MooNoi Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Sydney Morning Herald Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian2 Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Misleading headline by the SMH. His Majesty the King would have had nothing to do with the YouTube ban and would have almost certainly disapproved of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Good on YouTube! IMO, not a matter of "bowing" to anyone, just respect and showing good taste! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidel Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Well, I've seen the videos, and they're mostly just stupid and amateurish, so they're no loss. It would be a little different if youtube was removing videos containing valid criticism. In any case, the owners of youtube, google, have a history of complying with government requests for censorship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 Usually only in countries that have a lot of financial clout ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 what was on the videos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidel Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 Eh... some of it is kind of crude. I posted about the contents before, but KS edited the details out. Crude, insulting, sexual in nature in some cases, cartoon feet stamping on faces too, references to a movie about a planet dominated by primates.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.