Zaad Posted September 18, 2004 Report Share Posted September 18, 2004 Good post, Bibblies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
check_bin_krap Posted September 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 According to a Norwegian newspaper, Arsene Wenger has gone out vs. the descision to call off the game. He referrred to L'pool-Juve, when the match was played after 39 people died. The game was played because of fear for more riots. Wenger also said its a disgrace to call of a match because a referee gets a cut, and that descision could have caused riots outside the stadium. Got to say I agree 100%, there is stuff seriously wrong here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
check_bin_krap Posted September 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 Very true Bibblies. The Turks are to stage the champion leagues final They have a violent history, and never get banned. 2 Leeds supporters were killed in Turkey, there were enough signals before the match that this would happen. They even had the nerve of trying to get the return match played away from Elland Road! No punishment, and the criminals have gotten reduced sentence when the media interest died away. I am pretty sure that we would have beaten the Turks if this did not happen. You can not expect a team to perform after such a tragic event. The Turks went on to riot in Europe, winning the trophy. The English have handled hooligans excellent, there is very few cases these days. Your comment about Italians reminds me of a stabbing there also, as Leeds played the very same club as we discuss here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaad Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 "According to a Norwegian newspaper, Arsene Wenger has gone out vs. the descision to call off the game. He referrred to L'pool-Juve, when the match was played after 39 people died. The game was played because of fear for more riots. Wenger also said its a disgrace to call of a match because a referee gets a cut, and that descision could have caused riots outside the stadium. Got to say I agree 100%, there is stuff seriously wrong here. " He's very right. Of course it's a nasty incident, but it seems that this ref took things personal when he made the decision to stop the game. A very poor decision from a professional point of view. This whole ROMA incident seems to have raised a lot of questions. Interesting to see how this is going to be dealt with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elef Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Dynamo handed victory Tuesday, 21 September 2004 The UEFA Control and Disciplinary Body have decided that AS Roma's opening UEFA Champions League Group B match against FC Dynamo Kyiv will be awarded as a 0-3 forfeit victory to the Ukrainian side and that the Roma club will play their other two group stage home games behind closed doors after the abandonment of the original fixture last Wednesday. Serious incident Referee Anders Frisk was struck by a missile thrown from the stands and injured as the game reached half-time, and the match was eventually called off. In taking the decision the Control and Disciplinary Body took into account the seriousness of the nature of the incident. Mexes ban Roma?s matches at the Stadio Olimpico against Bayer 04 Leverkusen on 3 November and against Real Madrid CF on 8 December are the games to be played without spectators, while Roma player Philippe Mexes has been suspended for two matches for particularly unsporting conduct in the fixture, keeping him out of the trips to Madrid on 28 September and Leverkusen on 19 October. Appeal deadline Any appeal against the decisions of the UEFA Control and Disciplinary Body must be made by Friday 24 September midnight CET at the latest. UEFA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaad Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Roma rescues game...not quite Good for them! Sad to punish the club for its "fans" actions, but there's unfortunately no other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayjann Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 i agree that it is wrong that a Club must be punished because of what it's 'fans' do. but UEFA had no choice really,otherwise it would set a precedent in future. 'fans' could get a game called off if it wasn't going in their favour and just get it replayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaad Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 What happens in Holland, and hopefully elsewhere too, is that the club in question tries to find out who did (does) such things and give them a lifelong ban. They're put on a list and aren't allowed to enter the stadium. That's a start. Next thing they should do is exchange 'the stadium' for ANY STADIUM IN THE WORLD! Now that would help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
check_bin_krap Posted September 23, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Agree with the other posters. This was the only way to solve this problem. Yep, the clubs have to suffer if a clean up can be done. Now when do the Turks get spanked? Whats done there regulary needs strong action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.