radioman Posted October 2, 2014 Report Share Posted October 2, 2014 No Windows 9 (Nein!) Perhaps it should have been Windows 7+ http://blogs.windows...ing-windows-10/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted October 2, 2014 Report Share Posted October 2, 2014 Why not 9 ? because too many third party products had code of the form if(version.StartsWith("Windows 9")) { /* 95 and 98 */ } else { http://www.cnet.com/news/is-this-why-microsoft-named-it-windows-10/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioman Posted October 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2014 Methinks once upon a time Microsoft might have told third parties to fix their "incompatible" code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 And Windows 10 is free for you geeks out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 ....you get what you pay for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baa99 Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 ... but usually less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioman Posted October 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I'm not expecting to be asked to pay for the next update to OS-X either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now