Mekong Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 I thought Osama had rented out his summer palace to Takky! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Central Scrutinizer Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Isn't that where those taliban cunts blew up the ancient buddha statues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Spotters Badge for Cent It is indead the empty cave where the Buddahs of Bamyan once stood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 [Photo of a smaller reconstruction] << The main bodies were hewn directly from the sandstone cliffs, but details were modeled in mud mixed with straw, coated with stucco. This coating, practically all of which was worn away long ago, was painted to enhance the expressions of the faces, hands and folds of the robes; the larger one was painted carmine red and the smaller one was painted multiple colors. >> << They were intentionally dynamited and destroyed in 2001 by the Taliban, on orders from leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, after the Taliban government declared that they were "idols" (which are forbidden under Sharia law). >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamyan I remember in the mid 1980s when the Saudis found a Roman Empire outpost in western Saudi Arabia. There were ruins of the town, a small amphitheatre etc. The Saudis took care of the foreign infidel site, destroying all traces with bulldozers. Inshallah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 OT. Thailand will ask Interpol politely to cooperate. Does this mean Interpol will have to say something? Thailand to ask Interpol to 'seek Thaksin arrest' (AFP) – 8 hours ago BANGKOK  The Thai government said Thursday it would request Interpol's co-operation to arrest fugitive ex-prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra on terrorism charges in connection with recent deadly protests. The request for help from the international police agency would be sent "so any country that knows of his whereabouts can notify Thailand, so Thailand can begin the extradition procedure," said deputy prime minister Suthep Thaugsuban. Thaksin, who was ousted in a 2006 coup and lives in self-imposed exile to avoid a jail term for corruption, said in a phone interview Wednesday that Interpol would recognise the accusations were "politically motivated". Thailand's Criminal Court approved an arrest warrant for Thaksin on Tuesday after the government accused him of inciting unrest and bankrolling the rallies by opposition "Red Shirt" protesters, many of whom seek his return to power. The Reds' street rallies, which were broken up last week by the army, paralysed central Bangkok and sparked several outbreaks of violence that left 88 people dead since mid-March, mostly civilians, and nearly 1,900 injured. "The Department of Special Investigation, the Attorney General's office and the foreign ministry agreed to send the request to Interpol to issue an alert that Thaksin is wanted on terrorism charges in Thailand," Suthep said. "If Thaksin thinks that he's innocent he can come to prove himself," he told reporters. Speaking to Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Wednesday, Thaksin insisted he had advocated peaceful protests, and "never, never supporting any violence." "Interpol have their own criteria to judge, that is... to not be politically motivated. This is clearly politically motivated and there is no ground," he said in English. If found guilty, Thaksin could in theory face the death penalty, but the warrant appears aimed at boosting attempts to extradite the tycoon-turned-premier, who has found sanctuary in several countries. Thaksin's lawyers have asked the court to revoke the warrant, while the Thai government has exerted pressure on countries he has visited and to which he has moved to freeze his finances. A Montengrin source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Thaksin was due back in the Adriatic state Wednesday after a quick trip to Cyprus and had been asked by Montenegro to avoid making any public comments during his stay. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jEiwiO_fzfwgDDG6syxiW2MnumXw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Thaksin, who was ousted in a 2006 coup I am getting bored with this lie. Thaksin was NOT Ousted by 2006 Coup, he was caretaker PM who could not form a coalition Government since April 2006 Elections and refused to call new elections. I wish people would stop bullshitting and the western press is the worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Well don't shoot the messenger. I'm mainly interested in what Interpol is going to do about him as per thread title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallenda Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 OT. Thailand will ask Interpol politely to cooperate. Does this mean Interpol will have to say something? Dunno if they are required to reply -- I think unless there's some smoking gun (as has been alluded to, but notice that the govt hasn't said squat about it, which leads me to believe it's just a rumor) then I wouldn't expect anything to happen as a result. And even if there is a smoking gun, I could see Montenegro playing games with it forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckwoww Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 I don't think Interpol will touch it with a bargepole. But I'd like to hear their excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekong Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 I don't think Interpol will touch it with a bargepole. But I'd like to hear their excuse. Since you are too lazy click a limk SECURITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTS WIDE-RANGING ANTI-TERRORISM RESOLUTION; CALLS FOR SUPPRESSING FINANCING, IMPROVING INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Resolution 