Jump to content

Saying It As It Is


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Want to join my gang .. Free to join, no monthy contributions, and none of the problems of the other lot.

 

Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership

 

Nice to cut, copy and paste something but do you actually understand what the TPP represents?

And don't just google it for your answer like you usually do and as you did with your assessment of the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Nice to cut, copy and paste something but do you actually understand what the TPP represents?

 

Agreements to make it easier to trade with the each other perhaps

 

" And don't just google it for your answer like you usually do and as you did with your assessment of the EU."

 

Why not, I do it all the time, supprising what you learn ........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or surpising what you learn you

 

Agreements to make it easier to trade with the each other perhaps

 

 

In other words yet again you post a comment knowing or understanding nothing about what you are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect example of TPP. The Thais are welcome to it.

 

Constitutional law (Cth) — Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(xxxi) — Constitutional guarantees — Express limits on Commonwealth legislative power — Implied limits on Commonwealth legislative power — Acquisition of property on just terms — Plaintiffs' hold trade marks some of which registered under Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ("Trade Marks") — Plaintiffs were entitled to use Trade Marks for tobacco products and packaging of tobacco products — Plaintiffs' hold copyright in distinctive tobacco packaging ("Copyright Works") — Plaintiffs' registered owner of tobacco packaging designs registered under Designs Act 2003 (Cth) ("the Designs") — Plaintiffs' hold patents relating to form of tobacco products registered pursuant to Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ("the Patents") — Plaintiffs' tobacco products use distinctive trade dress and get up which utilise the Trade Marks and/or reproduce Copyright Works ("the Get Up") — The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (Cth) ("the Packaging Act") regulates and standardises retail packaging and appearance of tobacco products — Section 15 of the Packaging Act provides, inter alia, that the Act does not apply to the extent (if any) that its operation would result in an unconstitutional acquisition of property from a person otherwise than on just terms — Whether the Packaging Act would, but for the operation of s 15, result in unconstitutional acquisition of plaintiffs' property comprising the Trade Marks, Copyright Works, the Get Up, licensing goodwill, the Designs, the Patents, packaging goodwill, packaging rights and intellectual property licence rights ("the Property") otherwise than on just terms — Whether by reason of s 15 the Packaging Act's operative provisions do not apply to and have no operation with respect to the Property — Whether the Packaging Act impermissibly confers legislative power upon judiciary — Whether if by purporting to identify the circumstances to which it validly applies the Packaging Act falls outside the scope of legislative power conferred by s 51(xxxi) — Whether the Packaging Act invalid because its purported enactment did not involve an exercise of legislative power to make "laws" conferred by s 51(xxxi).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is good enough for me ... :)

 

." Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership "

 

 

" And don't just google it for your answer like you usually do and as you did with your assessment of the EU "

 

 

Overview. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) aims to create a regional free trade agreement involving 12 Asia Pacific countries: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, ...

 

 

 

" And don't just google it for your answer like you usually do and as you did with your assessment of the EU "

 

But yours is a better version :)

 

Constitutional law (Cth) — Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(xxxi) — Constitutional guarantees — Express limits on Commonwealth legislative power — Implied limits on Commonwealth legislative power — Acquisition of property on just terms — Plaintiffs' hold trade marks some of which registered under Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ("Trade Marks") — Plaintiffs were entitled to use Trade Marks for tobacco products and packaging of tobacco products — Plaintiffs' hold copyright in distinctive tobacco packaging ("Copyright Works") — Plaintiffs' registered owner of tobacco packaging designs registered under Designs Act 2003 (Cth) ("the Designs") — Plaintiffs' hold patents relating to form of tobacco products registered pursuant to Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ("the Patents") — Plaintiffs' tobacco products use distinctive trade dress and get up which utilise the Trade Marks and/or reproduce Copyright Works ("the Get Up") — The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (Cth) ("the Packaging Act") regulates and standardises retail packaging and appearance of tobacco products — Section 15 of the Packaging Act provides, inter alia, that the Act does not apply to the extent (if any) that its operation would result in an unconstitutional acquisition of property from a person otherwise than on just terms — Whether the Packaging Act would, but for the operation of s 15, result in unconstitutional acquisition of plaintiffs' property comprising the Trade Marks, Copyright Works, the Get Up, licensing goodwill, the Designs, the Patents, packaging goodwill, packaging rights and intellectual property licence rights ("the Property") otherwise than on just terms — Whether by reason of s 15 the Packaging Act's operative provisions do not apply to and have no operation with respect to the Property — Whether the Packaging Act impermissibly confers legislative power upon judiciary — Whether if by purporting to identify the circumstances to which it validly applies the Packaging Act falls outside the scope of legislative power conferred by s 51(xxxi) — Whether the Packaging Act invalid because its purported enactment did not involve an exercise of legislative power to make "laws" conferred by s 51(xxxi).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" TPP is farking awful

 

Where on earth have got the idea I would have thought this good , I posted the picture and text as joke about it

 

I really hate to say this ........ but this is the first time I have ever agreed with you..


  •  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" In other words yet again you post a comment knowing or understanding nothing about what you are saying "

 

Sorry .. :bow: You have made me laugh thanks for posting :) problem is your serious ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" In other words yet again you post a comment knowing or understanding nothing about what you are saying "

 

Sorry .. :bow: You have made me laugh thanks for posting :) problem is your serious ......

 

You really are not very smart are you. I posted that reference as to why the TPP is a bad idea.

Do a bit more googling and you may get the message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...