Hugh_Hoy

How has Palin tried to organize the world in any way? She's barely stepped foot out of the country. In the meantime, you have polarizing people like Obama and Pelosi bent on organizing my country in ways I (and many others)find extremely objectionable. And Obama and Pelosi don't really give a rat's ass what the people want or think. Folks have called Bush, Cheney and Palin vile things. Frankly, I find Pelosi and Obama to be 10x worse. I've said before, while I wouldn't condone their assassination, I wouldn't loose a wink of sleep if they were on AF One if it crashed into the mid-Atlantic. Both are as much liars as some folks like to describe Bush. They are devious, callous, and about as close to bringing unification of our diverse population as is the man in the moon. For all of the crap Obama said at the memorial service, I kept thinking "what a fucking hypocrit". And yes, I heard every word uttered by every speaker...live. Now...just why do you think Palin would blow us all up? Nevermind. Your answer would probably be as sensical and your ascribing fucking targets on a map to Palin having some measure of responsibility for a fucking nutcase taking out at least 6 innocent people. OMG ! Have you seen ANY fucking connection between that map and the perp? I doubt it very much. Don't you think our liberal media would have had it in 124 point type on the front page of every liberal rag in the world? Seriously, CW and OH...you guys need to drop Cav a PM and ask to borrow his tin hat. I'd suggest that LK do the same, but I don't think Cav's hat is big enough unless it's the size of a wine vat. ( to LK) Jeez...talk about "schizos" BTW, CW, I have no friggin idea why the map was taken off her website. Ask her or her organzation. Maybe because the election was over 2 months ago and it was no-longer applicable? I generally like Palin. As Dave32 mentioned, sometimes "annoying". But fractionally as much as fucking Pelosi and much more fuckable. Palin is refreshing when compared to the lying, 2-faced politicians who waffle on every issue. She isn't gutless to say what she thinks. That part of her shows her naievete when it comes to the polticial arena. More annoying that Mrs. Clinton? Not hardly. Certainly not as phoney. HH

You expect the liberal media to print it? Give me a break, LK. As for "ethics", I don't think you want to go there. :content: HH

Pelosi would be a great motivator (as a target) I would imagine. HH

Flash...Barry DID attend a memorial serice at Ft. Hood. Robaus...Bush explained his absence from military funerals in an interview with Stars and Stripes. He explained that he could not possibly attend every funeral of every fallen soldier and that if he attended one, he should attend all. Bush said that he preferred to personally meet privately with the families of those fallen to the extent possible. (Snopes says that he met with 100's of such families.) HH

I thought it was spelled "bair". HH :content:

Kind of like the Demoncraps, eh? (Pelosi, Biden, Hispanic, Gay/Lesbian factions) Never seen such a break-from-party group in all my years. CW...I'm beginning to think you have a secret "thing" for Sarah. You can't seem to be able to get away from her. I might be able to get an autographed photo of her sent to you. :content: Maybe laminated so you can wipe off the "sticky stuff". :hubba: HH

She was emphasized in Obama's speech at tonight's memorial gathering in Tucson tonight. HH

Not possible to separate the Tucson shooting with her "blood libel" statement. The shooting "triggered" the libtard association of the shooting with her "target map"...forgetting the previously published map sponsored by the Demoncrap National Leadership Committee and which I have previously posted. As I've stated above (maybe about page 15, here :content: ) I never heard the term before. (I've heard "blood sport" in connection with politics, but not "blood libel".) I took it to infer that the lefties were libeling her with the blood of the shooting victims. Prediction: Palin will run in the primaries next year; she might even win a caucus or two; she'll finish 4th or 5th down the line; she will NOT be on the GOP ticket...and I hope doesn't run as an independent. HH

Palin (and her family) has been the target (yes, Dave32, I get it :content: ) of redicule and almost every conceivable way to demean her. Libtards have been unrelenting in their attacks on her...even in the face of strong evidence that she is not a person to be concerned about with respect to kicking Obama's ass out of the White House. (Please note that I referred to "kicking"...in an unlethal way, I might add.) I can't imagine Pelosi, Joe Biden or Obama standing with their fingers up their noses if Rush (Olberman's counter ego) accused them of playing a part in the Tucson incident. Perhaps a White House "wine summit" featuring a "good" bottle of Mogan David or "L'Chaim" would be a good idea? Pelosi and Palin could step off 20 paces and take aim. (I'm only guessing at who would win that one; and I've been known to give "sucker bets". :content: HH

I think some folks have a "hair trigger" in coming to your conclusion. Personally, I blame the perp. HH

Probably not moreso than on her "elite" detractors. :content: Your linguist's explanation seems to make a fair assessment. For instance, I would be quite surprised to hear a member say about a Friday night meet at Los Cabos "we had a gay time" (though a ruling from OH might clarify). I doubt if Palin authored the term "blood libel" in her response; guessing that a speech writer used it and she went with it (probably not knowing the "origin" or the term). Still, I think that the words themselves (absent nexus to any historical significance)aptly describe the actions of some "news" writers, commentators and politicians (and a board member or two) who rushed to smear her with the blood of the Tucson shooting victims. HH

Israeli's and Jews sterotypically claim copyright to stuff. I'd never heard the term "blood libel" before, accordingly did not realize that it was owned by Jews. Overall, a balanced group of opinions; not surprisingly, partisan. The elite professor from that Northeastern university who thought Palin should be "publically shunned": I can see why the Northeast is liberal. I would have had as much fun with him in class as I did with my liberal-assed sociology prof who taught my juvenile delinquency class (ripped his liberal butt more than once in class and in bluebooks. 5555555555) HH

