BSTaucer Posted March 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Sir, You have deliberately plagerized and misquoated my post! I shall have non of it then, and I shall demand satisfaction! You sir are no gentleman, I bid you GOOD DAY SIR! With no Regard-BST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khun_Kong Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Arai wa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilAnders Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Khun_Kong said:Arai wa? re: {arai wa} Arai na? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilAnders Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Moo Noi Said "When a Thai says "Arai wa" it is slang, and they are basically saying "what the fuck?" or words to that effect. You should NEVER use this with a Thai you don't know, and even be careful using it with friends and bar girls as some might take offense. "Arai na" is an abbreviation of "arai na khrup/ka" and literally translated is similar to "pardon me?" or "sorry I didn't hear that". You can use "arai na" with friends and aquaitances etc., but if talking to a stranger or someone more "senior" than you, you should always put "khrup" on the end." Now I understand. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khun_Kong Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Just so there's no misunderstandings- "Arai wa" is a reference to one of our esteemed board members, who posted under that name. Clever stuff, as are Tosser's posts. Sounds vaguely similar, so I was just wondering if it might be from the same person. I could have just as well said "Scarfman? Scarfman_II? DaScarfMan? If it is the same person...clever stuff and good to hear from you again! If it's not the same person... still clever stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilAnders Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 I was wondering about the nuance. I first asked here, then thought better of it and asked in the language thread. To clarify my original question in this thread, I put in Moo Noi's treatise here, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamui Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 BSTaucer said: "less than successful." "capitulated" with the yanks, work. He of course was defeated, and present at the surrender. As our lineage has spread to other countries, you shall no doubt find Wangers and Taucers in governments through out the world. Hopefully your relatives don't fight in Iraq currently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chillers Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 From 1 newb 2 another... Welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BSTaucer Posted March 20, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2006 Khun_Kong, You shall first notice I have chosen to omit the word "Sir" from my usual salutation. This is a direct result of your use of the very offensive "Arai *WA*" in a previous post. I am more than certain that you were aware of the insultant nature of this word, yet chose to use it anyway. Furthermore, you took a previous post of mine, essentially plagerized it, changing a few words here and there, yet still attributed it to me, and had a run with it! This is most unacceptable, hence to call, I shall now be forced to demand a formal apology from you! Failing that, I shall demand satisfaction! I have given you the call man! I shall expect you to perform your obligation in said mention! My apologies to the ladies and proper Gentlemen of this net board, but this upstart has given me a raucous. Best Regards-BST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilAnders Posted March 20, 2006 Report Share Posted March 20, 2006 BSTaucer said:Khun_Kong, You shall first notice I have chosen to omit the word "Sir" from my usual salutation. This is a direct result of your use of the very offensive "Arai *WA*" in a previous post. I am more than certain that you were aware of the insultant nature of this word, yet chose to use it anyway. Dear Mr. BS Taucer, If you would allow me to comment, Sir: After I read Moo Noi's detailed explanation of {arai wa v. arai na} (kop khun kop- Moo Noi!) I also considered this to be a direct insult to another new member-- YOU. This was quickly (within five or ten minutes of my brief question) addressed by Kong "to avoid any mis-understanding" Notwithstanding kong's assumption that you, BS Taucer, was someone else, his statements that the posts are clever, nor his IMHO I empathize with you, Sir. That would be my::: Cheers. Philandering Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.