MaiLuk Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Dumsoda and I had a shortlived debate about whether one should say lets get "in the sack" or "on the sack". Which caused me to wonder about the extreme proliferation of different ways in the english language one can refer to copulation. Any one want to take a stab at making a list? And it would be a good idea to add in the germanic, thai or any other language so we can all know what to say no matter how drunk and where located. No smart ass comments gentleman this is extremely impiortant government work in progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumsoda Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Just for the record, my reference to "On the Sack" was referring to jumping a 100kg tart. After TG's it would be like climbing on top of a sack of Potatoes. Have no issue with ..."In the sack"...as relating to fucking, screwing, shagging, boinking, doinking...etc...etc Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaiLuk Posted July 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Ha! You attack me here!??! If one were to fuck a sack of potatoes, then one would clearly be on the sack. I have fucked bargirls whom were same same sack of potatoes, as in "she laid there like a sack of potatoes. What were we talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaiLuk Posted July 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Oh yeah. You get in the sack and if she is a 100kg african lady wandering soi 3 with puke on her shirt and a stick in her hand, then you get "in" the sack with her also. Don't see how it makes any difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumsoda Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 I'm confused :dunno: :dunno: Mai bpen rai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous_Dog Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Why would you fuck on top of a sack of potatoes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Presumably, policeman copulate. What do firemen do ... hose 'em down??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preahko Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 >Dumsoda and I had a shortlived debate about whether one should say lets get "in the sack" or "on the sack" questions of preposition in colloquial expressions like this ultimately all come down to which local dialect of english one is speaking...I'll bet this (and many others) differ greatly from, say, american english to british english to australian, etc. (many related examples spring to mind, like the british "he's in hospital" vs. american "he's in the hospital"...) even within the US, in varies: where I grew up, in the midwest, we say "stand in line" ("queue" to you brits, haha); on the east coast, they say "stand ON line"... preahko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palatkik Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 MaiLuk said:No smart ass comments gentleman this is extremely impiortant government work in progress. I would not be suprised if the list has already been made numerous times over....here's one http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wikisaurus:sexual_intercourse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boring_Man Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 MaiLuk said:Ha! You attack me here!??! If one were to fuck a sack of potatoes, then one would clearly be on the sack. I have fucked bargirls whom were same same sack of potatoes, as in "she laid there like a sack of potatoes. What were we talking about? Mmmm, potatoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.