In the meantime, Palin has sent a message that is "right on". http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110112/pl_nm/us_usa_shooting_palin;_ylt=AifNdXNx2DKgo_Zkx2zo_XJvzwcF;_ylu=X3oDMTJtNWFoYTFxBGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMTEwMTEyL3VzX3VzYV9zaG9vdGluZ19wYWxpbgRjcG9zAzMEcG9zAzkEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDc2FyYWhwYWxpbmFj HH

uh, hum...minor correction. 187 is penal code section for murder. :content: HH

Some of LK's pronouncements are "killers". HH

Go back to the Scotland forum...until you get sober enough to post here. HH

Blogs and "news" accounts are over-flowing with comments regarding the alleged perp by former associates. Clearly, this was a guy who has been on "the edge" for quite some time. Drugs were apparently part of the accused's lifestyle. Ironic: Libtards make up the majority of those who would legalize drugs and are, presumably, have the highest rate of use/abuse. It has been reported that the alleged perp had attended a similar seance sponsored by/for the Congresswoman three years ago...and that he was not happy with her/her responses at that time. A simple timeline would establish that this was prior to a great deal of the polarizing vitrol spewed by both SOME liberals and conservatives alike. If the Libtards want to blame the incident on "conservatism", so be it. (Such an irrational, delusional, and non-sensical laying of blame will not explain why the perp took shots at people other than the Congresswoman.) Further, I would suggest that it would be fair to claim that Libtards could then be guilty of sanctioning/promoting "murder" on the basis of their support of abortion. HH

You've lost "it", LK. That is, if you ever had "it". While not a "Tea Party type", I certainly agree with a number of the group's principals. BTW, LK you really don't have a friggin' clue of what is in the Tea Party mind. Members have vastly different backgrounds and vastly different perspectives on a lot of issues. You can call them what you want, but I suspect you're just throwing shit against a wall and hoping some will stick. We do agree with one thing, however. We both feel that there is a lot of "anger" amongst Tea Party members...and it is something that I share with them: that is anger directed, particularly, toward the left wing of the Demoncrap Party (The Karl Marx wing, if you will.) Try as you might, LK, you can't pin this idiot's actions on the Tea Party. If you are trying to do that, you are no less ignorant and delusional than those you feel are threatening your socialist viewpoints. HH

Dave...your answer should be "no". Aside from LK's quote being "legend", LK already conceded that "clearly" there was no intent by Henry to have Becket murdered. (They, at one time,were close friends.) The world is full of idiots and psychos. "Hatemongers" can not and should not be any more responsible for the actions of those who are deranged than Henry should've been blamed for Becket's death. In other words, if it was wrong then, it would be wrong now. It's like the old "kill the umpire" thingy. (Interesting notes and a comment: The Congresswoman who was shot was a former Republican, voted against Pelosi's re-election to head the Demoncrap minority, is a supporter of the 2nd Amendment (right to bear arms), and is a gun owner herself. From what I gather, a "moderate" Demoncrap. I'm sure the motive or basis for the attack will be the subject of psychological studies of the attacker. It may turn out that "hatemongers" may have had a part in the perp selecting the Congresswoman, but I'm convinced that he could have just as easily used a schoolyard full of children as his victims as a way of satisfying his need for some kind of attention/relief from that which tortured his mind.) HH

Maybe some wetback washing dishes in the back. Arizona? Good chance. HH

Shit happens There is no way...repeat, no way-- the average wage earner can save for all of the possible bad luck one can have health-wise over the course of +/- 70 years. Organ transplants, joint replacements, cancers, various "by-pass" procedures...the list goes on and on. Then you have those who want to be hooked up to machines that will keep blood flowing and oxygen going to the lungs while they are essentially dead already. IF everybody needed to have these types of care, the piggy bank (U.S. Treasury) would probably be bankrupt in 6 months. (Wait, it already is.) Nobody promised us a life free of health problems. And nobody, including good-doers, should promise that your neighbor will be forced to pay for your problems. A person's health is not addressed in the Bill of Rights. Don't get me wrong. I feel sorry for those noted in the article. But, I don't see the country able to address everything from a hang-nail to a brain transplant. We can not all be a Six Million Dollar Man. HH

Sure, conviction rates are part of the political side of being a prosecutor. Prosecutors are normally, therefore, quite certain of the ability to convict somebody before they indict. I'm pretty sure a lot of guilty folks walk free due to a DA's uncertainty about the evidence being sufficient. On the other hand, defense attorney's aren't exactly to be held in high esteem when it comes to truth-finding. Sadly, we do find a lot of people now having their convictions overturned on DNA evidence. Sad, cuz they've spent years behind bars for crimes they may not have committed. HH

I've personally witnessed such purchases. (But I thought booze couldn't be purchased with food stamps.) Now, the parasites are issued what looks like a bank card, so they won't be "embarassed" by pulling out their coupons. It's the same old shit; Katrina handouts being used for cruises and trips to Hawaii; CA cash allotments for the "poor" in the form of bank cards being used in casinos in CA and Vegas. IMO, there's a very small percentage of these oxygen thieves who really need Government assistance (physically and mentally disabled who have no family to care for them or can not care for them). The rest can starve to death as far as I'm concerned. The is a big difference between those who are unemployable and those who choose to use what should be a "safety net" as a hammock. HH

Cent...doing that is gonna give you acne and you're gonna go blind. HH

I just love that banner on the "Turd-Out" site: "Please consider including Truth-out in your year-end charitable giving". Since when are political hacks considered charities? 55555555555555. If I had time, I'd go through this guy's propaganda paragraph by paragraph and destroy his attempt to criminalize capitalism and spread the word of Marx. But I'd be wasting my time, more than likely. As I only have 3 more hours (here) to make my "year-end" contributions, he's a tad late. I've already done my charitable giving for the year. 55555555555 As for my time, I need to sort my sock drawer and rearrange my pencil cup one more time for 2010. HH