Usa Thread

[Bangkoktraveler]

No, it isn't a bet. Cuz I think the worst president in the last century has enough useful idiots who will probably continue to believe his bullshit and ignore what he's actually doing to the country. He's a fucking incompetent, clever, charismatic failure. But there are millins of dumbshits would would pass on the chance to vote for a piece of shit instead of voting for him.

 

HH

 

 

 

A lot of words but I don't see any facts to support your position.

 

I hope you are not giving credit to Obama for things GWB did and/or initiated.

[allistar]

No, it isn't a bet. Cuz I think the worst president in the last century has enough useful idiots who will probably continue to believe his bullshit and ignore what he's actually doing to the country. He's a fucking incompetent, clever, charismatic failure. But there are millins of dumbshits would would pass on the chance to vote for a piece of shit instead of voting for him.

 

HH

Wasn't Warren Harding President in the 1920's (and a Republican, to boot). I think he is about as bad as they get. Of course, today there is no need for a President to bestow political favors for favoritism after he leaves office (in other words, money). Between the book deals and fees for speeches, they can do alright by themselves. Just be thankful that Obama doesn't have any children old enough to be President (I seriously doubt if his wife wants the job).

[Steve]

No' date=' it isn't a bet. Cuz I think the worst president in the last century has enough useful idiots who will probably continue to believe his bullshit and ignore what he's actually doing to the country. He's a fucking incompetent, clever, charismatic failure. But there are millins of dumbshits would would pass on the chance to vote for a piece of shit instead of voting for him.

 

HH[/quote']

Wasn't Warren Harding President in the 1920's (and a Republican, to boot). I think he is about as bad as they get. Of course, today there is no need for a President to bestow political favors for favoritism after he leaves office (in other words, money). Between the book deals and fees for speeches, they can do alright by themselves. Just be thankful that Obama doesn't have any children old enough to be President (I seriously doubt if his wife wants the job).

 

They all get $199,700 a year for life. (its taxable though :nahnah: ) as well as Secret Service protection for themselves and their spouse (and I think children, not sure). Also, they can get treatment at any military hospital.

[Steve]

http://www.wkrg.com/medical/article/welfare-recipients-must-pass-drug-test-in-florida/1207303/Jun-01-2011_3-03-pm/

 

Applicants will have to pay for the tests themselves and will be reimbursed if they pass.

 

MIAMI, Florida - Welfare applicants will have to undergo drug testing under a bill Gov. Rick Scott signed.

 

Scott signed the bill Tuesday in Panama City along with another measure that bans the designer drug MDPV or "bath salts."

 

The drug testing bill was a priority for Scott. It will require anyone applying for temporary government assistance to pass the test before receiving benefits.

 

Applicants will have to pay for the tests themselves and will be reimbursed if they pass.

 

The law is expected to be quickly challenged. A similar Michigan law passed in 1999 that required random drug testing of Welfare recipients lasted five weeks in 1999 before it was stopped by a

judge. An appeals court ruled it unconstitutional after a four-year legal battle.

 

[Steve]

A critic of opines on the bill

 

[Flashermac]

TV Executives Admit in Taped Interviews That Hollywood Pushes a Liberal Agenda

 

 

 

In clips that will hit the Internet to promote a new book, producers including "Friends" co-creator Marta Kauffman and "House" creator David Shore say Hollywood discriminates against and belittles conservatives.

 

Some of TV’s top executives from the past four decades may have gotten more than they bargained for when they agreed to be interviewed for a politically charged book that was released Tuesday, because video of their controversial remarks will soon be hitting the Internet.

 

The book makes the case that TV industry executives, writers and producers use their clout to advance a liberal political agenda. The author bases his thesis on, among other things, 39 taped interviews that he’ll roll out piecemeal during the next three weeks.

 

The Hollywood Reporter obtained several of the not-yet-released clips, embedded below. Each contains a snippet of an interview, usually some historical footage of the TV shows the interviewee was responsible for and, naturally, a plea to purchase the book, “Primetime Propaganda†by Ben Shapiro and published by Broad Side, an imprint of HarperCollins.

 

In one video, Friends co-creator Marta Kauffman says that when she cast Candace Gingrich-Jones, half-sister of Republican former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, as the minister of a lesbian wedding, “There was a bit of ‘fuck you’ in it to the right wing.â€

 

Kauffman also acknowledges she “put together a staff of mostly liberal people,†which is another major point of Shapiro’s book: that conservatives aren’t welcome in Hollywood.

 

Maybe that’s because they’re “idiots†and have “medieval minds.†At least that’s what Soap and Golden Girls creator Susan Harris thinks of TV’s conservative critics.

