Jump to content

Iran launches satellite into orbit


Bangkoktraveler

Recommended Posts

On the auspicious occasion of birth anniversary of Imam Mahdi (May God Hasten His Reappearance), Iran launched a new rocket to carry a satellite into orbit, IRNA reported.

 

Experts said the launching represented a potentially significant if much-delayed step in Iran's efforts to join the international space club.

 

Safir-e Omid, or Ambassador of Peace, is part of Iran's long held goal of developing a space program.

 

Safir-e Omid is a satellite to monitor natural disasters in the earthquake-prone nation and improve its telecommunications. The satellite has also data processing capability.

 

Iran hopes to launch four more satellites by 2010, the government has said.

 

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After they lied about their rockets blasting off,(Photo Shopped pics) I would be loath to buy this one.

 

You are wise to be skeptical of Iranian claims:

 

Iran satellite launch a failure: U.S. official

Aug 19, 2008

 

(Reuters) - Iran's attempt to launch a dummy satellite into orbit was a "dramatic failure" that fell far short of the country's assertions of success, a U.S. official said on Tuesday

 

"The attempted launch failed," the official said.

 

"The vehicle failed shortly after liftoff and in no way reached its intended position," the official said. "It could be characterized as a dramatic failure."

 

Iran, embroiled in a standoff with the West over its nuclear ambitions, said on Sunday it has put a dummy satellite into orbit on a home-grown rocket for the first time, using a technology that could also be used for launching weapons. Iran says it has no nuclear-weapons plans and that it seeks nuclear technology to generate electricity.

 

Iranian television showed the rocket on its launch pad, but did not show the actual lift-off.

 

"The failed launch shows that the purported Iranian space program is in its nascent stages at best -- they have a long way to go," the U.S. official said.

 

Link

 

 

Rocket science is hard!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I do not necessarily disagree with the conclusion, why is the source of this article attributed to an anonymous "US official?" If we are so sure, then name sources...unless they have something to hide. Par for the pathetic course for this Admin -- even when they get it right, they do it wrong.

 

Cheers,

SD -- anonymous = propaganda in my book

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...