Jump to content

chocolat steve

Board Sponsors
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by chocolat steve

  1. Hey Coss, Another thing I can't logically get my head around. QAnon said there are far left child trafficking pedo rings, right? But Trump has wished Epstein's girl pimp luck and Trump cuck Gaetz who Trump supported has been banging more 17 year old girls than the captain of my HS football team. I'm confused. How can QAnon explain this? Is Gaetz banging underage girls a false flag...flag being the optimum word.
  2. Actually its an easy call. All things being equal, the next determinant is ethnicity/gender, etc.
  3. 20 years late to it but at least its getting what seems to be its proper attention. I hope its in earnest. https://www.yahoo.com/news/13-investigations-no-court-martials-120018004.html
  4. One of the few things, or rather rare things I fully backed Trump on was his wanting to pull American troops out of war zones globally. He was stymied by BOTH parties because they have a vested interest in keeping the war going. History has told us it wears a nation out. The Romans did it and it was one of a few major reasons their empire fell. Biden is committed to a hard date. September 11th. Apropos. People are saying "We can't or the Taliban will take over". My answer is "So the fuck what?" They were there before we went in and were it not for them housing bin Laden we would have let them stay there. Bitch and moan about it but not commit troops. I am for limiting our presence on the ground in NATO as well as Korea. Russia is not going to attack a Euro nation. Lets put that bullshit theory to bed. Ukraine used to be theirs. I don't like that they went in, I am fully for keeping them out of G8 and punishing them diplomatically and economically. But its a somewhat "internal" fight if we take history into account. As far as Russia advancing on Germany, Holland, etc, it won't happen in a million years. They will try to re-secure their influence in the former Soviet Bloc nations as a buffer like before but as far as EU proper, nothing to worry about militarily. Russia will interfere electronically, economically if it can or politically but physically? Nah. They won't. Same to a lesser extent in North Korea. We had about 28k or so stationed there. I'd reduce that to 5k. North Korea is NOT going to invade the south. It's an unwinnable war and the China is dead set against it. Why? Because it would be giving America a great excuse to be on their door step in huge numbers. Americans are more worried about North Korea invading than the South Koreans are.
  5. Jesus loves him https://www.yahoo.com/news/liberty-sues-jerry-falwell-jr-162325226.html
  6. Looks like Congressman Matt Jailbaetz is going down. Coss, why no comment about him? Hmm....Biden is worse than Max Jailbaetz? Fox News had only 1 thing about him on Tucker Carlson who he pissed off. This is huge. Why isn't Fox News reporting on it? Why is non elected and private citizen Hunter Biden the center of attention? I'm scratching my head as to why. I mean a sitting Congressman is buying and banging girls underage girls. That's not newsworthy? Are they going to try and deflect that Clinton banged women? Adult women? That he broke no laws except the laws of God. 😁 If you in for that sort of thing. I am the son of a baptist Deacon so I have to ask.
  7. Two things are keeping the Republicans a force Coss. First, their willingness to do literally anything to win. Their willingness to violate any ethical, moral or even legal standards. They see their fight as a fight for survival literally and practice politics as such. Second is the shockingly inept Democrats. They have the numbers but are themselves corrupt and beholden to groups that hurt their turnout at the polls by siding with them. Medicare for all is a no brainer. Big Pharma and the whole medical industry are against it. They have bought both sides. There are just as many struggling Republican voters out there with all kinds of maladies as there are Democrats. There are just as many Republican voters who know they are one medical emergency away from insolvency. They won't put up a fight. Polls say the same. Democratic leadership won't do it because of who they get their money from. That issue is also one of the reasons they fear AOC and her like minded representatives of getting power. They have no problem enacting it. The Democratic leadership fears the money will dry up. AOC, Omar and the rest don't take money from big donors. On the right, those who are true believers in what the party say they stand for: high morals, small government, etc. have no place in the party. They won't do what it takes to win such as brazenly lie or adjust their views and morals accordingly.
  8. I like her in part of how she pisses off the right for just existing. It's funny seeing them go overboard about a young woman just starting out in her political career. The 'crazy bitch' is the Georgia female congresswoman talking about lasers from the skies starting California forest fires and a QAnon supporter. She is truly a dumbass. She's been on tape not knowing basic middle school government civics. She actually thought it was against the law to be sworn in on anything but a bible. Stupid shit like that. You don't hear anything about that do you? The right will back any crazy bitch as long as its their crazy bitch. Hypocrisy of the highest order.