1373 (2001) Also Creates Committee to Monitor Implementation Reaffirming its unequivocal condemnation of the terrorist acts that took place in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on 11 September, the Security Council this evening unanimously adopted a wide-ranging, comprehensive resolution with steps and strategies to combat international terrorism. By resolution 1373 (2001) the Council also established a Committee of the Council to monitor the resolution’s implementation and called on all States to report on actions they had taken to that end no later than 90 days from today. Under terms of the text, the Council decided that all States should prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism, as well as criminalize the wilful provision or collection of funds for such acts. The funds, financial assets and economic resources of those who commit or attempt to commit terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts and of persons and entities acting on behalf of terrorists should also be frozen without delay. The Council also decided that States should prohibit their nationals or persons or entities in their territories from making funds, financial assets, economic resources, financial or other related services available to persons who commit or attempt to commit, facilitate or participate in the commission of terrorist acts. States should also refrain from providing any form of support to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts; take the necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist acts; deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, commit terrorist acts and provide safe havens as well. By other terms, the Council decided that all States should prevent those who finance, plan, facilitate or commit terrorist acts from using their respective territories for those purposes against other countries and their citizens. States should also ensure that anyone who has participated in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice. They should also ensure that terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the seriousness of such acts is duly reflected in sentences served. By further terms, the Council decided that States should afford one another the greatest measure of assistance for criminal investigations or criminal proceedings relating to the financing or support of terrorist acts. States should also prevent the movement of terrorists or their groups by effective border controls as well. Also by the text, the Council called on all States to intensify and accelerate the exchange of information regarding terrorist actions or movements; forged or falsified documents; traffic in arms and sensitive material; use of communications and technologies by terrorist groups; and the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction. States were also called on to exchange information and cooperate to prevent and suppress terrorist acts and to take action against the perpetrators of such acts. States should become parties to, and fully implement as soon as possible, the relevant international conventions and protocols to combat terrorism. By the text, before granting refugee status, all States should take appropriate measures to ensure that the asylum seekers had not planned, facilitated or participated in terrorist acts. Further, States should ensure that refugee status was not abused by the perpetrators, organizers or facilitators of terrorist acts, and that claims of political motivation were not recognized as grounds for refusing requests for the extradition of alleged terrorists. The Council noted with concern the close connection between international terrorism and transnational organized crime, illicit drugs, money laundering and illegal movement of nuclear, chemical, biological and other deadly materials. In that regard, it emphasized the need to enhance the coordination of national, subregional, regional and international efforts to strengthen a global response to that threat to international security. Reaffirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, the Council expressed its determination to take all necessary steps to fully implement the current resolution. The meeting, which began at 10:50 p.m., adjourned at 10:53 p.m. Resolution The full text of resolution 1373 (2001) reads as follows: “The Security Council, “Reaffirming its resolutions 1269 (1999) of 19 October 1999 and 1368 (2001) of 12 September 2001, “Reaffirming also its unequivocal condemnation of the terrorist attacks which took place in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on 11 September 2001, and expressing its determination to prevent all such acts, “Reaffirming further that such acts, like any act of international terrorism, constitute a threat to international peace and security, “Reaffirming the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence as recognized by the Charter of the United Nations as reiterated in resolution 1368 (2001), “Reaffirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, “Deeply concerned by the increase, in various regions of the world, of acts of terrorism motivated by intolerance or extremism, “Calling on States to work together urgently to prevent and suppress terrorist acts, including through increased cooperation and full implementation of the relevant international conventions relating to terrorism, “Recognizing the need for States to complement international cooperation by taking additional measures to prevent and suppress, in their territories through all lawful means, the financing and preparation of any acts of terrorism, “Reaffirming the principle established by the General Assembly in its declaration of October 1970 (resolution 2625 (XXV)) and reiterated by the Security Council in its resolution 1189 (1998) of 13 August 1998, namely that every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, “Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, “1. Decides