TheCorinthian Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 Or Packastan? Or with the Talaban? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,341811,00.html Just wow. I am amazed that his fellows in Queens have not burned his house down to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 Strange. I would think moderate Muslims would want him shut down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Hoy Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 "Somebody" needs to take him out. HH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian2 Posted March 27, 2008 Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 This is a right wing plot to get me to read Fox News. Not a bad site though, I'm addicted to News sites, I'll bookmark it.... arrrrggghhh (pulls hand back from mouse)... I won't... I won't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted March 27, 2008 Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 I wonder if he will or has made the pilgrimage to Mecca? Be interesting to see what happens if he did. He's still an Israeli citizen as well because he was born into the faith. He's much safer in the states than he would be if he went to Israel for a visit. Jews have joined all sorts of religion. Even in old testament days. Just like Christians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted March 27, 2008 Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 Sounds like grounds to stone the guy. How anyone who studied at a rabbinical school can believe Muhammad's "true" version of biblical history. When copying the scriptures, scribes had to count every letter to make sure none was left out. Letters also have numerical value, and the total at the end has to match the original. Mo went into sort of a trance and started speaking (like "channeling"). He got names "wrong" and "confused" biblical figures. Now you may not believe the supernatural part of the bible, but it is accepted overall by historians and archaeologists as pretty good ancient history. Muslims insist it is wrong though, since it doesn't always agree with the Qu'ranic version. Nutsy Cohen buys that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.