Jump to content

Usa Thread


TroyinEwa/Perv
 Share

Recommended Posts

Will Michael Savage be promoting his book in the U.K.? Nope, he's banned there. If he really wants to make his vote count, he should move to a swing state. California is going for Obama. HH, if you feel that way about Obama, maybe you should take the same advice. Without knowing the Republican nominee, I know Kansas will vote Republican, so my vote makes no difference. Being a life long Democrat, I did register as a Republican a couple of months ago in order to votes for the Republican crazies in the primaries and leave open a possible Democratic countywide/statewide win in November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Michael Savage be promoting his book in the U.K.? Nope, he's banned there. If he really wants to make his vote count, he should move to a swing state. California is going for Obama. HH, if you feel that way about Obama, maybe you should take the same advice. Without knowing the Republican nominee, I know Kansas will vote Republican, so my vote makes no difference. Being a life long Democrat, I did register as a Republican a couple of months ago in order to votes for the Republican crazies in the primaries and leave open a possible Democratic countywide/statewide win in November.

 

I listen to Michael Savage every once in a while.

He sounds interesting at first but doesn't provide

any real solutions. He likes to point the finger.

 

Being he lives in a 'Socialist' state, you would think he would move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

He recognizes Mitt Romney doesn’t fit that bill, but he will vote for him anyway if the former Massachusetts governor becomes the Republican nominee, because the alternative is unacceptable.

 

But while the nation’s economic woes offer an advantage to Romney, Savage fears Obama could be re-elected anyway, noting today’s news that polls in swing states show women have moved in Obama’s direction, giving him the lead.

 

Women are flocking toward Obama, Savage said, because they look at the Republican field and “see a nightmare.â€

 

“Romney says nothing, Santorum is nauseating, Gingrich is physically repulsive,†he explained. “So women are saying, ‘You know, I’ll stick with him.’ It’s all style anyway.â€

 

Savage said it’s still unclear who Romney is.

 

 

I had to chuckle. Romney is worse than Obama. He's the worse of Obama with none of the benefits from a party that is controlled by the Christian equivalent of fundamental moslems.

 

Not even a choice. Clearly Obama. Santorum staying as viable as he is tells us everything we need to know. He speaks of Tyranny? So, we re-elect the party that gave us the Patriots Act, Homeland Security, etc? LOL....I'd laugh if I didn't want to cry. Crying would be more appropriate.

 

Ron Paul should have run as a Democrat. They'd at least listen to him. And I guarantee you in 2016 he'd do better as a Democrat than he would as a Republican.

 

I recall the demonization of Clinton in the '90s. A boon decade for America and when they couldn't fault him economically, they went after him personally. The argument being, yeah, I know the country is doing great but the guy leading it isn't moral.

 

SO we got a 'moral' guy in '00 and the complete opposite happened economically. I used to vote Republican on occasion. Kicking myself for doing so now. The old mantra of 'the other guy is the anti christ' but no mention of how your guy is better is far from old. Fact is Romney, Santorum and Ginggrich suck ass. They make Obama look like a Mt. Rushmore candidate and that's pretty hard to do but they found a way.

 

The republican masses are brainwashed far, far more than the Dems are. The Democratic machine was 100% for Hillary. The people heard a different voice and it made sense to them. Like or hate him, I admire the Dem masses for going with whom they felt was best even if they weren't sure he'd even win. The Republicans on the other hand go with who they think will win. I will admit though that Santorum is who many want knowing he won't have a chance and so I must acknowledge that even if its someone who will further divide us.

 

Obama is beatable. He's beatable with reason, logic, passion and ideas. The three stooges don't offer us that. Paul and Gary Johnson do and they are rejected.

 

One of my other reasons for an Obama win is that I don't want to see religious extremism, division politics, classying American citizens as more 'American' than others and big money cronyism rewarded. If you're born in America or naturalized you're a real American. Any other definition is bullsh*t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what my biggest fears are about Obama? That he keeps doing the same things that he's been doing in some cases. These are things backed by Republicans: foreign wars. piece by piece destruction of our civil liberties. Maintaining the power of the HSA. Increasing the power of the executive branch. Giving big money the final say in Washington.

