zen4dummies Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 "felascious" ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torneyboy Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Why not ..enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen4dummies Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 "felascious" ??? The word is not in dictionary.com. However I vow to never visit Vermont again, or even for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen4dummies Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Sounds like a bunch of terrorists to me. Sounds like they should take the lot of 'em off to Thailand for a bit of waterboarding fun! Cheney and Bush I take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torneyboy Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Yep ..they would fit the bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Central Scrutinizer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 I'm surprised they got that many signatures. I thought they were all mostly snowbound up there still! Beautiful state considering they are landlocked (I like the ocean). More cows than people up there. 55555! Great cheese and maple syrup though, and loads of ex-hippies tilling the earth. I'd love to see what happens if Bush Co. ever went there! :thumbup: Add that list to the SS and FBIs list of dissidents to watch out for. They walk to the beat of a different drummer in New England. The descendents of revolutionary army and civil war military heroes. Tough, stern, stock. Lots of Scot blood up there still I believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 I'm certainly no fan of Bush and Cheyney, and it would be fun to see it happen, and I'm certainly not well versed in constitutional law but even though they would be holding them for other authorities, isn't that act in violation of said constitution they are trying to uphold? They do not have legal, CONSTITUTIONAL standing to do that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.