unit731 Posted December 16, 2012 Report Share Posted December 16, 2012 There are no secrets anymore. Every house, log cabin, shack must have a street number. Even a hunting shack deep in the woods. All phone calls are listened to by government contracted software companies. All emails are scanned and saved. Cameras are continually being placed everywhere. OBDIII is coming. Government knows wherever you are if you carry your cell phone with you. An RFID chip is in your drivers license and passport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzz Posted December 16, 2012 Report Share Posted December 16, 2012 Can you throw the bullshit flag... Hillary Clinton faints, has concussion U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sustained a concussion after becoming dehydrated and fainting, and will no longer testify Thursday before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Clinton had been suffering from a stomach virus at the time, according to a statement on Saturday from Philippe Reines, deputy assistant secretary of state. She is being monitored by doctors and is recovering at home. She was never hospitalized, Reines said.... Wouldn't want her to have to accept any responsibility for the latest fuck up she is RESPONSIBLE for... maybe RESPONSIBLE is now a four letter word Are you implying that she's called in sick just to avoid testifying before the Senate Hearing on the Benghazi attack? That whole Benghazi affair doesn't smell right. She may have a lot to hide. I would expect that she would have to testify eventually. (imagine Hillery Clinton in a hospital bed being wheeled in to testiy, like they did Mubarack in Egypt ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robaus Posted December 16, 2012 Report Share Posted December 16, 2012 I'm all for it. How do you do it so that not a soul will have guns here? Nothing would be better than a tragedy like this never happening again. Like they did in Australia. Cash buy back for guns and destroy them. Include amnesty for illegally owned weapons. Just get them out of circulation. Allow 6 months leeway period. Thereafter, massive fines and imprisonment for possessing a gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted December 16, 2012 Report Share Posted December 16, 2012 The parents of a ten year old are outraged that their child was strip searched so that a teacher could search for $20 bill that was missing and that the schooled ‘believed’ fifth-grader Justin Cox had stolen: From CBS Charlotte: The parents of a 10-year old Union elementary school student have filed a complaint against the school for strip-searching their son to find an allegedly stolen $20 bill. In a complaint filed against assistant principal Teresa Holmes on Dec. 6, the family of Clinton, N.C., fifth-grader Justin Cox allege their son was ordered to remove his socks, shoes, pants and shirt so the principal could conduct a manual search for a $20 bill that was inevitably found in the cafeteria. The Sampson County school in North Carolina ‘regretted’ the search but maintained it had the right to do so. Cox’s mother objected to the way the search was conducted, as well as the fact that she hadn’t been notified about the search, but only learned about it from her ‘upset’ son. In 2009, the Supreme Court ruled that a 13 year old student’s rights were violated when the school strip searched her for allegedly-concealed medication it ultimately did not find. However, earlier this year, the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of strip searches for ‘minor offenses,’ including traffic stops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCorinthian Posted December 16, 2012 Report Share Posted December 16, 2012 The parents of a ten year old are outraged that their child was strip searched so that a teacher could search for $20 bill that was missing and that the schooled ‘believed’ fifth-grader Justin Cox had stolen: From CBS Charlotte: The parents of a 10-year old Union elementary school student have filed a complaint against the school for strip-searching their son to find an allegedly stolen $20 bill. In a complaint filed against assistant principal Teresa Holmes on Dec. 6, the family of Clinton, N.C., fifth-grader Justin Cox allege their son was ordered to remove his socks, shoes, pants and shirt so the principal could conduct a manual search for a $20 bill that was inevitably found in the cafeteria. The Sampson County school in North Carolina ‘regretted’ the search but maintained it had the right to do so. Cox’s mother objected to the way the search was conducted, as well as the fact that she hadn’t been notified about the search, but only learned about it from her ‘upset’ son. In 2009, the Supreme Court ruled that a 13 year old student’s rights were violated when the school strip searched her for allegedly-concealed medication it ultimately did not find. However, earlier this year, the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of strip searches for ‘minor offenses,’ including traffic stops. Correction: "...earlier this year, the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of strip searches for ‘minor offenses,’ including traffic stops when the person is arrested and taken to jail. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted December 17, 2012 Report Share Posted December 17, 2012 Obama administration, Congress quietly let school security funds lapse http://www.washingtonguardian.com/washingtons-school-security-failure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCorinthian Posted December 17, 2012 Report Share Posted December 17, 2012 An RFID chip is in your drivers license and passport. An RFID chip is readable from how far away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted December 17, 2012 Report Share Posted December 17, 2012 As a non-USA person, I have this observation to offer: If you throw a bunch of armed people into an area, someone is going to get shot. My take on this is to imprison for life or longer, or execute anyone who shoots anyone else, except in clear and demonstrable cases of justifiable self defense or the defense of others, i.e. family or children. That's it. If you want a gun, then you use it responsibly, or else it's goodbye. And before anyone says but this latest idiot didn't own the guns etc etc. If they'd been locked up as all guns should be, he couldn't have got them. If the USA society had a clear understanding that the Rambo films are not reality, and that guns are not for shooting people, then maybe he wouldn't have considered it. So I'd lock up/execute the mother and the people who sold her the guns - not responsible people in my book... Same same drink driving, if you cause no problems, you'll have no problems, if you injure or kill anyone whilst drink driving - goodbye! Too many rights are accorded the modern man/woman. The right to have weapons and then go "postal" is not one that anyone intended. I saw a nice comment from some woman on the TV today, why do we need to be armed for war in suburban America? Mind you, good way to improve the gene pool... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted December 17, 2012 Report Share Posted December 17, 2012 The killer had tried to purchase a rifle only about a week prior. After a police background check, he was refused. But his mama left her own firearms laying around were loony son could get them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted December 17, 2012 Report Share Posted December 17, 2012 Her loony son and anyone with a functioning hand that could turn a door knob... I'd jail her for life for contributory negligence... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now