 

These are all things the top 3 Republican candidates would do and worse yet, they would legalize religious views as a bonus. Because no matter how you slice that pie, anti gay marriage, anti abortion and the like is a religious issue. Their basis has NOTHING to do with the constitution and EVERYTHING to do with religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what my biggest fears are about Obama? That he keeps doing the same things that he's been doing in some cases. These are things backed by Republicans: foreign wars. piece by piece destruction of our civil liberties. Maintaining the power of the HSA. Increasing the power of the executive branch. Giving big money the final say in Washington.

 

These are all things the top 3 Republican candidates would do and worse yet, they would legalize religious views as a bonus. Because no matter how you slice that pie, anti gay marriage, anti abortion and the like is a religious issue. Their basis has NOTHING to do with the constitution and EVERYTHING to do with religion.

 

 

Romney might take away our coffee and booze

or at least raise the excise to a prohibitive level on alchol

and put an excise tax on coffee.

All in the name of god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/ford-posts-best-march-sales-5-years-ford-160740190.html

Ford Posts Best March Sales in 5 Years: Here’s How Ford Averted Bankruptcy in 2008Ford's biggest savior in 2008 was Alan Mulally who left Boeing in 2006 to become the CEO of the number two U.S. automaker. What did he have that others didn't?

"He had an outsider's perspective," says Hoffman. "He was able to come in and really assess what was wrong with Ford because a lot of the people who had grown up in the company's culture weren't able to take a real objective look at it."

Mulally also had a "real strong leadership approach" and was able to "cut through a lot of the board room politics. The company's corporate culture "had held Ford back for so long," says Hoffman.

They did not cut back on product development during the crisis," says Hoffman. "That was key to Mulally's strategy."

But Mulally didn't keep Ford from the brink all on his own. "They had some real financial talent on their board," says Hoffman. In particular, he cites Carl Reichert, former head of Wells Fargo, who saw an industry crisis coming in 2006 and advised Mulally to take out a $26 billion line of credit. As a result "[Ford] had a cushion that GM and Chrysler did not have," says Hoffman

Hoffman also uncovered a number of other surprising things about Ford that was never before reported, including:

• Ford's secret alliance with competitors Toyota and Honda (HMC) "They worked with their arch rivals, their bitter enemies to kind of help each other keep the suppliers that were critical to all of their operations in business," says Hoffman.

• Ford's secret negotiations with the UAW that led to "game-changing" labor contracts in 2007 and 2009.

• The board's push to sell the company or file for bankruptcy as well as their desire to have Bill Ford step aside in 2006.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romney might take away our coffee and booze

or at least raise the excise to a prohibitive level on alchol

and put an excise tax on coffee.

All in the name of god.

 

You know what? I think Romney is a moderate with regards to religion. Which is saying a lot for a Mormon. Those folks are pretty devout.

 

I like the reasons why he is not liked by the fringe of the party. They don't like that he doesn't let religion into politics. You can't govern Massachusetts as a fringe right. Bostonians don't play that. This is Kennedy country.

 

Its why Santorum is doing so well. He appeals to the religious zealots in the party.

 

That said, I don't see much else in Romney. There is nothing else there. No ideas. Its the same old mantra. Cut taxes for the rich. Drill oil everywhere.

 

He doesn't offer me anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheriff Joe expands Obama probe to Hillary supporters

 

 

PHOENIX – Based on interviews WND conducted with insiders in Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, Sheriff Joe Arpaio has decided to expand the scope of his law enforcement investigation into President Obama’s eligibility to include evidence and affidavits documenting alleged criminal activity by the Obama campaign in the 2008 Democratic Party primary race.

 

Hollywood film producer Bettina Viviano and Hollywood-based digital photographer Michele Thomas have given Arpaio’s investigators the names of dozens of Hillary Clinton supporters willing to come forward with evidence and affidavits.

 

Among their claims is that the Clintons were the first to charge Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and that his birth certificate is a forgery.

 

Moreover, the Hillary supporters identified by Viviano and Thomas have argued that the pattern of questionable and possibly illegal activity suggests that the alleged act of producing forged birth certificate documentation for Obama may have been merely more of the same.

 

As WND reported, Viviano claims she heard Bill Clinton say that Obama is not eligible to be president.

 

...

