Doggie-mony

[Steve]

I just heard on the radio that a Canadian man who was married with no children, divorced his wife. The couple had a St. Bernard dog. The ex wife got custody of the dog and claims it costs her $200 Canadian dollars a month to take care of the pooch. You guessed it, judge awarded her $200/month and the worst of it is he doesn't get visitation rights. The reporter on the radio said the $200/month award is 1/3 of what the average payment is for a child. I wish I had the actual article. Maybe some of our Canadian members have heard of the story and can elaborate. I tried to relay the story as accurate as possible from what I heard. If I'm missing anything please post.

 

You know what I'm thinking...I'm sure you are thinking the same and it smells like what the St. Bernard drops on the grass each day.

[carlton68]

So if the dog costs 200$ a month why does he have to pay all of it and not only half, the other half coming from her.

Why not lethal injections for the dog, the wife and first of all the judge?

[BadaBing]

If the dog has pups , does he have to pay for them also ?

[Steve]

Its more an indictment of the western judicial system than anything else. 30 years ago no divorce lawyer would dare present that motion to the court. The judge, after he stopped laughing, may even sanction him if he got a real hard ass judge.

Its the judiciary that's at fault for granting BS like this.

[BadaBing]

Agree !! , they say " it's a man's world " well it may be , until you get married ( USA law-world ) Fucking divorce lawyers , bloodsucking snakes , apologies to any fellow board members who may be of the mentioned profession if offended...