Mekong

As a New Member I wish to draw your attention to the board rules 

Privacy

Posting information which could lead to the identification of individuals is forbidden.

This rule extends to girls in the scene as well. So, no names, numbers, or identifying marks of the girls are to be disclosed here. Associating a particular girl with a particular bar is also restricted. There are a number of reasons for this, and this rule will be very strictly enforced, so do remember this when composing your posts.

With this in mind, please don't ask for, or give, recommendations about bargirls or massage parlour girls.

Suspended by Constitutional Court 

58 minutes ago, bust said:

Victorem 😊

Cladem 

2 hours ago, buffalo_bill said:

 

Mr Mekong, maybe you find the time to improve your Latin once you are heading for Songkran and might not go out anyway.

it means : Any action is the same as the reaction. " par est "  means it is the same. I was very good in Latin at school , it actually saved my bacclaureat against all probability.

 

As we seem to be heading for another bullshit-chess you are invited to respond.

 

 

Actually my Latin is Melius Quam Mediocris, and I fully understand  what Actio par est reactioni means but that is not what Sir Isaac Newton said. If you want to say it in Latin it would read Omnis actio,  aequalis et contrarian est reactio 

Einstein didn’t say E= MC Hammer did he, MLK didn’t say I have a Fantasy and Rene Descsartes did t say ai think therefore I maybe. 
 

If yo are going to attribute a quote to someone at least get it right, if one applied “Action Equals Reaction” to basic Engineering principle the results would be unknown.

But knowing for Equilibrium that there have to be equal and opposite forces, and in order to let’s say launch a 1 Tonne Rocket a force of greater than 1,000 kg thrust is required.

Expectantes respondum uestrum 

13 minutes ago, buffalo_bill said:

Every action has a reaction

 

" Actio par est reactioni "   Sir Isaac Newton, today confirmed by Sir Bubi.

Actually Newtons Third Law of Motion is Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, not just a reaction as you misquoted

5 minutes ago, Coss said:

own goal Kong

Why own goal?
Pointing out that someone is stating the obvious isn’t stating the obvious 

11 minutes ago, bust said:

It's an anagram

1 hour ago, Coss said:

Problem is, that Navarro's "Ron Varo" does not exist and is an anagram of Peter Navarro

And today’s prize for stating the obvious goes to.   ……    

I’ll say one thing about the Tariffs, Penguins etc, it’s taken all the attention off the Signals leak 

And as I said Chukiat Opaswong is talking out of his fucking arse

The $600-700 per tonne isn’t realistic pre tariff is is $597 per tonne so after tariff it will be $877 per tonne 

Take a Produce call it product (a) 

Vietnam sells for $1000

Thailand sells for $2000

After tariff 

Vietnam $1470

Thailand $2740

The price delta has fallen from 2:1 to 1.86:1, whilst still more expensive it is more competitive than previous.

What Khun Opaswong is referring to is the situation whereby Vietnam negotiate a tariff of Zero percent with USA, he is basically complaining about something which hasn’t happened 

Correct it was cheaper both pre and post tariff but using the  figures taken from the internet    Comparison

Pre Tariff

Thai Rice $425 per tonne

Viet Rice $397 per tonne 

Difference $28 

Post Tariff 

Thai Rice 37% tariff $425 x 1.37 = $582.25 per tonne

Viet Rice 47% tariff  $397 x 1.47 =  $583.59 per tonne

Difference $1.34 

So before the tariff Thai rice was 7% more expensive (where did you get 50% from)and post tariff less than 0.25% more expensive.So Thai rice has become MORE competitive not LESS and I don’t understand what Chukiat Opaswong is complaining about 

#

19 minutes ago, bust said:

That's a 9% tariff difference but if Vietnamese rice is around 50% cheaper

So Vietnamese rice is cheaper pre tariff than post tariff, Thailand will be better off not worse off 

AFAIK  Price of Vietnamese rice has not been decreased because of tariffs 

Well Chukiat Opaswong is talking out of his fucking arse since Vietnam (46%) has been hit with a higher tariff than Thailand (37%) so Thai rice exports will be cheaper than Vietnam not more expensive. You need to look at both parts of the equation before trying to con another Shinawatra into a rice buying scam.

Poor little Paetongtarm still believing tariffs applied are based on countries tariffs and not trade deficit, if only she had read my idiots guide to the idiots tariffs posted yesterday she would understand a little better, you would expect the PM of a country to have some understanding on a topic before commenting on such 

Whilst no economist myself, it is pretty clear where Trump has fucked up his calculations, he is basing Tariffs on trade deficit., the n dividing deficit by US Exports and splitting the difference 
it is Trade deficit / imports is what the US says the other country charges as a tariff.

eg China 

US exports $145b and imports $440b , so deficit is $295b

295 / 440 =0.67 or 67% split the difference by halving it 33.5 and rounding up 34 and the tariff imposed on China is 34%

Likewise EU, $370.2B Exports Imports $605.8b, deficit $235.6b  235.6 / 605.8 =0.389 or 39% divided by two and rounded up gives 20% which is the tariff imposed on EU.

I used to think that Trump wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, but hit proves that he is a complete imbecile 

6 hours ago, bust said:

You probably need to read beyond my comment to comprehend the point being made.

Why don’t you just say what the fuck you mean instead of being cryptic, or is that your way of saying that to don’t have a clue what you are on about 

The Roman Empire ended mid 5th Century, jousted started in the 11 Century, what do they have to do with each other 

7 hours ago, My Penis is hungry said:

I think we've proved previously despite your pendantic perdictions you've regularly made grammar errors yourself.

 

Ok, I was going to post some good Asian sex tourism info but can't be arsed. 

On 3/19/2025 at 5:04 PM, Palatkik said:

Adolescence [2025 TV]

Contains the classic line “Why do schools always have the same smell, Vomit, Cabbage and Masturbation “

 By definition, Roman Times are the time period in which places were under control of the Roman Empire 

Lithium-Ion Battery fires burn hotter and faster than Petrol (Correct word ) fires 

27 minutes ago, buffalo_bill said:

but he confirmed he " could not care less "

This can’t be true, this would  mean an American saying the phrase correctly.

What Americans say is “I could care less” implying that there is less to care than they actually are even thought this is not what they mean.