  9. Coss, (and others), I'll explain the over the top vitriol towards AOC. Even before she set foot in Congress the right wing went at her as if she nailed Christ to the cross. Why? They are scared shitless of her. She took down the 2nd ranking Democrat in Congress. She's young, attractive, fiery, smart, Latina and she won without any big lobby money. That is scary as hell to both parties actually. The Democratic leadership fear her as much as well. She can't be bought, has strong convictions and is a future (and now present) star. Republicans see a future threat who can get the female vote, black and latino vote, young vote and siphon off some Republican votes. They are trying to nip it in the bud. Freshman representatives have no power. Whatever committee assignments they get are at the whim of the head of the party. So, the vitriol is way out of step with the norm. What made her different is that she was heralded and even Pelosi had to negotiate with her (and others like Omar) because the public, millions outside her district liked her a lot. What you smell is abject fear. So, they go after her with everything they got to "kill her" rhetorically speaking while she is knew. Take away the future threat. Many Congresspersons speak on the border. Almost all their comments are unnoticed and have no national following. Before she set foot in Congress AOC's twitter account went up hundreds of thousands. That's scary as hell to both parties. The Democratic establishment fear her because she is not beholden to the same people/companies they are. She's truly independent. That's not acceptable. The Republicans see a potential president. She would do a lot of damage in the swing states. And...she would greatly threaten red / purple states that have a large latino population: Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and the biggest prize of all Texas. She would presumably get the black vote. She would get the young vote (18-30) easily and she would presumably get more of the female vote than Dems usually get. She scares them both her ideology and potential power. So you are smelling fear. She is no Hillary Clinton. The right wing is desperately trying to paint her in such a way. But she's not. Think about. Why should anyone care what she thinks about the border. All she represents is her NY district. She is not part of the Democratic leadership. What Pelosi says about the border or anything else matters. What any member of the leadership says matters because they have the votes. The rank and file pretty much go along with what they say. AOC isn't part of the leadership and can't tell the rank and file what to do. What she does have is her immense popularity across many groups. So, the posts you see on here are basically projecting abject fear.
  10. Not as extreme, but complaining about Biden is like a former party member complaining about Adenaur in post WW2 Germany...lol. No matter what his faults are, he's infinitely better than who came prior.
  11. Glad you asked (lol). In every state that has loose, relaxed gun laws such as open carry especially but also concealed weapons in public gun laws this is what I would propose. In open carry states especially, get as many Moslem, Black and Latino gun clubs as possible. Have them all open carry. And the same in concealed weapon states, make it known they are carrying concealed guns. I guarantee you 100 percent Republicans will pass gun restrictions. California had open carry until the Black Panthers did it in the late 60s. Then Republican governor Ronald Reagan (Yes, 'that' Ronald Reagan) with the full blessing of the NRA, outlawed open carry as a result. 😁. What I would propose for safety of these groups is they tell the local police they are forming it and make it known so that they aren't targeted and if they are sue the f*ck out of them. So, go completely the other direction. Let them have to walk around with a guy in a thobe (That arab thingy they wear) with an AK 47 over his shoulder in Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, South Carolina, Kentucky (all open carry, there are more). Trust me on this, you'd see the laws toughened dramatically. The Republicans and 2nd amendment people want no gun restrictions for themselves in actuality. Not for anyone else they hate/fear.
  12. Coss, I could get Republicans to go for a complete overhaul of the 2nd amendment very easily. Its so simple.
  13. I'm all for the 2nd amendment. I've owned one. However, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, gang members, mafia of all sorts have guns illegally. It's a massive problem. I'm not saying the Democrats have the right plan. However, the Republicans want to do nothing about it except lock up people after they have committed a crime instead of working to get the guns out of their hands. The last time the Republicans backed any kind of gun control was when one of their own got shot (Brady and Reagan). Until then they didn't give two shits because it was happening in certain areas away from themselves. The response these days in mass shooting is give everyone a gun. Except.....well, I won't go there or I'll be accused of something.
  14. https://ssl-adh.ark.org/images/uploads/pdf/RESOURCE_-_ID_Requirements_-_ENGLISH.pdf These are all accepted at various agencies as legitimate. Many people have gotten ballots in various states based on them. Again, I have zero issues with one all inclusive ID for voting IF WE GET IT FOR THEM FOR FREE. If you are living on food stamps and in public housing and are elderly, its a huge burden to get an ID to vote in elections you have been voting in for decades. The Republicans are full of shit. Putting undue burden on thousands of people without a good reason. Solving a non existent problem.