 

Viviano, working with screenplay writer and director Gigi Gaston, produced in 2008 a documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced,†based on interviews from participants in Democratic Party primary caucuses. They accuse the Obama administration of illegitimate and illegal acts, including threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents and busing in voters in exchange for meals.

 

“This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign,†Gaston and Viviano write on the “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008 website, which features a 40-minute preview of the documentary.

 

“We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign ‘Chicago Machine’ dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of ‘change’ from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote.â€

 

Arpaio’s investigation has already uncovered evidence of intimidation by Obama supporters in an attempt to suppress media coverage of the birth certificate and eligibility issues.

 

A memo published by the Hillary for President campaign March 4, 2008, noted the following specific accusations of irregularities and voter intimidation allegedly committed by the Obama campaign:

 

- Irregularities: Prematurely taking precinct convention packets by the Obama campaign;

- Voter intimidation: Lockout of Clinton caucus goers by the Obama campaign;

 

- Obama supporters filling out precinct convention sign-in sheets during the day and submitting them as completed vote totals at caucuses, a practice explicitly forbidden by Democratic Party rules.

 

The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal,†reflecting “a wanton disregard for the caucus process.â€

 

Hillary: continuing threat to Obama

 

In the 2010 mid-term elections, the blue-collar voters who supported Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign abandoned the Democratic Party led by Obama.

 

A Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll after the November 2010 elections showed Democrats’ support from white, non-college-educated male voters dropped 12 percent from 2008, with only 29 percent of blue-collar men supporting the Democrats in 2010, down from 41 percent in 2008, as reported by TheHill.com.

 

Last November, prominent Democratic pollsters Patrick Caddell and Douglas Schoen, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggesting Obama should abandon his candidacy for re-election, stepping aside for “the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.â€

 

Conceding that even with an all-time-low job approval rating and even worse ratings on handling the economy, Obama could “eke out†a victory in November 2012, Caddell and Schoen argued that the type of campaign required for Obama’s “political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern – not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.â€

 

The PUMA P.A.C. that emerged to oppose Obama and support Hillary in 2008 remains in existence. It describes itself as “a burgeoning group of bloggers, writers and citizens who are joining together to fight back against the corrupt leadership of the DNC, their ‘chosen’ candidate and the mainstream media that enables them.â€

 

In 2008, Obama won over women voters, with 56 percent voting for him, versus 49 percent of men, according to Woman’s Vote Watch at Rutgers University.

 

The Obama campaign appears to have gained at least a temporary advantage among women, after charging that GOP presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, are “hostile to women†for their stand on contraceptives, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll released this week.

 

According to the poll, Obama’s biggest advantage rests with women under 50, with six in 10 supporting him. Romney’s support in that demographic dropped to 30 percent, giving Obama a 2-to-1 advantage.

 

Obama administration senior officials confirmed Monday that Clinton will not campaign for Obama to avoid making her position as secretary of state appear political, according to the Huffington Post.

 

Clinton previously announced she plans to leave the State Department at the end of Obama’s current term.

 

My link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a life long Democrat, I did register as a Republican a couple of months ago in order to votes for the Republican crazies in the primaries and leave open a possible Democratic countywide/statewide win in November.

 

 

Just like a Yellow Dog Democrat friend who is a registered Republican simply so he can vote for the weakest Republican candidates in the primaries. It's called True Democracy.

 

I was raised in Yellow Dog Democrat family. Republicans were a dirty word. Since then I've grown up, as did my father. We realise that both parties are full of crap and vote for the candidate likely to be least harmful to us. A pox on both parties!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Michael Savage be promoting his book in the U.K.? Nope, he's banned there. If he really wants to make his vote count, he should move to a swing state. California is going for Obama. HH, if you feel that way about Obama, maybe you should take the same advice. Without knowing the Republican nominee, I know Kansas will vote Republican, so my vote makes no difference. Being a life long Democrat, I did register as a Republican a couple of months ago in order to votes for the Republican crazies in the primaries and leave open a possible Democratic countywide/statewide win in November.

 

Dean...believe me, if I was 40 years younger, I'd leave Mexifornia pronto ! Place is totally screwed up. 30 years of liberal domination destroyed what used to be "The Golden State". Just have too many ties here to pack up and leave.

 

HH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...