Jump to content

Army Captain becomes a woman


teddy

Recommended Posts

Why my hurt feelings are worth £250,000, by the para who became a woman

 

By The Daily Mail

 

To put it bluntly, the military uniform once so proudly won by Captain Ian Hamilton no longer fits.

 

It is packed away, out of sight, in a wardrobe, along with the paratrooper's red beret, and the medals of service which document how he served in every major conflict of the past 20 years.

 

Why he can no longer wear it - and, moreover, who is to blame for that fact - is a matter of much controversy.

 

article-1023168-016F244500000578-976_224x502.jpg

 

 

article-1023168-016F23B300000578-209_224x502.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

At the most basic level, it doesn't fit because he is no longer Captain Ian Hamilton, but now goes by the name of Jan. His once-rugged 16-stone body, with its famed 14-inch biceps, is no more, replaced - after a sex change operation - by a surgically created feminine physique.

 

More contentiously, Captain Hamilton is no longer entitled to wear the uniform, or even a scaled-down version of it. Fifteen months ago, when he informed the Army that he was now living as a woman, and would like to be known henceforth as Jan, his Army career effectively came to an end.

Poised to accept a posting to Gibraltar, as a media relations manager within the British Army, he wrote to his commanding officer with legal documentation detailing the sex change. The Army's response was an order to attend a medical examination - as a man. When Jan refused, the job offer was revoked, and his career in the Army was over.

A baffling - and, admittedly, eyebrow-raising - turn of events, one might conclude. How odd that a man who wanted to be a woman with such passion should sign himself up to the Parachute Regiment, that most macho of institutions. But such things happen. Yet, the matter didn't end there.

Captain Hamilton - by now officially a woman - took things further, claiming sex discrimination. And she has won her case. This week, it emerged that Jan, 43, is set to receive a huge settlement as compensation for her loss of earnings, lost pension and what in this enlightened age we must refer to as 'hurt feelings'.

 

Although the employment tribunal dealing with the case has yet to finalise the figure, it is rumoured that it will top £250,000. Whatever, it will almost certainly dwarf those payments which have to date been awarded to wounded war heroes.

 

The Ministry of Defence awards just £28,750 to a serviceman blinded in one eye, £57,000 for the loss of a leg, and £285,000 for the loss of both arms or legs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a guy on the radio the other day lamenting about his jealousy of Brad Pitt and said "..not only is he the world's most handsome man, he's the worlds 3rd prettiest woman..."

 

I'll admit it wouldn't take being drunk for 'her' to fool me. As note, usually they turn out to be ugly women. Once I found out, 'she'd' have to die of course. Dems da rules where I come from. :surprised:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the employment tribunal dealing with the case has yet to finalise the figure, it is rumoured that it will top £250,000. Whatever, it will almost certainly dwarf those payments which have to date been awarded to wounded war heroes.

 

The Ministry of Defence awards just £28,750 to a serviceman blinded in one eye, £57,000 for the loss of a leg, and £285,000 for the loss of both arms or legs.

 

I once thought that craziness like this only happened in the US. Irrationality like this boggles one's mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the US Army this would have brought an immediate court martial, conviction and dismissal "for the good of the service". Military personnel are required to keep themselves fit for their job. This soldier obviously did not.

 

£250,000 for self inflicted "damage"? Money for "loss of earnings, lost pension"? That money and pension have to be EARNED. It's not a right simply because one elisted or once held a commission. Maybe there won't "always be an England", if this kind of idiocy prevails.

 

Come to think of it, maybe I should sue for MY Army pension. Just because I didn't put in the minimum 20 years is no reason not to give it to me.

 

:p

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...