Mark Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 I just spent the last hour talking to Arab about his sexploits in BKK. Now, he is convinced he's not gay despite shagging ladyboys and playing with their peckers. As far as my side of the arguement went, this guy is as queer as a bottle of chips. If he wakes up with a cock next to him, he's a batty boy. What do you reckon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Himmaparn Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 What reasoning equates a preference for peckers over pussies with not being gay? Isn't that what defines male homosexuality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 If he also fucks women he cannot be gay, that's called bisexual. I have also heard from many guys who have wanted to try ladyboys and I don't consider them gay at all. But fucking a truck driver who has a beard but is wearing a skirt and lipstick, that's gay I haven't tried a ladyboy and probably never will but I've seen some so stunning and feminine ones that it would be easy to go wrong especially if they already have their cock removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Dumsoda, Old Hippie, Munchie and Teddy *ALL* tell me that you're only gay if you "take" it. If you're just a "giver", then you can't be gay. Oh... any guy who wears oven-mitts is gay too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carew66 Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Ladyboys are not fags (as per the thread title). Benson and Hedges are fags. As are L and M. I have woken up with them many a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 I haven't tried a ladyboy and probably never will but I've seen some so stunning and feminine ones that it would be easy to go wrong especially if they already have their cock removed. This is true. Haven't gone wrong myself yet, but plenty have. Gay = homosexuality, which means having sex with someone of the same gender. i.e. Man plus a man. So yes, biologically speaking when a guy has sex with a ladyboy he is engaging in a homosexual act. Does it "make" him gay? I don't think so. It does mean he's had a gay experience though. But not gay itself. Let's say you had a raging dyke lesbian. If she had sex with a man one time just to see what it is like, it doesn't make her straight, does it? It just means she had a straight experience. Trouble is, the ladyboys are almost a third gender. So that makes it hard to categorise them and the guys that shag them. I'm sure there are plenty of guys out there who ladyboys regularly, but would never consider sleeping with a "regular" guy. Maybe we need a new term for guys who shag ladyboys? (Apart from "weird" that is! ) Still, the more blokes who shag ladyboys the better - more chicks for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroyinEwa/Perv Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Trouble is, the ladyboys are almost a third gender. So that makes it hard to categorise them and the guys that shag them. I would have to disagree with this part of your post. If they have a cock, they're a guy dressing up as a girl. I don't really think that can be debatable. They may look like a girl and even fool some people and also some may even justify going with them because they look so much like a girl but when he takes off his clothes, his ding-a-ling will still be there. So no third gender exists, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 I would have to disagree with this part of your post. If they have a cock, they're a guy dressing up as a girl. I don't really think that can be debatable. They may look like a girl and even fool some people and also some may even justify going with them because they look so much like a girl but when he takes off his clothes, his ding-a-ling will still be there. So no third gender exists, in my opinion. Yeah.. see your point, but their bodies are often so pumped full of estrogen and other female hormones that internally and chemically they have changed from being a guy, maybe even slightly. But yes... they have a ding-a-ling, which does make it hard to dispute about them really being a guy. I agree! Fuck... why am I even participating in this thread?!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bibblies Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 I reckon that people who add superfluous apostrophes to plurals are gay. They only have to put a simple 's' on the end yet they like to mince it up. Oh, look! Too late for you to edit, batty boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 I reckon that people who add superfluous apostrophes to plurals are gay. They only have to put a simple 's' on the end yet they like to mince it up. Oh, look! Too late for you to edit, batty boy. 's 's 's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.