Old Hippie Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 3 hours ago, Mekong said: My Father was Shop Steward at local Shell Refinery and Chairman or the local branch of the communist party, I was a card carrying commie from age of 16 until I left the uk when I was mid 30s Midstream my Arse I’m currently a shop steward with the Teamsters Union, I tend to vote “Libertarian,” AKA “liberal republicans who want to smoke weed” or Conservative democrats that already smoke weed…” My views vary with the issue at hand…
Old Hippie Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 7 hours ago, buffalo_bill said: Radical Left is a term invented by US rightwing-followers for any US citizen who is not a rightwing-follower and in particular a Democrat supporter. You may have a look on some European countries what radical left in reality means. Here in the USA, the right, who, under the maga(t) flag, have hijacked common sense, anything that does not conform to their views is slandered as “liberal.” Those stating a “socialist idea” such as national health care, are labeled “libturd.” The right here is probably more “radical” than the left, and there in, lies the problem… Kind of sickening really…Oddly, most of these “conservatives/MAGATS” fail to understand that we have a lot of “socialism” built into our system. Our elderly medical coverage, retirement scam, police, fire, EMS services, everything the public needs is a form of socialism. Good when it benefits them, bad if it benefits anyone else, especially if that person is even 1 shade darker… The fringe “radical left” does exist here, but largely in the shadows. The radical right is another story, forming their own armed militias waiting for the day their Furher calls them to duty…again, very sickening.
Coss Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 Politically I'll always vote left and green, generally good things for people and planet. I'll decry folks bleating about stuff, that I haven't seen the science for. Where I differ is, in the views I have, that certain members of our populations, should be ground up and made into fertiliser...
Coss Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 Speaking of the left :: I dunno if any here have delved into Substack.com . something I came across A big read :: excerpt - Malcolm Caldwell was the consummate intellectual. He had spent his entire life studying Southeast Asian history and economic development. He had written hundreds of articles and over a dozen books on the subject. He was a professor and researcher at one of the most prestigious universities in the world and was celebrated and supported for his views. Much of his work dealt with English colonialism in Asia and its dire political consequences. As a result, Caldwell evolved into a staunch Marxist, far to the left of the leftiest leftist who ever lefted. ... excerpt - Pol Pot, not used to being lectured to by a professor, promptly had Caldwell killed that night. more at https://markmanson.substack.com/p/intellectuals-are-fcking-idiots?utm_source=multiple-personal-recommendations-email&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true
Old Hippie Posted May 13 Report Posted May 13 9 hours ago, Coss said: excerpt - Pol Pot, not used to being lectured to by a professor, promptly had Caldwell killed that night. Kida funny, like all the maga zealots who got burned by the dump…
Coss Posted May 13 Report Posted May 13 And it illustrates the difference between those, who are sure they know, how to run things, like me/us ~ and those who are sure, they want to do the running, like Trump/Pol Pot/et al...
bust Posted May 13 Report Posted May 13 Left v Right, Conservative v Democrat. At the end of the day they are all politicians with only one thing in mind. Self interest. They make policies and support interest groups in order to get re-elected. I would say most consider the people they represent a necessary inconvenience. 1
Old Hippie Posted May 13 Report Posted May 13 1 hour ago, bust said: Left v Right, Conservative v Democrat. At the end of the day they are all politicians with only one thing in mind. Self interest. They make policies and support interest groups in order to get re-elected. I would say most consider the people they represent a necessary inconvenience. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alvinfsc_george-carlin-explains-elite-power-and-the-activity-7284249024969285632-QOK2 1
buffalo_bill Posted May 14 Report Posted May 14 Very well. Many times I came over similar outbursts to call the " politicians" a bunch of people to fight for their "self interests" . What I did never come across has been any proposal how to find folks free from any evil just interested in the welfare of their brethren. The "politicians " are not a selection of the most useless people, they are what we are. To quote for the thousandth time what a professor at Bonn university once upon a time wrote : " They are meat of our meat." We are no better than them, we just don´t know how we would behave in similar or same position. PS: To avoid misunderstandings : I do not call Trump a politician. Born into a family of swines he just continued and so do his sons. Not sure yet about Barron.
Coss Posted May 14 Report Posted May 14 Friend of mine used to say, that in a cadre of say (for a small country) 1,000 politicians, every year the country does a quick vote, to take one out the back and put a bullet in their head. This would cause politicians to try to do good, to avoid death, and the 1 : 1,000 risk would be worth it, to be known as the golden boy... Like running from the bear, it could also be a cause to try to be the 2nd most bad...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now