2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved

[Flashermac]

Looking back over my columns of the past 12 months, one of their major themes was neatly encapsulated by two recent items from The Daily Telegraph.

 

The first, on May 21, headed "Climate change threat to Alpine ski resorts", reported that the entire Alpine "winter sports industry" could soon "grind to a halt for lack of snow". The second, on December 19, headed "The Alps have best snow conditions in a generation" , reported that this winter's Alpine snowfalls "look set to beat all records by New Year's Day".

 

Easily one of the most important stories of 2008 has been all the evidence suggesting that this may be looked back on as the year when there was a turning point in the great worldwide panic over man-made global warming. Just when politicians in Europe and America have been adopting the most costly and damaging measures politicians have ever proposed, to combat this supposed menace, the tide has turned in three significant respects.

 

First, all over the world, temperatures have been dropping in a way wholly unpredicted by all those computer models which have been used as the main drivers of the scare. Last winter, as temperatures plummeted, many parts of the world had snowfalls on a scale not seen for decades. This winter, with the whole of Canada and half the US under snow, looks likely to be even worse. After several years flatlining, global temperatures have dropped sharply enough to cancel out much of their net rise in the 20th century.

 

Ever shriller and more frantic has become the insistence of the warmists, cheered on by their army of media groupies such as the BBC, that the last 10 years have been the "hottest in history" and that the North Pole would soon be ice-free â?? as the poles remain defiantly icebound and those polar bears fail to drown. All those hysterical predictions that we are seeing more droughts and hurricanes than ever before have infuriatingly failed to materialise.

 

Even the more cautious scientific acolytes of the official orthodoxy now admit that, thanks to "natural factors" such as ocean currents, temperatures have failed to rise as predicted (although they plaintively assure us that this cooling effect is merely "masking the underlying warming trend", and that the temperature rise will resume worse than ever by the middle of the next decade).

 

Secondly, 2008 was the year when any pretence that there was a "scientific consensus" in favour of man-made global warming collapsed. At long last, as in the Manhattan Declaration last March, hundreds of proper scientists, including many of the world's most eminent climate experts, have been rallying to pour scorn on that "consensus" which was only a politically engineered artefact, based on ever more blatantly manipulated data and computer models programmed to produce no more than convenient fictions.

 

Thirdly, as banks collapsed and the global economy plunged into its worst recession for decades, harsh reality at last began to break in on those self-deluding dreams which have for so long possessed almost every politician in the western world. As we saw in this month's Poznan conference, when 10,000 politicians, officials and "environmentalists" gathered to plan next year's "son of Kyoto" treaty in Copenhagen, panicking politicians are waking up to the fact that the world can no longer afford all those quixotic schemes for "combating climate change" with which they were so happy to indulge themselves in more comfortable times.

 

Suddenly it has become rather less appealing that we should divert trillions of dollars, pounds and euros into the fantasy that we could reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by 80 per cent. All those grandiose projects for "emissions trading", "carbon capture", building tens of thousands more useless wind turbines, switching vast areas of farmland from producing food to "biofuels", are being exposed as no more than enormously damaging and futile gestures, costing astronomic sums we no longer possess.

 

As 2009 dawns, it is time we in Britain faced up to the genuine crisis now fast approaching from the fact that â?? unless we get on very soon with building enough proper power stations to fill our looming "energy gap" - within a few years our lights will go out and what remains of our economy will judder to a halt. After years of infantile displacement activity, it is high time our politicians â?? along with those of the EU and President Obama's US â?? were brought back with a mighty jolt into contact with the real world.

 

I must end this year by again paying tribute to my readers for the wonderful generosity with which they came to the aid of two causes. First their donations made it possible for the latest "metric martyr", the east London market trader Janet Devers, to fight Hackney council's vindictive decision to prosecute her on 13 criminal charges, ranging from selling in pounds and ounces to selling produce "by the bowl" (to avoid using weights her customers dislike and don't understand). The embarrassment caused by this historic battle has thrown the forced metrication policy of both our governments, in London and Brussels, into total disarray.

