BaronTT Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Intentionally only 3 choices, with no 'other'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimDidMeGood Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Can't vote. Problem is that except 2, your options IMO don't represent the existing reasonable possibilities. If it were that simple, Gov't would have done it already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pom Michael Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 I voted 3 (no surprise) but with caveats. Use overwhelming force (number of troops, armored vehicles, non-lethal means as much as possible) - but stop when you have the main rally stage surrounded - allow those remaining to leave into temporary custody - then close out the ones who won't quit. good luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gladius69 Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Option #4 Sonic weapons (which they probably don't have) and surgically take out everyone in black. Send in massive amounts of relief ASAP to take care of the people. Offer amnesty liberally to non-lethal protesters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Hi, I voted 3 (no surprise) but with caveats. Use overwhelming force (number of troops, armored vehicles, non-lethal means as much as possible) - but stop when you have the main rally stage surrounded - allow those remaining to leave into temporary custody - then close out the ones who won't quit. good luck Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiHome Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Can't vote. Problem is that except 2, your options IMO don't represent the existing reasonable possibilities. If it were that simple, Gov't would have done it already. Oh, you must mean agree to a election date, free access for all to campaign anywhere in the country. Independent investigation of April 10. Responsible media coverage of the campaign. If those sound ok to you, why did the reds not take them a week ago before they unleased the thugs outside the barricades. TH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronTT Posted May 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Yes, it's not simple. I purposely did not give many choices because there are about as many potential solutions as there are people. Basically, the choices are 2 extremes and the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acockasian Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 TH- Now I am agreeing with you - this is complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stickman Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Option 3 for sure....and they should have done it before now, I reckon... I don't think it helped to let the reds become so entrenched, but then there may be reasons they waited which we wouldn't know about / understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronTT Posted May 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 It's all your fault! They would have given up long ago if you hadn't gone behind the lines and given them moral support! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.