chuckwoww Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Any theories about why Foxman and Dershowitz let her off the hook? Those two are like the voice of Moses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Didn't Dershowitz also defend O.J? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 "... And seriously, all this stuff about cross-hairs on a political map and tying it into a schizo killing someone, is reaching..." Is it? What was the "real message" she was "trying" to say? Her rhetoric is indeed very similar, or could logically be considered as such, to that of Metzger, who went a step beyond implying people be killed, and just called for it. He claimed free speech as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Didn't Dershowitz also defend O.J? Apellate advisor if I remember right. He likes high profile cases. Calls himself a liberal. Approves of torture. Puzzles me a bit how quickly he jumped to Palin's defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Maybe she is "pro Israel?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 She definitely is. I guess that's reason enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I suspect Giffords is too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave32 Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 "...And seriously, all this stuff about cross-hairs on a political map and tying it into a schizo killing someone, is reaching..." Is it? What was the "real message" she was "trying" to say? Her rhetoric is indeed very similar, or could logically be considered as such, to that of Metzger, who went a step beyond implying people be killed, and just called for it. He claimed free speech as well. Yes, it IS reaching. You guys are seriously unfucking believable. Her rhetoric is not logically the same as Metzgers, and if you construe it as such.... yeah. I could probably dig up several of your palin hating posts and twist them to something you didn't intend. And then turn you into the authorities like a good little sheep and say your logic is 'just like Metzgers' You disappoint OH. Metzger. Get the fuck outta here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave32 Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 HH, I'm seriously considering going conservative. Oh, and I love Chuck's proclamation of Dershowitz an endorser of torture now. The irony is, Palin sucks already. But you guys do exactly what you're accusing the other side of doing with these ridiculous claims. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I don't know Dave. You seem like a bright guy but you sure like to shoot from the hip. Where does it say somebody who finds Palin interesting/amusing must hate her? Just google Dershowitz and torture OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now