Jump to content

Hugh_Hoy

Board Sponsors
  • Posts

    5090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    120

Posts posted by Hugh_Hoy

  1. Flash: About the only thing I use CBS for is sports. If it was a newspaper, I'd put it on a spool in the bathroom. Last night's "debate" was a rare exception.

     

    Re Coulter: the left has historically emphasized the use of personal attacks, mud-slinging, and anarchism to justify advancement of it's dogma. The Coulter/Cain episodes are just examples. The OWS movement is another. If I were dictator, all of those protesters who felt the need to cover their faces with masks would be the first ones with targets on their chests. (I mean it; fuck em).

     

    Steveo...Obama missed a Golden Opportunity to help overturn/change Iran a couple of years ago. Remember the "Green movement"? Where was Obama then? Having some fucking "beer summit" in the White House backyard? Almost every place in the ME that Obama has inserted his fucking nose has resulted in detriment of Western culture or dubious advancement of ME peace. Suggesting that Israel move back to the 1967 borders; encouraging the ousting of Mubarak so that the more radical Islamists can take over; supporting the Libyan rebels with the likely same result; calling out Assad in Syria with another likely anti-U.S. result. You can't be serious that Obama would support/take any...even "covert"...action against a Muslim country hostile to the U.S. The fucker's middle name is "Hussein", for God's sake !!! Where, now, is "The One" who was gonna sweet talk all of our adversaries in the ME and around the world...you know, the bullshit campaign talk that got him the Nobel Peace Prize?

     

    Your guy is a TOTAL fucking loser !!!

     

    HH

  2. On FOIA, Obama wants a license to lie

     

     

    It's not often that the liberal American Civil Liberties Union and conservative Judicial Watch agree on anything, but the Obama administration's lack of transparency has brought the two together. My link :stirthepo

     

    And 4 years ago,in how many ads and campaign appearances did Barry look into the camera and audiences and lie to us about how his administration was going to be the most transparent, not give access to lobbyists, blah, blah, blah?

     

    HH

  3. ..credit to Obama for including rational, qualified people of either party to high posts.

     

    Ah...more jibberish from a pod somewhere in libtardland. :neener:

     

    For what it's worth, I agree with you on the above. To which I'd add, probably the ONLY rational, qualified person he's appointed. 55555555555

     

    HH

  4. Anyway, Republicans don't want Obama to pass anything so he'll get the blame. I still believe that.

     

    And he would be in line to get mucho blame if he were able to pass the stuff he wants to. And it would be well-deserved. :neener: I'd love to give him enough rope to hang himself. Problem is, he would set the country on a course from which it might never recover.

     

    The country just cannot afford 4 more years of this Marxist-traitor. Was it Khruchev (sp?) who said that the commies would win from "within". Well, Obama is just a Trojan horse being presented by Pelosi, Reid and some others. McCarthy would have a field day with these pieces of shit. HH

  5. Without trying to seem biased, the Republicans aren't compromising. It seems only one side is compromising and has been.

     

    Look Steve...pleeeeeeeeeeze stop with the standard-issue libtard rhetoric. The GOPers HAVE offered compromises; that is, agreed to some of the elements in Obama's proposed legislation. Now, if compromise means not getting all of what the Marxist-in-Chief wants, too friggin' bad. I think it's safe to say that Obama would like to tax the "wealthy" 80% if he thought that he could. Then, it would be equally safe to say he would offer a "compromise" at 79% and the libtards, if the GOP refused to accept that, would say the GOP refuses to compromise. Please be aware that even some Senate Demoncraps refuse to vote for Obama's "jobs bill". Otherwise, it would have been passed in the Senate. As it stands now, Harry Reid won't even bring Obama's proposed legislation to the floor for a vote, cuz he knows he doesn't have the votes to pass it. In the meantime, the House has passed many bills and sent them to the Senate. What does Reid do? The fuckstick puts them on the shelf. They don't even get hearings. Now, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze tell me who is obstructing who?

     

    HH

  6. Am I being deluded or have my eyes opened?

     

     

    Stevo...go OWS (Occupy Walking Street) Capitalism at it's rawest and finest. (And pleeeeeeze, for your own inner-self, stay away from "move on. org". "Just say no.") Nothing good there. :biggrin:

     

    HH

  7. I read an article recently saying that Cain has no real network or organization in states. Not sure if its true and this may be Democrats being naughty but I've heard it said he's running for President to sell his book and make money hence his lack of organization, etc.

     

    In his business life he's been very well organized and prepared. However, his lack of knowledge on certain foreign policy issues as well as other issues suggests to me the possibility he didn't take it seriously.

     

    What commie blog did you get that from? 555555555555 I think it's true that he doesn't have the network/resources that traditionally are employed in the primaries. Comes from not being in the political arena before. As for campaigning to sell a book? Crazy idea. He makes enough from his investments and his previous radio talk show. Anybody who wants to run for Prez almost MUST write a book. I've already started mine for my 2020 run. ;)

     

    HH

  8. Frankly, I don't like when blacks do this he or she isn't black enough tihng and I don't like seeing it involved in an election.

     

    I'm thinking that this type of characterization is a "black thing". That is, limited to the black community. The first time I heard blacks put some kind of emphasis on the shades of "blackness" was when I taught at Markham (104th and Compton). I'd hear kids say to others, "yo sho is black. You as black as ....". It seemed that the more black another was, the lower on the totem pole one was. I also heard the use of the "N word" a lot. I was pretty sure that in both cases, there was an amount of "joking around" involved, cuz nobody died as a result. 55555555555 Kind of like calling a good friend an a-hole when you found out years later that he was dating "my girl" at the same time I was. LOL.

