BadaBing Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 hmmmm , make me think if Roman Polanski is shaking his head now asking himself if doing a " runner " was so smart afterall... Bada :: Bing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobbledonk Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 If nothing else, Jackson is guilty of gross stupidity. If you knew that scumbag parents were circling in the hopes of suing you, would you even allow these parasites within 50km of your home ? He dodged a bullet before, then put himself straight back in the firing line : that speaks volumes of his physical need to be around young boys. Whether its physical or emotional, he clearly scarred some of these kids, just as his own family scarred him back when he was 'Little Michael' in the Jackson 5. Reportedly penniless and owing money, this is one sad way to end your career, especially when you consider that he could have had almost any woman in America at one stage. He needs to check himself into some sort of therapy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Le_Rude Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Michael Jackson - gee, he sure looks guilty to me. but that is just my impression. Where will he live since he sold the Nevernever Land ranch?? Baretta was found not guilty? damn??!! Is there no justice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentors Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 lazyphil said:I think Jacko is innocent, a bloody idiot sleeping with boys but I think those boys parents are vultures and now have zero to show for their long wait in the baking sun! think, he is innocent - but if he is paedophil, so, he can leave the USA and move to Cambodia. It would be interesting to see in Phnom Penh a live concert with Michael and Gary! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I wasn't surprised, judging from the calibre of the prostitution's witnesses. I can't believe the prostituting attorneys went ahead using such flawed accusers. The jury speaks: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005270267,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Let me add, in addition to him being guilty, and deserving of the most retched treatment, so too should the parents of these kids... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khwaimaisabai Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Flashermac said:. the prostitution's witnesses. .......the prostituting attorneys..... Hi mac, Was this a slip of the fingers on the keyboard, or a comment on the real motivation of the boys and parents? Khwai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shotover Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Old Hippie said:Let me add, in addition to him being guilty, and deserving of the most retched treatment, so too should the parents of these kids... IMO, the mother should be prosecuted for child endangerment by encouraging her children to sleepover and travel with a man who has been dogged by allegations of molesting boys and who had paid millions of dollars to make a prior case go away. A jury would find it much easier to convict her rather than Jackson based on the weak evidence presented bhy the prosecution and questionable motives/history of the boy's mother. Sneddon seemed so convinced and determined to prosecute Jackson that he neglected to bring his case. Can voters recall a DA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Or maybe the mama was looking for a lot of money that never came her way? She definitely p*ssed off the jury. One jury member has since said that he thinks MJ probably has molested young boys, but this case simply did not prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Yeah, the sad part here is that there was evidence...the kids described his "body parts" tell tale marks etc...also, many "eye witnesses" who claim they actually saw it...what are the chances of ALL these people being in on the same plot? The kids also told the cops where he kept the porn, the cops found it and looked for finger prints, which they supposedly found...not sure what evidence people really want here...short of seeing it themselves, and even then some would deny it...frankly, I'd give O.J. the benifit of the doubt before I'd believe Jacko/wacko was innocent...non the less, he will be back in this mess again some day, and no doubt use the same defense. On the doubtful hand...you would think that if he really had a long history of this, then others would be comming out of the wood work to help take him down...unless they were paid etc...frankly, his own words are testimony enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.