  15. a list of IDs the federal government accepts but not the state of Georgia. https://idcard.uiowa.edu/policies/approved-government-photo-id-list Individuals must present a valid (not expired), approved form of government issued photo ID. Please Note - All forms of ID must be the original, physical document. We will not accept photocopies or a photo of an ID on a mobile device. Approved Forms of Government Issued Photo ID: Non-Driver Photo ID (Issued within U.S. including U.S. Territories) U.S. Passport U.S. Passport Card U.S. Military ID Card U.S. Military Dependent's ID Card Tribal Card
  16. A few things. I just heard Biden speak on gun violence and the need for enforcing gun laws. He sounded coherent and spoke well. This whole narrative he is incoherent is bullshit. You can't be incoherent in one speech and be coherent others. The guy is not a great public speaker. And if he's not, then who is in charge. You never hear that. You know who was totally out of it? Reagan in his last year or so in office. It's fact, Nancy was the de facto President. She would essentially be the chief of staff and say "Ron wants to do this and that'. There are videos of her under her breath telling him what to answer. Reagan was an actor so easy for him to play the role. A year after he was out of office he gave a deposition on Iran Contra and it was obvious he was completely gone. Alzheimers had set in while he was in office. That was obvious. As for ID's for voting. I'll pose a logical question to those outside America. How do you suppose someone without an ID get to vote in the first place? Really, think about it. How do you get on the voting rolls? How do you get a ballot? You don't. LOL. You had to do something to prove who are you to get a ballot in the first place. Think about that? Here's what these memes don't say and they are deliberately misleading. All people who have a ballot have an ID. It's impossible to be in America and get anything without some proof of who you are. How do you go to the bank and get money? If you are on public assistance how do you get it? How do you go to the office and get info on anything? You can't. What the states are doing are asking for one specific ID that many people do not have. America has no national ID save for a passport. 20% max have one. What the state of Georgia is doing is saying, we don't want YOUR id. And you, who have voted for all previous elections as an adult, with no issues, no dispute you are who you are, must now get THIS ID if you want to continue. My father no longer has a driver's license as I've said. He is not able to drive. My mum has to drive him anywhere. He's had a ballot mailed to him for years. If he were in Georgia, he would have to go through undue hardship to vote again. That's what's in debate. The question you have to ask is "Why is Georgia now requiring additions to voting for people WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN VOTING AND THERE IS NO DISPUTE ITS WHO THEY ARE?". That is the question our friends on this thread will not answer. Is it rampant voter fraud? No. Hmm....Georgia is spending tax payer money to solve a non existent issue? Again, I have no issues with the concept of one all inclusive ID. Even though various governments on the city, state and federal agencies offer IDs with photos. All well and good. But if you know and this is proven fact, that thousands of voters will be disenfranchised, why not make sure those that don't have it get it BEFORE you require it? Doesn't that make more sense? Isn't the state supposed to encourage voting? Isn't the state supposed to also make it easier to vote. Voter fraud is an extreme occurrence so maintaining the integrity of election is easy enough. Its guarding against the future occurrence perhaps of voter fraud. Okay, weak reason but if we are going to go there, then make sure everyone has it at the state's expense for requiring people like my parents, like my eldest Vietnam vet brother who has a photo ID issued by a government agency but wouldn't be allowed to get the next ballot despite voting for years. The reasoning of the Republicans is bullshit and its obvious why. Far, far more Democrats will not be able to comply than Republicans. Its a numbers game by a party that most Americans disagree with. They have to enact new ways of winning because they can't win a majority of the people. Here's an interesting factoid. Since 1992 Republicans have been in the White House 12 years and have only gotten the most popular votes ONCE. None of them have won the election with the most popular vote. NONE. That's why you see them cling onto the electoral college like oxygen needed to live. It's why you see the constant gas lighting, memes, etc. They are a dying party and will literally do anything including sedition to get power.
  17. Republican definition of a 'race baiter'. "If something affects you because you are black and you talk about it". 😁
  18. lol...some of those same countries have a fee if you DON'T vote. Selective. Also, again and again again, there have more sightings of UFOs than voter fraud. There more sightings of Elvis, Tupac and Big Foot than voter fraud. And again, again and again, besides solving a non existent problem. Why don't we make sure those that don't have the ID get it before requiring it? Because they don't want to. The link speaks for itself, hasn't been refuted because they can't. The hard truth is Republicans are dying. Gen Y and Z are more left than any previous generation on average. Red states are either now blue or becoming blue. Before 1992 California actually voted Republican regularly. Virginia as well. Now we see Georgia, Arizona went blue and are now officially swing states. N. Carolina is a swing state. These were all solid red states. I actually think the Republicans are going to be okay. Gaslighting works.
  • Create New...