     

    One thing that puzzles me: If a person is a mulatto (Barry), why is he referred to as "black"? He has just as much "white blood" in him as "black blood". :dunno: Like you said, when it comes to U.S. politics, the amount of "American" a person reflects should be much more important than the amount of light a person reflects.

     

    HH

  9. For the Criminal cases the Judge has accepted preliminary evidence from my lawyer and I have a hearing set for late November to present evidence, she does not have to attend but if not it is her only chance to defend herself against the charges and if the court accepts the evidence there will be a warrant issued for her.

     

    Criminal case? Don't recall that. What's that about?

     

    HH

  10. ... Next thing you know they'll be saying he wasn't born in the U.S. :grinyes:

     

    5555555555555555555 I agree that anybody who wants to be President has to be "nuts". First, 2 years of trying to get nominated by shaking hands, kissing babies, sleeping in different hotels almost every night, meetings and fund-raisers several times per week, trying to catch up on even the most basic stuff that you might be questioned about at any time, taking flack from some quarter over almost anything you might say. A candidate must be absolutely driven by ego, a feeling of a "calling" and/or selling his/her soul to the devil. On top of it all, you have some "shrink" trying to psychoanalyze you who has probably never even spent 30 minutes talking to you. 55555555555555 Then, if you are successful in getting the nomination and being elected, you spend the next two years in office without having a private life, followed by two more years campaigning all over again to get re-elected. :doah:

     

    Steverino...I think your transformation into a neo-libtard has been completed. Above, you link a "party" to Franklin's book; you've (intentionally or unintentionally)over-reached only in a way that a libtard could do. :banghead: The book has nothing to do with "party". Didn't the same author do a number on GWB?

     

    HH

    Long Live The Tea Party !!!

  11. "The country got a 350 credit rating.." haha...I knew guys like this. Street guys and smart and had common sense.

     

    Yeah funny. Would be a lot funnier if it wasn't true. I'm sure we all wish we had our own printing press like the Treasury. Between the Treasury and Fed, it's one big check-kiting scheme. One of these days, it's gonna come down like a ton of bricks. Think Greece. Of course, there are politicians who either think it can't happen here or don't give a hoot. The T Party (the greatest thing to happen in this country since the election of Ike (55555555)) has only 3 or 4 basic planks: Conserve the letter/meaning of the Constitution as written/amended; limit taxation; limited Federal government; and balance the damn budget. Pretty simple. People who don't understand that gotta be even more "simple".

     

    HH

  12. PS: it is absolutely fascinating to see how the Tea Party, which has just 20% support among US voters, is able to force the GOP candidates to take more and more radical right wing positions - it shows how powerful the right wing foundations, think tanks, media, corporations are already are. They control and drive the conservative discourse almost 100%.

     

    The Tea Party doesn't address social issues, so no surprise that you seem to dislike it. If you take time to read the very small list of things which are dear to the Tea Party, you will find those things to have been equally important by the "founding fathers". We have, in Obama, a neo-fuhrer who has attempted to tear up our Constitution and tear down the protections guaranteed by that document. (BTW, your percentages don't make sense, based upon the percentages of the population declaring themselves Demoncrap or Republican.) Also, our mainstream media(major newspapers and TV networks) are decidedly liberal.

     

    HH

  13. However, I don't see a President but a head of a department in the administration. Someplace he can run like a corporation where he's the boss.

     

    I guess you can call "stubborness" a committment to your beliefs. That is different than "intolerance", for sure. I see in Obama both. Maybe Paul would make Cain the head of the Fed. 55555555555

     

    Interesting article someplace on Yahoo "news". Claimed that a composite of "Newtcain" for President would be big, big trouble for Obama. jing jing (Of course, I'd vote for Joe the Plumber over Barry. Big news, no? 5555555555555) Seriously, Newt has vastly more experience overall applicable to leading the country and extremely knowledgable regarding (particularly) foreign affairs. Cain, as VP, would be expotentially an improvement over Biden. I mean, WTF has Biden contributed to the country. I know not his fault that there haven't been any foreign heads of state who have died; accordingly, no funerals to attend on behalf of the country. But he has been given the "lead" on important initiatives by the WH and nothing was ever really produced.

     

    The GOP may be fortunate or unfortunate this time around. But it is certainly blessed with having 4 or 5 potential nominees much, much better for the country than Obama. Obama has attempted to divide the country by "class"; demonizing those who have achieved success and attempting to reward laggards with the fruits of others' labors. He's a fucking Marxist. And, for those with religious backgrounds, I can easily see a viewpoint that he is an "anti-Christ" and a "devil's diciple".

     

    HH

  14. I also see too much social conservatism for my liking.

     

     

    Steve...the man, in any capacity, would bring LEADERSHIP--something that hasn't been coming from the WH during this administration. Too much "social conservatism". I'm not sure what you mean by that. Have examples of what he's said that makes you feel that way? (I'm asking as a "social moderate".) The guy is definitely a leader; I'd guess leading by "consensous"; knows when to "kick ass" and when to give a pat on the back. I think most U.S. voters have seen what a "social LIBERAL" has done to the country in the last 2 3/4 years...NOTHING GOOD !

     

    BTW, you don't think Barry consults "experts" on stuff he doesn't know about? If he doesn't, that would explain a lot of things. 555555555555555555 (Maybe Barry just needs a new dart board or Magic 8 Ball".)

     

    HH

  15. .

     

    The scary thing about Cheney though is that he believes in his and the administrations actions with religious zealotry. That's what is scary about him. Someone so willing to forego the constitution and do what he thought was the right thing when it was so obviously the wrong thing.

     

    Substitute the name Cheney with Obama and I agree with you 100%

     

    HH

×
×
  • Create New...