bibblies Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 They're still not coming out automatically for me. Isn't it better to use <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=TIS-620"> ? Check http://www.easyhome.in.th/technical/tricks.htm for answers. Now there's a Thai translation challenge. (Personally, I cheated and just viewed the source of the page to see what header he used.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Hi, "Isn't it better to use ?" I think I tried that one as well, but did not seem to make any difference Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gawguy Posted December 12, 2003 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 khunsanuk said:Hi, Fixed. You might need to manually switch your characater encoding though. Sanuk! How do I do this?? GG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted December 13, 2003 Report Share Posted December 13, 2003 OK, let's try this again (last post didn't post!) For IE6 or Opera5, go to the top menu bar: View>Encoding>Thai. For Netscape7, go to the top menu bar: View>Character Coding>Thai I have found that I have to change it for each page where I want to read or post Thai characters. It seems to reset itself each mouse click. Annoying, but easy to do. Cheers, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 Hi, Yep, that about sums it up. I am still confused as to why it doesn't do this automatically though, I am sure it used to. Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 14, 2003 Report Share Posted December 14, 2003 >> I am still confused as to why it doesn't do this automatically though, I am sure it used to. << Yep. I remember some members using Thai/ Japanese script in their signature too and it was displayed properly without having the need to switch the client-char-set (btw., I am using Mozilla 1.6b). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 When I looked at the source on your page, it has: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-874" /> rather than: <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-874">. I guess the extra forward slash in your version shouldn't make a difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 Hi, The extra forward slash is there to make it XHTML compliant. Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted December 15, 2003 Report Share Posted December 15, 2003 Spoke to Jigger last night whilst we both were drinking the generous Mr Rovingeye's fine tequila . He said that he would look at the old board to see what is different. Cheers, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straycat Posted December 28, 2003 Report Share Posted December 28, 2003 KS, Wasn't the charset set to Unicode before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.