Coss

I don't know the odds on a meteor hitting us soon, but it would make a mess, that's for sure. You've hit on good point, humans would adapt, but I think what's at stake here is Al Gore's sliced white bread lifestyle. I just watched a movie 'Deep Impact' where just such an event happened, but it's OK, despite some considerable damage, Morgan Freeman led 'merica and the land of the free survived. Actually a reasonable good portrayal of what would happen. The space hijinx were bit far fetched though. I'll try and dig out some articles, I don't intend to mislead, I'll report back.

One assumes this is a 'marriage' a wedding photo - -terrible

Thanks Bust, not often I get to see a 'real' article on these matters

One or two might have good personalities, but what's with the eye widening? If it's surgical, they'll look terrible in another 15 years. Specifically number 41.

I don't argue against "CO2 increases with the use of fossil fuels" it does. I argue that the amount measured, should not make us culpably responsible for any significant amount of warming or cooling, or more change or less. There have been times in the recent (geological time frames) past, where the temperature has been much higher than it is today, but the the CO2 levels were lower, so my argument stands, the egg and chicken aspect of warming (remember we don't call it warming any more because we're not seeing too much of it) and CO2 levels, is worth examining. ​Note that I am arguing, I am presenting an opposing opinion, I don't claim the truth, I suggest the current narrative is flawed. Oh and in the spirit of entertaining debate, my lack (sometimes) of citations, could easily be countered by citations from yourself. I have a good memory and am happy to admit I'm wrong where I am shown to be so. I'd happily admit defeat in this argument if you could provide citations showing my assertions to be wrong, factually wrong. The problem is that a lot of what the media present as fact, is merely projection based belief - AlGore and the Hockey Stick graph is a prime example. citation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy Quite right, forests are large carbon sinks and "based on data from typical perennial grasslands and mature forests in Australia, forests are typically more than 10 times as effective as grasslands at storing carbon on a hectare per hectare basis." citation: http://www.chiefscie...sts-or-grasses/

likely to

You'll have to tell us what a 2LT is - 2nd Lieutenant?

A point well made. For a real long time, the world has been pouring money into these places, people like President Goodluck Jonathan, scramble to the top of the pile and take all the money, then the West is asked to give more help. The Elite of the African nations are known as the WaBenzi (how the name Wabenzi came: to snub the political and connected business honchos who had an insatiable love for Mercedes Benz and other excesses) for good reason. If President Goodluck Jonathan wanted to fix this problem, he could, but he'd have to spend, what he regards as his money, on the army to make them suitable for purpose.

Netanyahu: Israel will welcome European Jews with open arms Israeli PM issues invitation to French and other European Jews who want to emigrate to Israel in wake of Paris attacks http://www.theguardi...-jews-open-arms Est-ce mauvais goût? Googlies - Is this bad taste?

The more I think about the 800,000 years, you are quite right, what they show is significant variation of levels, with admittedly, some higher levels recently. But "The argument I have is not whether or not the planet is warming or cooling, getting more changeable or less. The argument I have is whether or not Al Gore, all the Politicians and Marketing Geniuses are correct in promulgating that man is solely and culpably responsible for any significant amount of warming or cooling, or more change or less."

Don't need no citation, logic should do it. All the permafrost in the northern climes, if or as, it melts, releases huge amounts of CO2. Now is it the CO2 being released that's driving more Melting? Or is to the Melting that's driving the CO2 release? Map of Russia permafrost http://www.emergingm...rost_russia.jpg Map of China permafrost, just a little one, but you can see the extent http://nsidc.org/fgd...ssification.gif

yes

I'm sure he's lovely, and if he were talking about the Cambo sex industry in the abstract, I wouldn't have had a problem, the issue I had, was that he accused me.

And yet cigarettes are still legal?

You are assuming that CO2 levels drive warming, there are good arguments to say warming drives CO2 levels.

10 degrees in Laos, and prolonged, not the usual 3 day chill.

Yes, very funny...

Great writing, get a new iPhone and write some more

The argument I have is not whether or not the planet is warming or cooling, getting more changeable or less. The argument I have is whether or not Al Gore, all the Politicians and Marketing Geniuses are correct in promulgating that man is solely and culpably responsible for any significant amount of warming or cooling, or more change or less. My understanding of all the arguments, pro and con, is that we're basing a lot of what is said on weather observations and other observations that only cover a small amount of time. Ergo we are measuring small swings in what may or may not be a trend.

It's been rising since the end of the last ice age, circa 10,000 yrs ago, still is. Those ancient humans must have use a lot of petrol to bring about the end of the ice age.

and from 2012... Don’t tell me Al Gore was exaggerating again! Source With high-altitude mountains in Himachal Pradesh experiencing up to 100 cm fresh snowfall in November month after 10 years, the abundance of snow on mountains has rejuvenated nearly one thousand glaciers and has ensured uninterrupted supply of water for drinking, irrigation and hydel projects. Even after years of research on glaciers and climate of Himalayas, scientists have failed to learn the pattern of the weather here. While scanty snowfall and rising temperature in last decade had sparked the possibilities of fast shrinking of glaciers, good spells of snowfall in last three years have changed the trend with glaciers almost growing to their original size. Some scientists say that despite heavy snowfall in winters, the extreme heat in summers is causing the melting of the glaciers with abnormal speed and others say extreme cold in winters is neutralizing the minor effect of risen temperature in summer. Overall, speed of melting of glaciers has reduced over the past few years only due to good snowfall in winter months. This improves even on the good news reported in February: The world’s greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows. The discovery has stunned scientists, who had believed that around 50bn tonnes of meltwater were being shed each year and not being replaced by new snowfall. The study is the first to survey all the world’s icecaps and glaciers and was made possible by the use of satellite data. Overall, the contribution of melting ice outside the two largest caps – Greenland and Antarctica – is much less than previously estimated, with the lack of ice loss in the Himalayas and the other high peaks of Asia responsible for most of the discrepancy. Bristol University glaciologist Prof Jonathan Bamber, who was not part of the research team, said: “The very unexpected result was the negligible mass loss from high mountain Asia, which is not significantly different from zero.†Not what Al Gore was saying three years ago, when he was warning of a billion people running out of water:

Another of Al Gore's detractors http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/Goreacknowledgederrors.htm

Actually I am wrong in the 2015 date for the Himalayan Glaciers "Senior members of the UN's climate science body admit a claim that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035 was unfounded" http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake But the gist of the argument is the same.

And yet, Al Gore, got a Nobel Prize for similar science, again, why have we still got Himalayan Glaciers? was, 'gasp!' Al Gore wrong?