Hugh_Hoy

Right on, my friend ! Occupy Itaewan !!! HH

And 4 years ago,in how many ads and campaign appearances did Barry look into the camera and audiences and lie to us about how his administration was going to be the most transparent, not give access to lobbyists, blah, blah, blah? HH

Ah...more jibberish from a pod somewhere in libtardland. For what it's worth, I agree with you on the above. To which I'd add, probably the ONLY rational, qualified person he's appointed. 55555555555 HH

And he would be in line to get mucho blame if he were able to pass the stuff he wants to. And it would be well-deserved. I'd love to give him enough rope to hang himself. Problem is, he would set the country on a course from which it might never recover. The country just cannot afford 4 more years of this Marxist-traitor. Was it Khruchev (sp?) who said that the commies would win from "within". Well, Obama is just a Trojan horse being presented by Pelosi, Reid and some others. McCarthy would have a field day with these pieces of shit. HH

Look Steve...pleeeeeeeeeeze stop with the standard-issue libtard rhetoric. The GOPers HAVE offered compromises; that is, agreed to some of the elements in Obama's proposed legislation. Now, if compromise means not getting all of what the Marxist-in-Chief wants, too friggin' bad. I think it's safe to say that Obama would like to tax the "wealthy" 80% if he thought that he could. Then, it would be equally safe to say he would offer a "compromise" at 79% and the libtards, if the GOP refused to accept that, would say the GOP refuses to compromise. Please be aware that even some Senate Demoncraps refuse to vote for Obama's "jobs bill". Otherwise, it would have been passed in the Senate. As it stands now, Harry Reid won't even bring Obama's proposed legislation to the floor for a vote, cuz he knows he doesn't have the votes to pass it. In the meantime, the House has passed many bills and sent them to the Senate. What does Reid do? The fuckstick puts them on the shelf. They don't even get hearings. Now, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze tell me who is obstructing who? HH

Stevo...go OWS (Occupy Walking Street) Capitalism at it's rawest and finest. (And pleeeeeeze, for your own inner-self, stay away from "move on. org". "Just say no.") Nothing good there. HH

I's day that if you are a radical fundamentalist Muslim, he's been very, very good. HH

Holy cow ! So you are the person who watches MSNBC. Pretty cool having all of those folks work for you. HH

What commie blog did you get that from? 555555555555 I think it's true that he doesn't have the network/resources that traditionally are employed in the primaries. Comes from not being in the political arena before. As for campaigning to sell a book? Crazy idea. He makes enough from his investments and his previous radio talk show. Anybody who wants to run for Prez almost MUST write a book. I've already started mine for my 2020 run. HH

Definitely some good DNA in play. I'd even jump his wife. 5555555555555 HH

Cain on top...Bachmann on bottom. Hmmmmm...interesting and provocative. HH

555555555555555 Very clever. HH

I'm thinking that this type of characterization is a "black thing". That is, limited to the black community. The first time I heard blacks put some kind of emphasis on the shades of "blackness" was when I taught at Markham (104th and Compton). I'd hear kids say to others, "yo sho is black. You as black as ....". It seemed that the more black another was, the lower on the totem pole one was. I also heard the use of the "N word" a lot. I was pretty sure that in both cases, there was an amount of "joking around" involved, cuz nobody died as a result. 55555555555 Kind of like calling a good friend an a-hole when you found out years later that he was dating "my girl" at the same time I was. LOL. One thing that puzzles me: If a person is a mulatto (Barry), why is he referred to as "black"? He has just as much "white blood" in him as "black blood". Like you said, when it comes to U.S. politics, the amount of "American" a person reflects should be much more important than the amount of light a person reflects. HH

10-4. Good luck with everything; hoping all turns out as well as can be expected. HH

Criminal case? Don't recall that. What's that about? HH

5555555555555555555 I agree that anybody who wants to be President has to be "nuts". First, 2 years of trying to get nominated by shaking hands, kissing babies, sleeping in different hotels almost every night, meetings and fund-raisers several times per week, trying to catch up on even the most basic stuff that you might be questioned about at any time, taking flack from some quarter over almost anything you might say. A candidate must be absolutely driven by ego, a feeling of a "calling" and/or selling his/her soul to the devil. On top of it all, you have some "shrink" trying to psychoanalyze you who has probably never even spent 30 minutes talking to you. 55555555555555 Then, if you are successful in getting the nomination and being elected, you spend the next two years in office without having a private life, followed by two more years campaigning all over again to get re-elected. Steverino...I think your transformation into a neo-libtard has been completed. Above, you link a "party" to Franklin's book; you've (intentionally or unintentionally)over-reached only in a way that a libtard could do. The book has nothing to do with "party". Didn't the same author do a number on GWB? HH Long Live The Tea Party !!!