 

However, the ranks of dumb right-wingers has dwindled, according to Harris, whose video has her saying: “At least, you know, we put Obama in office, and so people, I think, are getting – have gotten – a little bit smarter.â€

 

Some of the videos have executives making rather obvious revelations, like when Larry Gelbart and Gene Reynolds talk about pacifist messages in M*A*S*H or when MacGyver producer Vin Di Bona says anti-gun messages were a recurring theme in that show.

 

But an additional video has Di Bona, who also created America’s Funniest Home Videos, becoming remarkably blunt about his approval of a lack of political diversity in Hollywood. When Shapiro asks what he thinks of conservative critics who say everyone in Hollywood is liberal, Di Bona responds: “I think it’s probably accurate, and I’m happy about it.â€

 

Another video has Leonard Goldberg — who executive produces Blue Bloods for CBS and a few decades ago exec produced such hits as Fantasy Island, Charlie’s Angels and Starsky and Hutch — saying that liberalism in the TV industry is “100 percent dominant, and anyone who denies it is kidding, or not telling the truth.â€

 

Shapiro asks if politics are a barrier to entry. “Absolutely,†Goldberg says.

 

When Shapiro tells Fred Pierce, the president of ABC in the 1980s who was instrumental in Disney’s acquisition of ESPN, that “It’s very difficult for people who are politically conservative to break in†to television, he responds: “I can’t argue that point.†Those who don’t lean left, he says, “don’t promote it. It stays underground.â€

 

[color:red]Another video rolling out soon has House creator David Shore acknowledging that "there is an assumption in this town that everybody is on the left side of the spectrum, and that the few people on the right side, I think people look at them somewhat aghast, and I'm sure it doesn't help them."[/color]

 

In the book, subtitled "The true Hollywood story of how the left took over your TV," Shapiro also tells anecdotes of bias against conservatives. One example is Dwight Schultz, best known for his roles as Murdock in The A-Team and Barclay in Star Trek: The Next Generation.

 

The late Bruce Paltrow knew that Schultz was a fan of President Ronald Reagan. When Schultz showed up to audition for St. Elsewhere, a show Paltrow produced, to read for the part of Fiscus, Paltrow told him: "There's not going to be a Reagan asshole on this show!" The part went to Howie Mandel.

 

[color:red]"Most nepotism in Hollywood isn't familial, it's ideological," Shapiro writes in the book. "Friends hire friends. And those friends just happen to share their politics."[/color]

 

Another video Shapiro will release shortly has producer-director Nicholas Meyer being asked point-blank whether conservatives are discriminated against in Hollywood. "Well, I hope so," he answers. Meyer also admits his political agenda for The Day After, a TV movie he directed for ABC that was seen by 100 million people when it aired in 1983.

 

"My private, grandiose notion was that this movie would unseat Ronald Reagan when he ran for re-election," Meyer says.

 

Even seemingly harmless shows like Happy Days and Sesame Street have been used to advance a progressive agenda, according to Shapiro.

 

For example, William Bickley, a writer on The Partridge Family and a producer on Happy Days, says he infused Vietnam War protest messages into the latter. “I was into all that kind of masturbation,†he says in a soon-to-be-released video.

 

[color:red]"Television has been perhaps the most impressive weapon in the left's political arsenal," Shapiro argues in the book.[/color]

 

Other upcoming videos include: Family Ties creator Gary David Goldberg explaining how he tried to make Republican character Alex Keaton the bad guy but that actor Michael J. Fox was too darn lovable; and president of MTV Networks Entertainment Group Doug Herzog talking about his network having “superpowers†when it comes to its influence over young people.

 

The advancement of a gay and lesbian political agenda is mentioned by multiple executives, including Marcy Carsey, a producer of Soap and Roseanne, and Desperate Housewives producer Marc Cherry, who is a rarity in Hollywood: a gay Republican.

 

In her video, Carsey also says she insisted on portraying characters smoking marijuana in That ‘70s Show. “If this is a problem for you, we certainly understand, and we just won’t do the show,†she told executives at Fox.

 

Shapiro released two videos Tuesday, one featuring COPS creator John Langley saying he’s partial to segments where white people are the criminals, and the other has Fred Silverman, the former head of ABC and later NBC, saying “there’s only one perspective, and it’s a very progressive perspective†in TV comedy today. (Those videos are also posted below).

 

Shapiro said the executives felt comfortable talking about politics with him because they assumed, incorrectly, that he is on the left.

