spirit_of_town_hall Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 **content edited, see last post in thread** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 Hi, The thread in question had run its course, and Gummigut did not lose the discussion, he gave up on trying to make you understand that you are wrong. Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spirit_of_town_hall Posted June 12, 2004 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 **content edited, see last post in thread** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 "gummigut said they would, I said they wouldnt and reitereated that " I lean on Spirit's side, i wonder where Gummigut got his information on thai immigration going after someone because of his troubles with the banking system abroad... Was it Suadum who wrote that?? I totally share the lack of sympathy for most people crawling under credit anyway. They often act very irresponsibly in the first place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
check_bin_krap Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 So your thread was closed. Did you take it up with the moderator or KS in a PM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USVirgin Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 While we're being anal, why don't we discuss moving this thread to the 'suggestions' folder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted June 12, 2004 Report Share Posted June 12, 2004 AmoresPerros said:i wonder where Gummigut got his information on thai immigration going after someone because of his troubles with the banking system abroad... Was it Suadum who wrote that?? I plead not guilty, yer honor! I have no knowledge of shysters and their international legal/financial problems . Cheers, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gummigut Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 spirit_of_town_hall: You got a problem with the moderation, recourse is outlined and available. Calling out publicly for me to get a "verbal spanking" is puerile. Thus the content of your messages in this thread have been removed as you have NOT added anything to your argument as you have not stated anything new. WHICH is the reason why I closed the last thread. If you haven't been listening to my reasons for my actions, let me just say again, You stated NOTHING NEW. To give you some insight on the moderation here: "The thread was censored as it sailed close to the law, that is fair enough." Fair enough? Hah. A significant % of the moderators wanted your original message with your idea removed immediately. I was the one who fought to have your original post shown and not to delete the thread. Why? Because it's a bad idea, lol. Here is how I am going to moderate any more posts with regards to this cacamamy scheme. I'm going to remove any new threads when I see them. If anyone has anything really significant to add, they can send me a PM. Again, if anyone has problems with the moderation, recourse is outlined. In fact it should be widely known for long time board members (STH). Not following proper procedure is not appreciated. <<burp>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.