Yeah funny. Would be a lot funnier if it wasn't true. I'm sure we all wish we had our own printing press like the Treasury. Between the Treasury and Fed, it's one big check-kiting scheme. One of these days, it's gonna come down like a ton of bricks. Think Greece. Of course, there are politicians who either think it can't happen here or don't give a hoot. The T Party (the greatest thing to happen in this country since the election of Ike (55555555)) has only 3 or 4 basic planks: Conserve the letter/meaning of the Constitution as written/amended; limit taxation; limited Federal government; and balance the damn budget. Pretty simple. People who don't understand that gotta be even more "simple". HH

Who is this guy? We need him in Congress ! HH

The Tea Party doesn't address social issues, so no surprise that you seem to dislike it. If you take time to read the very small list of things which are dear to the Tea Party, you will find those things to have been equally important by the "founding fathers". We have, in Obama, a neo-fuhrer who has attempted to tear up our Constitution and tear down the protections guaranteed by that document. (BTW, your percentages don't make sense, based upon the percentages of the population declaring themselves Demoncrap or Republican.) Also, our mainstream media(major newspapers and TV networks) are decidedly liberal. HH

Cav...any wonder that this bill is sponsored by a Demoncrap? Not to worry, it'll never get to the floor in the House. HH

I guess you can call "stubborness" a committment to your beliefs. That is different than "intolerance", for sure. I see in Obama both. Maybe Paul would make Cain the head of the Fed. 55555555555 Interesting article someplace on Yahoo "news". Claimed that a composite of "Newtcain" for President would be big, big trouble for Obama. jing jing (Of course, I'd vote for Joe the Plumber over Barry. Big news, no? 5555555555555) Seriously, Newt has vastly more experience overall applicable to leading the country and extremely knowledgable regarding (particularly) foreign affairs. Cain, as VP, would be expotentially an improvement over Biden. I mean, WTF has Biden contributed to the country. I know not his fault that there haven't been any foreign heads of state who have died; accordingly, no funerals to attend on behalf of the country. But he has been given the "lead" on important initiatives by the WH and nothing was ever really produced. The GOP may be fortunate or unfortunate this time around. But it is certainly blessed with having 4 or 5 potential nominees much, much better for the country than Obama. Obama has attempted to divide the country by "class"; demonizing those who have achieved success and attempting to reward laggards with the fruits of others' labors. He's a fucking Marxist. And, for those with religious backgrounds, I can easily see a viewpoint that he is an "anti-Christ" and a "devil's diciple". HH

Steve...the man, in any capacity, would bring LEADERSHIP--something that hasn't been coming from the WH during this administration. Too much "social conservatism". I'm not sure what you mean by that. Have examples of what he's said that makes you feel that way? (I'm asking as a "social moderate".) The guy is definitely a leader; I'd guess leading by "consensous"; knows when to "kick ass" and when to give a pat on the back. I think most U.S. voters have seen what a "social LIBERAL" has done to the country in the last 2 3/4 years...NOTHING GOOD ! BTW, you don't think Barry consults "experts" on stuff he doesn't know about? If he doesn't, that would explain a lot of things. 555555555555555555 (Maybe Barry just needs a new dart board or Magic 8 Ball".) HH

Substitute the name Cheney with Obama and I agree with you 100% HH

Because that would not enable the politicians to target/benefit the money to their supporters? HH

I am certain that you really do hope Paul will get the GOP nomination. But it wouldn't "shake things up". Paul's nomination would assure relection for Barry, the most incompetent, inept, unprepared President in the history of the country. We need a leader who can and will get the country rolling again. Not sure who that would be, but I'm sure Obama and the likes of Pelosi and Reid aren't the ones to do it. They've turned an out-of control backyard barbeque into a raging forest fire in 2 3/4 years. HH