 

“Most of them didn’t Google me. If they had, they would have realized where I am politically,†he said. “I played on their stereotypes. When I showed up for the interviews, I wore my Harvard Law baseball cap — my name is Ben Shapiro and I attended Harvard, so there’s a 98.7 percent chance I’m a liberal. Except I happen not to be.â€

 

Shapiro said he’ll time the debut of certain videos for maximum effect. One that slams Sean Hannity, for example, is reserved for his scheduled appearance on Hannity’s show on the Fox News Channel.

 

And conservative pundit Ann Coulter has a new book out June 7. “I have two people ripping her by name, so I’ll release those the day Ann’s book is released,†Shapiro said.

 

One of those slamming Coulter is George Schlatter, who directed and produced Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In in the 1970s, using the show to knock Republicans and the Vietnam War. “The fact we pissed the Pentagon off, that pleased me enormously,†he says before calling Coulter “the c-word.â€

 

In his video, Schlatter also goes off on right-wing radio hosts Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham.

 

“I asked them for permission to tape, and there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy when you’re being interviewed for a book,†he said.

 

“If they’re going to be shocked at something, it should be themselves, not me,†Shapiro said. “They should be shocked that opinion is so one-sided in Hollywood that it’s OK to say, ‘I’m fine with discrimination.’â€

 

“My whole book is a plea for openness in the industry,†he added. “Hire people from the other side of the aisle once in a while, or at least stop mocking them.â€

 

Shapiro says he didn’t disclose that he’d be releasing the tapes, but that his subjects have no reason to complain.

 

 

 

Link

[Flashermac]

 

 

Tiny Payout In TSA Breast Exposure Lawsuit

 

 

 

JUNE 1 - The U.S. government paid a paltry $2350 to settle a lawsuit brought by a Texas woman who sued the Transportation Security Administration after her breasts were exposed during a vigorous frisking at a Texas airport, records show.

 

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Department of Justice released a copy of the settlement agreement reached earlier this year with Lynsie Murley, the 24-year-old Amarillo woman who sued the TSA for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress in connection with the May 2008 incident at the Corpus Christi airport.

 

The eight-page agreement notes that the settlement does not constitute an admission by government officials of any “liability, fault or wrongdoing.†It also stipulates that legal fees paid to Murley’s lawyers were not to exceed 25 percent of the settlement amount (or $587.50).

 

Murley charged in her lawsuit that she was “singled out for extended search procedures,†and that a TSA agent frisked her and “pulled Plaintiff’s blouse completely down, exposing Plaintiff’s breasts to everyone in the area.â€

 

TSA employees, Murley added, “joked and laughed about the incident for an extended period of time.†After leaving the security line to be “consoled by an acquaintance who had brought her to the airport,†Murley returned to the line, where a male TSA worker said that he had wished he was there when she first passed through. The employee, Murley recalled, added that “he would just have to watch the video.†The incident left Murley “extremely embarrassed and humiliated,†according to her complaint.

 

In January, when U.S. District Court filings revealed that a settlement had been reached, TSG requested a copy of the document memorializing the deal as well as the amount of money being paid to Murley.

 

However, Kathy Colvin, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of Texas, refused to provide the agreement or any details about the settlement. The settlement was subsequently provided to TSG in response to a FOIA request filed with the Justice Department’s Executive Office for United States Attorneys.

 

 

 

Link

 

 

[ghostdog]

maybe the settlement was tiny to match the breasts?

 

[Flashermac]

 

Need to check the video. Maybe it's on Youtube ... or at least on the TSA's own hot videos website.

 

 

[Flashermac]

 

VIDEO: Woman Screams For Help After TSA Molestation

 

 

 

Video of an incident recorded over the memorial weekend at Sky Harbor International in Phoenix, AZ, documents how the TSA deal with people who are traumatized by grossly invasive enhanced pat downs.

 

After a woman refused to go through a full body scanner she was pulled aside and made to undergo the pat down procedure. When the TSA agent touched the woman’s breasts, she broke down into tears and screamed for a police officer.

 

When police officers arrived on the scene they led the woman away and told her that unless she would submit to the full pat down procedure she would not be able to fly.

 

“Why won’t you help me? You’re a police officer why won’t you help me?†the woman asks in the video.

 

All the while the woman’s son was filming the ordeal on his phone, having to constantly fend off threats from TSA agents falsely claiming he was breaking the law. The agents also threatened to confiscate the man’s luggage, even though he had been through the screening process.

 

The family was previously subjected to similar scrutiny from the TSA at Sky Harbor earlier in the year, prompting them to voice protest over violation of their Constitutional rights.

 

The previous incident was also captured on video and was evidently remembered by some of the TSA workers who claimed to know that the whole family are "routine troublemakers".

 

 

 

Videos