Coss Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 1- Cav has in a previous post said that he's in contact with the board member who is Nostitz and posted content from him. 2- I believe that Cav had already linked the two names but as ou are correct I'll alter my post for the board name... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 Mr Nostitz -has a public persona unrelated to this board and has been discussed many times before, in particular his work in the journalistic field. And photos of the night life you know.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Nostitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Penis is hungry Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 All the more reason not to link other pseudonyms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 28 minutes ago, Coss said: Mr Nostitz -has a public persona unrelated to this board and has been discussed many times before, in particular his work in the journalistic field. And photos of the night life you know.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Nostitz Had a public persona unrelated to this board until such time as you posted his Public details alongside his board name. The wiki link posted does not make reference to his board name, sort of redundant actually. If Cav has previously linked his public and board names, it is up to you, as a moderator, to edit such posts and not use it as an excuse of “well since he did it so can I” hence my two wrongs don’t make a right post. According to Board Rules, which as a Moderator I would expect you to uphold, Privacy Posting information which could lead to the identification of individuals is forbidden. I didn’t make the rules, but I try my best to follow them Just the other week there was an instance In the “What Movie Just….” Thread, if I had repeated the Board Members name would that have been acceptable “because someone else did it first”, I am sure you know the answer to that. Not having. a go per se, just a little rant 😝 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 no, you are correct, you'll see that I have removed any board reference to the aforementioned I stand admonished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 2 hours ago, My Penis is hungry said: All the more reason not to link other pseudonyms an error that has been rectified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted November 25, 2021 Report Share Posted November 25, 2021 5 hours ago, Coss said: no, you are correct, you'll see that I have removed any board reference to the aforementioned I stand admonished I know, I just like giving you shit, don’t get many opportunities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted November 28, 2021 Report Share Posted November 28, 2021 worth a look https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/12/thailand-king-flies-germany-monarchy-reform-calls-persist https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/siam-king-returned-to-germany-with-huge-entourage-30-poodles-and-countless-chiobus.312468/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted December 30, 2021 Report Share Posted December 30, 2021 Germany to pull the plug on three of its last six nuclear plants https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-pull-plug-three-its-last-six-nuclear-plants-2021-12-30/ I'm asking: How has been the experience of this power source? And is the deceasing, of the plants, political (Greenies)? or practical (worn out equipment)? Not because I am anti or pro Nukeler ('merican spelling) power, but out of genuine interest, as my impression of Germany Persons (they, him, she) are that they tend to do things, after having thought them through, carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now