Guest lazyphil Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 regardless of your pov of ry its very churlish and petty your repatative name calling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paillote Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Removed post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paillote Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Again, you're so right, these instances are examples of a nation in decline. Well done RY, you are truly an intellectual colossus. I think those newsclippings were very intriguing. Your response on the other hand, says a lot more about your intelectual capacity, than anybody else. Paillote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Again, you're so right, these instances are examples of a nation in decline. Well done RY, you are truly an intellectual colossus. The evidence of decline is the fact that anyone still buys the Mail or Sun. A bit like us quoting the National Enquirer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faustian Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 regardless of your pov of ry its very churlish and petty your repatative name calling. I'm simply aping the ape....interesting that you haven't called RY on it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faustian Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Again' date=' you're so right, these instances are examples of a nation in decline. Well done RY, you are truly an intellectual colossus. [/quote']The evidence of decline is the fact that anyone still buys the Mail or Sun. A bit like us quoting the National Enquirer. Indeed and fully agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faustian Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Again' date=' you're so right, these instances are examples of a nation in decline. Well done RY, you are truly an intellectual colossus. [/quote'] I think those newsclippings were very intriguing. Your response on the other hand, says a lot more about your intelectual capacity, than anybody else. Paillote I was being sarcastic and whilst that is the lowest form of wit, it amuses me. I'd question your intellectual capacity, regarding finding clippings from The Sun and The Daily Mail intriguing. They are commonly regarded as appalling newspapers and appeal to working class, lowest common denominator types. They are also generally conservative and highly biased in their reporting, which anyone with a modicum of intelligence knows about. Finally, learn to spell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lazyphil Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 <> You toffy nosed, stuck up pompous, privilidged snob (btw, i'm working class and the only paper worth reading is the Angling Times:smirk: , other than this i never buy newspapers, just read left overs or read online--they ALL have agendas ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted July 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 The evidence of decline is the fact that anyone still buys the Mail or Sun. A bit like us quoting the National Enquirer. Are you suggesting that the reportage here is inaccurate? If the Sun and/or Mail are accurately reporting significant events then why shouldn't someone quote them? These events either occurred or else they didn't. They are either significant or else they aren't. The source is not directly relevant, just the accuracy and significance. Try to raise your game a bit here please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted July 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 I'd question your intellectual capacity, regarding finding clippings from The Sun and The Daily Mail intriguing. They are commonly regarded as appalling newspapers and appeal to working class, lowest common denominator types. They are also generally conservative and highly biased in their reporting, which anyone with a modicum of intelligence knows about. So why don't you demonstrate your superior intellect by pointing out a single specific shortcoming of any of the four quoted reports? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.