Savittre Posted November 25, 2001 Report Share Posted November 25, 2001 Hi Guys, I got checked for syphilus, results came back negative. Is that conclusive? My meaning here is that, for example, with HIV, a check at 3 months is not conclusive. You need to do it again after 6 months have passed. Is the syph test like that too, or what? I didn't think to ask the doctor at the time, and he didn't say. Thank you very much!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomc12 Posted November 25, 2001 Report Share Posted November 25, 2001 Screening tests for syphillis are usually an RPR or VDRL. They are positive about 7 days after exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 quote: Originally posted by Savittre: Hi Guys, I got checked for syphilus, results came back negative. Is that conclusive? My meaning here is that, for example, with HIV, a check at 3 months is not conclusive. You need to do it again after 6 months have passed. Is the syph test like that too, or what? I didn't think to ask the doctor at the time, and he didn't say. Thank you very much!! I would suggest that you look at 90 days post exposure as the outside for your blood to show the infection. The following is from the CDC.gov, "The time between infection with syphilis and the start of the first symptom can range from 10-90 days (average 21 days). The primary stage of syphilis is usually marked by the appearance of a single sore (called a chancre), but there may be multiple sores. The chancre is usually firm, round, small, and painless. It appears at the spot where syphilis entered the body. The chancre lasts 3-6 weeks, and it will heal on its own. If adequate treatment is not administered, the infection progresses to the secondary stage. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savittre Posted November 26, 2001 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 Hi Guys, Thanks for the info. Now, I was tested for VDRL only- whatever that is! Not RPR. I haven't seen any symptoms either, but thanks for the 'chancre' description. Also, it's not like the lady has this disease, it's just that the doctor suggested it would be good to be checked out for it. I was at Bumrungrad, FYI. I'm wondering if I should have been checked out for RPR as well? Thank you again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomc12 Posted November 27, 2001 Report Share Posted November 27, 2001 The VDRL and RPR are both nonspecific screening tests for syphillis. I am not sure, but I believe that the VDRL is now used by government organizations and the RPR is used in a doctor's office. I don't know of any advantage of one over the other and if your VDRL was negative, I wouldn't have an RPR done. As one poster mentioned, you can have false negative results with either test, but the percentage is small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.