sayjann Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 i don't do any i just tell the TRUTH................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayjann Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 'I think most Americans would have lots of "soccer" teams that they hate ......if they knew the name of any of them' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limbo Posted May 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 sayjann said:i don't do any i just tell the TRUTH................ Almost believed you there Sayjann, but just for a nano second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torneyboy Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Sydney Roosters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Zaad said:Ajax is an interesting choice Stevo, especially since they remind me of the Arse regarding style and their great youth academy. A lot of talent "starts" at Ajax, kinda like your club? Care to elaborate? Done deal Limbo Two reasons Zaad. Vitesse are my eredivisie club and Ajax are/were the biggest in the Netherlands and I instinctively don't like the biggest club in any country, so they were ruled out autmatically. However, I would have loved to see the 'total football' they played in the early 70s and the great side they had in the early to mid '90s. I can't seem to find any dvd's from the early 70s that show them. I've only read about them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 OCgringo said:I think most Americans would have lots of "soccer" teams that they hate ......if they knew the name of any of them OC.... Its easy OCgringo: Manchester United worth hating. Trust me on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCgringo Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 OK.... well when anyone asks which soccer team we need to hate , I will tell them that "Manchester United" is the team to hate. now what do I tell them if there is a Manchester not-United OC Hate the Raiders, OK and the Rams too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelseafan Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 I feel Chelsea haven;t done enough to be hated by the sounds of it Anyhow, mine is Liverpool.....for obvious reasons.... p.s. Ballack, Ballack....oh what the hell am I saying, why the frig do we want another midfielder ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Chelseafan maybe you can confirm this but I have heard that Tottenham is hated by Chelsea and West Ham moreso than Arsenal. WHU hates Millwall more than any other club but as far as the bigger London derbies, they hate Tottenham the most. I've also heard Chelsea fans say they hate Tottenham the most. Even more than us. First is that true and second, why? I'd think we'd be the most hated. We've enjoyed having the biggest local support for decades and despite your two titles are considered the biggest club in London, which may not hold much water now, but we were regularly regarded as that and I would think that would make us the most hated. I would have thought us and Fulham would be more hated, maybe even the old Wimbledon. OCgringo, most of the time its Manchester (dis)United anyway. The reason you should hate them is that they were the 'Yankees' of the league in much the same way the Yankees had that arrogance amongst their fans and had people jumping on the bandwagon just to be associated with the name and knowing nothing about them. In fact they and the Yankees have a joing marketing agreement on YesTV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayjann Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 'why the frig do we want another midfielder ?' probably because he cost nothing.........what a shock,Chelsea getting someone for nothing. oh sorry,forgot that he is on £130,000 a Week in wages,that will certainly cost a few bob................ and there are Chelsea telling us that in 2-3 Years they will be self sufficent with the TV money/sponsorship money coming in and will not have to rely on Romans money........ Chelsea should be lucky they are not a PLC and have to explain every £ of business they make instead of letting the owner take the wrap by putting his hand in his pocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.