ozpharlap Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 Well, I am in BKK right now, I can give you a hand ... after all, I was talking about some plot years ago, bugger me if Harrison IV came out very very similar to the plot I had laid out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddha Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 The dirty keith link is obvious slander and red herring. It makes me wonder what your stake is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebigfella Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I was aware of the dirty keith blog for a while now. According to claims made by galt, a fairly well known australian gentleman is behind it. But the notkeithsummers site is a new one on me. Pretty revealing stuff too, if it is true. It would seem hostilities have been escalated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 Looks like Galt has made himself quite a few enemies. This goes much beyond just Stickman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 At least one enemy. I wonder who it can be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I'd expect it is the folks he had court battles with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebigfella Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I must say that whatever your views about Galt, this constant insinuation (from various quarters) that he is a paedophile is pretty low. OK he has a criminal record, he used drugs and he was (gasp) involved with a sex tour company. Big deal. Saying someone is a liar, a social misfit or accusing them of jealousy is one thing. But constantly making references to him being a paedophile is just totally out of order unless you have evidence to back it up. This is not something that you accuse any man of unless you have proof. Showing a picture of a guy that he knew who was a paedophile together with pictures of little girls that he briefly commented about in his column, then using these to insinuate he is a paedophile is pretty low and disgusting. If you have proof, then show it. If you don't, then its a disgraceful accusation that is far worse than anything that Galt has printed. I am not on anyones side here, but I must say this tactic p*sses me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I'd expect it is the folks he had court battles with. I think you nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I must say that whatever your views about Galt, this constant insinuation (from various quarters) that he is a paedophile is pretty low. I tend to agree. It lowers the tone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted March 19, 2011 Report Share Posted March 19, 2011 I see very little to back up the claims either. It is the weakest section in the site - and lessens the impact of the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.