Guest lazyphil Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 fuck him steve, the sleazy little fucker should do time. on your logic any convict in side could just get released...'give them a break'....or 'cut them some slack'......he commited a serious crime.....'do the crime do the time' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Munchmaster Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Hopefully the Swiss will see sense and release him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 in which case release those inside for similar crimes. he raped a THIRTEEN year old for fucks sake! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiHome Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 The victum has filed a legal declaration Monday asking that the charge against Polanski be dismissed in the interest of saving her from further trauma as the case is publicized anew. TH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTO Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Drugged her first - which to me is worse - not even a defense of "She wanted too" works with that. Yes there are 13 year olds that look older - seeing the pics of her he took she's clearly under 16 though. Yes "consensual" sex happens with people under age but all countries recognize 13 year olds aren't mature enough to give consent Yes 13 year olds throw themselves at "Stars" as per the recent Rolling Stone thread. But to have to drug her so you can do it? Ergh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTO Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Drugged her first - which to me is worse - not even a defense of "She wanted too" works with that. Yes there are 13 year olds that look older - seeing the pics of her he took she's clearly under 16 though. Yes "consensual" sex happens with people under age but all countries recognize 13 year olds aren't mature enough to give consent Yes 13 year olds throw themselves at "Stars" as per the recent Rolling Stone thread. But to have to drug her so you can do it? Ergh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 rapist are the lowest of the low. then you have child rapist who drug their prey. vile. but as TH said she wants to drop it to save trauma. the 'genius' or whatever label he's got walks. lets hope one day he gets ass fucked raped by a nigerian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Yeah, I am in the camp that says he should not skate on this one. Send him back, sentence him, charge him with flight from prosecution or what ever, sentence him for that as well, and lock his ass up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Hi, Agree, he should be sentenced for this. As a sidenote, what if he wasn't famous? Do you think there would be people saying he should be 'given a break'? Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTO Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Depends - Gary Glitter is famous but not "groovy" "Intellectual" enough Polanski is part of the in crowd I think he is far worse than Glitter by the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.