that all States shall: “(a) Prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts; “( Criminalize the wilful provision or collection, by any means, directly or indirectly, of funds by their nationals or in their territories with the intention that the funds should be used, or in the knowledge that they are to be used, in order to carry out terrorist acts; “© Freeze without delay funds and other financial assets or economic resources of persons who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts; of entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons; and of persons and entities acting on behalf of, or at the direction of such persons and entities, including funds derived or generated from property owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons and associated persons and entities; “(d) Prohibit their nationals or any persons and entities within their territories from making any funds, financial assets or economic resources or financial or other related services available, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of persons who commit or attempt to commit or facilitate or participate in the commission of terrorist acts, of entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by such persons and of persons and entities acting on behalf of or at the direction of such persons; “2. Decides also that all States shall: “(a) Refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists; “( Take the necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist acts, including by provision of early warning to other States by exchange of information; “© Deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens; “(d) Prevent those who finance, plan, facilitate or commit terrorist acts from using their respective territories for those purposes against other States or their citizens; “(e) Ensure that any person who participates in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice and ensure that, in addition to any other measures against them, such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts; “(f) Afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal investigations or criminal proceedings relating to the financing or support of terrorist acts, including assistance in obtaining evidence in their possession necessary for the proceedings; “(g) Prevent the movement of terrorists or terrorist groups by effective border controls and controls on issuance of identity papers and travel documents, and through measures for preventing counterfeiting, forgery or fraudulent use of identity papers and travel documents; “3. Calls upon all States to: “(a) Find ways of intensifying and accelerating the exchange of operational information, especially regarding actions or movements of terrorist persons or networks; forged or falsified travel documents; traffic in arms, explosives or sensitive materials; use of communications technologies by terrorist groups; and the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist groups; “( Exchange information in accordance with international and domestic law and cooperate on administrative and judicial matters to prevent the commission of terrorist acts; “© Cooperate, particularly through bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such acts; “(d) Become parties as soon as possible to the relevant international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, including the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism of 9 December 1999; “(e) Increase cooperation and fully implement the relevant international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism and Security Council resolutions 1269 (1999) and 1368 (2001); “(f) Take appropriate measures in conformity with the relevant provisions of national and international law, including international standards of human rights, before granting refugee status, for the purpose of ensuring that the asylum seeker has not planned, facilitated or participated in the commission of terrorist acts; “(g) Ensure, in conformity with international law, that refugee status is not abused by the perpetrators, organizers or facilitators of terrorist acts, and that claims of political motivation are not recognized as grounds for refusing requests for the extradition of alleged terrorists; “4. Notes with concern the close connection between international terrorism and transnational organized crime, illicit drugs, money-laundering, illegal arms-trafficking, and illegal movement of nuclear, chemical, biological and other potentially deadly materials, and in this regard emphasizes the need to enhance coordination of efforts on national, subregional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen a global response to this serious challenge and threat to international security; “5. Declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations; “6. Decides to establish, in accordance with rule 28 of its provisional rules of procedure, a Committee of the Security Council, consisting of all the members of the Council, to monitor implementation of this resolution, with the assistance of appropriate expertise, and calls upon all States to report to the Committee, no later than 90 days from the date of adoption of this resolution and thereafter according to a timetable to be proposed by the Committee, on the steps they have taken to implement this resolution; “7. Directs the Committee to delineate its tasks, submit a work programme within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution, and to consider the support it requires, in consultation with the Secretary-General; “8. Expresses its determination to take all necessary steps in order to ensure the full implementation of this resolution, in accordance with its responsibilities under the Charter; “9. Decides to remain seized of this matter.†Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.