Dateline Yemen

[kamui]

Getting Obama out of power has everything to do with what is good for the country. He is an evil m-fkr.

 

HH

 

I guess, this says this all. So why is he evil? His politics are far more close to moderate Reps positions than to moderate Dems.

And even if he would be moderate or even progressive Dem, why does this make him evil. As we all know Clintons politics worked very well for the USA...

[Bangkoktraveler]

If Obama was a Republican? Yeah, and IF pigs could fly. [color:red] Barry IS a socialist. No 2 ways about it. In fact, he's a Marxist. Sure, nobody who is a liberal, socialist or commie will admit it. They'd be scorned the same as a pedophile, here in the U.S. [/color] The libtards now like to be called "progressive". LOL.

 

Now, if the left wing of the Demoncrap Party is soooooo disappointed and disenchanted with Barry, why doesn't it nominate a "better" Marxist? I think that the answer is clear: there is no known/admitted Marxist of Barry's charisma and brand that could do as well. Barry is the face of the left wing of the party. There is nobody else that element can turn to. On the other hand, the GOP has a fistful of attractive alternatives. Sure, no candidate will from any party will "tick off" everybodies lists of "wants" and "don't wants". But the GOP has more candidates who are good for the country than the lefties have. (Not hard to do, as the left has NO candidates who are good for the country.)

 

Steve...beholden to the GOP? I voted Libertarian last time around. Sure, I'll admit to being more aligned with the GOP than the Communist...er, I mean, Demoncrap Party.

 

BTW, how did you switch from being a "small-L" libertarian to being "progressive"? Not even being in the same area code, my friend. I guess you got snatched while sleeping.

 

Getting Obama out of power has everything to do with what is good for the country. He is an evil m-fkr.

 

HH

 

[color:white]

.

.

.

.

.

 

[/color]

If Conservatives are not commies then for 'God sakes' please explain why Conservatives promoted the [color:red]'Stop Hillary Express' [/color]and told their people to register as Democrats so as to vote for Obama. It was Conservatives who put their 'boy' Obama in the White House.

[Bangkoktraveler]

I guess, this says this all. So why is he evil? His politics are far more close to moderate Reps positions than to moderate Dems.

And even if he would be moderate or even progressive Dem, why does this make him evil. As we all know Clintons politics worked very well for the USA...

 

 

Conservatives would have favored Sarah running the country. At least the women's bras and panty manufactures would see a profit.

[Hugh_Hoy]

I guess, this says this all. So why is he evil? His politics are far more close to moderate Reps positions than to moderate Dems.

And even if he would be moderate or even progressive Dem, why does this make him evil. As we all know Clintons politics worked very well for the USA...

 

You think Barry's politics are closer to moderate Reps than moderate Dems? Oh my God, Kamui. Stop ! You're killing me ! 555555555555555555 You seem to have very little, if any, concept of the terms of "liberal", "moderate" or "conservative" as applied to U.S. politics. I'll just leave it at that. BTW: 1.) I did not say being a moderate or progressive Dem is evil...I said that Barry is evil; 2.) Barry is NOT Clinton.

 

HH

[kamui]

You think Barry's politics are closer to moderate Reps than moderate Dems? Oh my God, Kamui. Stop ! You're killing me ! 555555555555555555 You seem to have very little, if any, concept of the terms of "liberal", "moderate" or "conservative" as applied to U.S. politics. I'll just leave it at that. BTW: 1.) I did not say being a moderate or progressive Dem is evil...I said that Barry is evil; 2.) Barry is NOT Clinton.

 

HH

 

 

You are right, the US definitions of terms like liberal, communist, socialist have nothing to do with the original ideologies and the governments and countries which actually tried to base their politics on those ideas. In the USA these terms are just empty words thrown around by the conservatives. How empty these terms are have shown the conservatives when the named Obama a socialist, a communist, fascist, Muslim, non-American in the same sentence.

 

As you might know, Germany had the unfortunate experience to deal with both radical ideologies: fascism and communism and I can assure you that they have nothing to do with *any* US Democrat politician and neither with most Republicans. I can also assure you that Nazi Germany and Communist/Socialist East Germany were very different from each other (of course both systems were dictatorships, but with different consequences for the inhabitants and surrounding countries).

 

What you describe as liberal would be seen as moderate conservative in any Western democracy besides the USA. And outside the US the Tea Party is being seen as radical right wing movement which aims to destroy the very fabric which holds the US society together. There is a reason, why the USA has been falling behind Asia in the past decade, and it was not because too much of good education, too big investments in infrastructure, e.g.

 

Of course the Reps have a major interest in throwing terms like 'socialst' at Obama, since, as we all know, the world becomes just black and white when seen through the lenses of an Ideology. And usually it means that those who watch the world through ideological lenses see themselves as the good ones (the saviors), while the 'Others' are bad and have to be destroyed (since they are 'evil', a very Middle-age christian term)..

 

Please explain me why Obama should be more evil than GWB. Shouldn't it be the other way around? It was GWB who as commander in chief was responsible for the deaths of ten thousands of people, fellow Americans as well has people in countries he claimed to liberate from the "evil". Also GWB was responsible for the destruction of huge parts of the US income through war and corruption (remember KBR?). And he destroyed almost single handed the US world leadership in regard to economics, culture and politics. Oh and I forgot, und his reign the great recession began, which is still haunting the world, a recession which in its core was almost 100% US custom made.

 

I guess not many US presidents did achive this level of destruction as GWB and his cronies did within just 8 years. So why is Obama that worse in your eyes?

[Bangkoktraveler]

Please explain me why Obama should be more evil than GWB. Shouldn't it be the other way around? It was GWB who as commander in chief was responsible for the deaths of ten thousands of people, fellow Americans as well has people in countries he claimed to liberate from the "evil". Also GWB was responsible for the destruction of huge parts of the US income through war and corruption (remember KBR?). And he destroyed almost single handed the US world leadership in regard to economics, culture and politics. Oh and I forgot, und his reign the great recession began, which is still haunting the world, a recession which in its core was almost 100% US custom made.

 

I guess not many US presidents did achive this level of destruction as GWB and his cronies did within just 8 years. So why is Obama that worse in your eyes?

 

color:white]

.

.

.

.

.

.

[/color]

Extra judicial executions and extra judicial punishment has been so much of the USA way of doing things that we are blinded by the things we have done in the past and present. What blinds us is the muddling of the Bible and Constitution as a means for justification of what we have done.