HeartThais Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 -> Having been adopted I am strongly against "easy way out" abortion.... Having been conceived, I'm strongly against contraceptives... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BelgianBoy Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 The mother and child were later reunited and both were said to be recovering in hospital. I dont get that, first she dumps the kid, kid is found, and now they are reunited ???? The baby does not deserve a mum like that..... BB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drogon Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Seems that "reunited" is the litteral meaning. AFP/Reuters: The woman dumped the baby in the plane's lavatories. She was found when trying to exit the airport with her bloody clothes. Nobody knew she had given birth inflight and nobody understands how she succeeded in boarding the plane. So they are "reunited" at the hospital... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bust Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Maybe she didn't even know she was preggo Has happened before and considering she was a Samoan woman and the airport staff didn't detect she was pregnant and allowed her to board the flight says something. Now if she was a "Big" Samoan woman it's quiet believable her pregnancy was a mystery to all. Some of those woman are huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsmedave Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 The real question is did the airline just charge her for an additional item of baggage or for an extra full fare seat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Marty is on the right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Where wolf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drogon Posted March 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 wolfenstein? Poor child, really crappy way to start his life, no matter the reason she did that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torneyboy Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 That is for sure... :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torneyboy Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 The real question is did the airline just charge her for an additional item of baggage or for an extra full fare seat? Qantas would have .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.