 

Since Hackney backed out of allowing four criminal charges against Janet to go before a jury next month, all that remains is for her to win her appeal in February against eight convictions which now look quite absurd (including those for selling veg by the bowl, as thousands of other London market traders do every day). The final goal, as Neil Herron of the Metric Martyrs Defence Fund insists, must then be a pardon for the late Steve Thoburn and the four other original "martyrs" who were found guilty in 2002 â?? after a legal battle also made possible by this column's readers â?? of breaking laws so ridiculous that the EU Commission has even denied they existed (but which are still on the statute book).

 

Readers were equally generous this year in rushing to the aid of Sue Smith, whose son was killed in a Snatch Land Rover in Iraq in 2005. Their contributions made it possible for her to carry on with the High Court action she has brought against the Ministry of Defence, with the sole aim of calling it to account for needlessly risking soldiers' lives by sending them into battle in hopelessly inappropriate vehicles. Thanks not least to Mrs Smith's determined fight, the Snatch Land Rover scandal, first reported here in 2006, has at last become a national cause celebre.

 

May I finally thank all those readers who have written to me in 2008 â?? so many that, as usual, it has not been possible to answer all their messages. But their support and information has been hugely appreciated. May I wish them and all of you a happy (if globally not too warm) New Year.

 

- Christopher Booker

 

 

Link

[Flashermac]

Should Al Gore return his No-bull Prize?

 

 

 

 

 

[Coss]

I've noted that in NZ the ski season has been the best in years with 8m snowfall where they normally get 1~3m

 

And also, whilst every one is measuring the retreat of glacier fronts, no-one, is measuring the build up at the back of glaciers, is it getting bigger or smaller? They don't know.

 

F'n alarmists have just been turfed out of government in NZ, hopefully this is the beginning of a trend.

 

Cheers

 

Coss

[khunsanuk]

Hi,

 

I have no idea about global warning being true or not, just not qualified/informed enough to make a call on it, I do feel that the author of that article is as radically opposed to global warming as he claims the pro people are.

 

Sanuk!

 

[kamui]

In Europe there won't be a ski season anymore in one-two decades or so, and the Rhine river will run dry in summer because the glaciers are gone as the main source of water in summer. Also we already see a change of the flora and fauna due to (global?) warming in Europe.

Also the North-East passage will be soon free and Greenland can soon start farming. In many areas like Siberia Permafrost going away which will change huge areas.

At the same time huge parts of China are becoming deserts, e.g., e.g., e.g.,

 

Change is on it's way, that can not be disputed.

[Faustian]

It's actually quite amusing how ill informed he is. He doesn't have a clue about the subject, but is seemingly happy to write an opinion piece which will influence his readers minds. Irresponsible journalism?

 

As usual he fails to mention historically low solar output or the orbital variation, both of which should be cooling the earth.

 

The Telegraph, truly a joke of a newspaper. The kind of thing RY would read were he english. Conservative and ghastly.

 

[Lord Toad]

The whole point about opinion pieces they are exactly that, and a balanced newspaper should have all views. The Torygraph generally does, and this is no exception. All one view would be equally wrong!

 

In my view this is a good summary of the problem which I read a few days ago.

 

The much- hyped global warming is about excessive population as much as anything else. We are simply abusing the planet, stealing the planetâ??s resources, cluttering up the planet with our waste, whilst, at the same time, expanding our numbers, to the detriment of our environment as well as that of the other creatures that we share this planet with.

 

I think that is fair comment!

[Guest lazyphil]

<>

 

 

ghastly lol, not heard that one since an episode of jeeves and wooster!!

[drogon]

Just finished a Tom Clancy book "rainbow 6" and although the solution some people in the book (erase the human race except the true druids) might not influence climate change it sure would reduce humand population...

 

I wonder if, in a "not too distant" future, some countries will not consider large scale massacre as to reduce the population.

 

Something which worries me far more than global warming (after all it is just part of a bigger problem if it occurs) which is:

 

- Too many people for too small ressources -> plus destroying some of these ressources doesn't help.

 

What will mankind do when (and this is already partly the case) we will not be able to feed ourselves by lack of food products and water???

 

I egoistically hope it will not happen during my lifetime but I fear we will see large scale famine occur??

 

(global warming is just a factor in this equation)

[beano]

Hi,

 

I have no idea about global warning being true or not, just not qualified/informed enough to make a call on it, I do feel that the author of that article is as radically opposed to global warming as he claims the pro people are.

 

Sanuk!

Christopher Booker was the guy who claimed that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder".