bust Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 If you happen to have a spare four and a half hours š Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 10 hours ago, Old Hippie said: Trump was in breech of U.S. Constitutional law on this oneā¦on an international legal, he did āattackā a sovereign nation without provocationā¦now lets assume Tulsi Gabbardās info was right and Iran is not close to having a nuke then wtf was the dump thinking..? But, and we have to look at this realistically, do we really want Iran to have a nuke and a delivery device with which to send it into Israel and or the USA Europe etc..? Remember, these are the fuckwits who want all non Muslims as well as some Muslims, to dieā¦these are the people who say they want to die in a holy war so they can go to heaven get the virgins etcā¦so for me, no, I donāt want them to have 1. I donāt even like the idea that we have them, there are currently enough nukes around to destroy the world 100ās of times over, we donāt need anymore and the last thing we want is an unstable regime to have themā¦yes it includes the current unstable USA regimeā¦ I'm with you. I'm from l'il 'ol nuclear free NZ Ā - "I can smell the Uranium on your breath..." David Lange - Oxford Debate As a contrarian, I can see that "properly ring fenced and run" Nukerler (G W Bush) power, is a boon, but Fukushima, 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl, show that governments and their proxies should not be allowed to run these things. Certainly I don't think anyone with religious views should have nukes. The world's problems come from too many tribes and too many tribe members. We nearly had an out, with Covid, and whilst most people are still wedded to the "happy ever after" view of the world, I see the survival of Homo Sapiens as one, where the population crashes to a minimum (Nukes, Disease, young people not breeding, what ever...) and it take the species many millennia to recover the tech, to get another population burst going. A dim view, but palatable for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 un intended dupe deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bust Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 6 hours ago, Coss said: Certainly I don't think anyone with religious views should have nukes. I definitely would not limit it to that. I think anyone with authoritarian tendencies should not either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bust Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 This is starting to get concerning. The imbecile is out of control and nobody has the balls to hold him accountable or challenge him. Especially when "Trump Was Right About Everything" is his new way of telling the world he suffers from delusional disorder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 And though it's us, that've been proven right, it brings no joy. Oh and by the way, not just us. All the pale necked primates with an I.Q. greater than 110, saw this coming. And like a witch's breakfast in a teenager's bedroom, there's no immediate way to clean it up. God help us if the Nobel people slip, in their standards, Mind you, I never understood why Obama, an American Politician, got one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 "Neither country knows what the fuck they are doing..." - DJTrump LINK Irony, oh the Irony.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo_bill Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 Bullshit all over the place as usual. Yellowman says the nuclear plants are totally destroyed, US military says they need to evaluate the destruction, reality seems to say limited destruction without large impact on producing nuclear whatever. Bubi undercover analysis predicts the Iranians show Yellowman the middlefinger and now really start working on nuclear devices 100 meters under the surface or maybe friends Wladimir or Kim or even Xi decide not to tolerate other peopleĀ“s action and decide to support their favorite assholes. This is not over but a start into something more serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coss Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 I agree with Bubi. Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say - LINK and now I'm using Signal, I got the following from a Hegseth group: _____ What the US top top top people showed the world: What the US top top top people showed the Donald ----- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bust Posted June 24 Report Share Posted June 24 Leaked reports expose the mission was a total failure with the damage minimal. Briefings abruptly canceled. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now