd just left off the lying part, the question would have been answered to your satisfaction. (I'd forgotten all about Paula Jones; I'd have done her, given the opportunity.) HH
  13. Ronnie pulled what? He pulled off getting the hostages released...something Carter hadn't done in 444 days ! The only lawsuits filed by actual hostages (vs. "If I had been") have been against Iran/Assets of Iran. And, to my knowledge, the U.S. Government has consistently opposed successful prosecution of those lawsuits. So, if the hostages had credible evidence that Reagan was complicit of some nefarious activity which extended their captivity, don't you think we would have heard it...and don't you think they would have gone after him/his estate? (After all, he was a private citizen when some might believe he acted against their best wishes.) Like I said: "allegations"/"charges". Easy to make. HH P.S. LZ and OH...please keep this shit under your tin hats, or we'll be subjected to another Oliver Stone "classic". :content:
  14. He got fucked by Ray-Gun and the GOP on that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise#1980_Carter_vs._Reagan Tin hat stuff, LK. Tin hat stuff. Built on "allegations" and "charges", but "where's the beef"? Carter lost cuz he was a lamer. HH
  15. Perfect weather for Obama to take a short flight...maybe on an unmanned vehicle? HH
  16. Lucky dog. 2 trips in 6 months. BTW, where did you score that stunner I saw you escort into Shark one night? Absolutely radiated class, beauty, and high maintenance. 5555555555 HH
  17. At least you could score a Happy Meal back then. HH
  18. If you are referring to the "Relationships" sub-formum, I emphatically reject that suggestion. That sub-forum is for lamers who possess the need to bare their grief suffered as a result of bargirl relationships that go south. In contrast, a U.S.A. forum would discuss only the most serious matters with genuine national and international implications for all U.S. citizens...like, er, uh, cell-phone-jamming devices installed in automobiles and outlawing toys being included with McDonald's Happy Meals. HH
  19. So how far do you think the Federal government should go to intrude into people's lives? Should the Secretary of Health require that any welfare recipient who already has two kids have their tubes cut? Makes more sense to me than making cars more expensive and invading another right of a State to decide issues like this. Once again, the libtards' motos "I'm ok, your ok" and "if it feels good, do it" only apply to what they think is "ok" and "good". Fucking jerks. HH (hoping that somebody in D.C. follows LaHood around and films him talking on his cell phone while driving. :content: ) HH
  20. OK PERV...I'll give this a try and see if your idea has legs. Here we go again, with fuckin' libtards in Washington now proposing to require new cars be outfitted with a device that would make cell phones inoperable. WTF is this about? 1. It is NOT something the federal government has any fucking business dictating. 2. What if a passenger in the car wants to use a cell phone? What if there is an emergency that the driver should know about? The fucking Secretary of Transportation is just another example of a liberal trying to get involved in everybody's business. Honestly: libs need to be deported or shot. They fuck up the gene pool. HH
  21. So you won't get pissed off or be disappointed if I start another "fuck Obama" thread? HH
  22. Perv...I think it's high time that those of us from the US authenticate our arrogance and "don't give a fuck what others think" attitude and demand our own sub-forum. Further, demand that it be a "USA members-only" deal, so we can gossip about the others...and hope that Wikileaks doesn't publish our rants for others to view. HH
  23. So we're gonna have to do our rants and comments in a USA ghetto? HH
×
×
  • Create New...