BadaBing Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 He's at it again , bye-bye privacy Bada Bing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 "A lawyer for the Justice Department told Ware that the government would like to have a random selection of 50,000 Web addresses and 5,000 random search requests from Google, a small fraction of the millions the government originally sought." Sure, sure...get a foot in the door. Start with 50,000 then they'll go for 100,000, then a million, a year from now when the public has lost interest they'll get access to the whole database. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadaBing Posted March 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 yup , this one caught my attension: "The erosion of privacy tends to happen incrementally," Berman said. "While no one intrusion may seem that big, over the course of the next decade or two, you might end up in a place as a society where you never thought you would be." Bada Bing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 i think internet/google/search engines usage has been monitored for years, its just official now, so what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadaBing Posted March 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 lazyphil said:i think internet/google/search engines usage has been monitored for years, its just official now, so what? So what ? : "Although the Justice Department said it doesn't want any personal information now, the victory would likely encourage far more invasive requests in the future, said University of Connecticut law professor Paul Schiff Berman, who specializes in Internet law." Bada Bing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 <<So what ? : "Although the Justice Department said it doesn't want any personal information now, the victory would likely encourage far more invasive requests in the future, said University of Connecticut law professor Paul Schiff Berman, who specializes in Internet law.">> ......and?....I repeat, so what.... should we all be scared?.......I just dont see the big deal :: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 The standard argument goes 'If you aren't doing anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.' In an ideal world that would be true. Unfortunately not everybody who works for the government is totally honest and reliable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadaBing Posted March 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 And I suppose you have no problem with them reading your emails , monitoring your bank accounts , listening to your phone calls too ? Yup , you got nothing to worry about LP. Bada Bing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Frankly I worry about the NHS, schooling, allowing the police to sort out out of control violent youths, pensions, global warming, my gas bill rising 22% soon......real stuff, real concerns :: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 You're right phil. Health, education, crime, environment....that's what government should be looking after. Not regulating people's private internet activities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.