US Nuclear Charges Fake - Syria

[rogueyam]

Nope, guess again...you clearly didn't understand the question....or did you selectively choose which bits to ignore...?

 

I understood the question and I answered it.

[teddy]

Nope, guess again...you clearly didn't understand the question....or did you selectively choose which bits to ignore...?

 

 

Faustian, you wrongly assume that he is capable of understanding the question when clearly he is not. Why waste your time on this neanderthal

 

I am tired of his presence here, he's like a bad smell and he should be banned.

[rogueyam]

...he should be banned.

 

For what? Name calling?

[Faustian]

No, you are clearly highly prejudiced, your thinking is highly dysfunctional, your understanding of reality is far removed from the rest of the world. You lack any insight into your condition, instead focusing outward, blaming, belittling, condemning and attempting to humiliate others constantly. Woe betide any who challenge your opinions...you lack integrity and honesty and never apologise when wrong...which you often are...do you learn anything?

 

You do realise I'm a shrink by trade and training? Does that make me a lefty? It amuses me that you might think that, as Bush has used psychological 'techniques' throughout his presidency...ok, he hasn't, his speech writers, P.R. and backroom staff have. I doubt he knows about NLP or cognitive dissonance.

 

Actually, you'd make an interesting patient. Although due to the nature of your condition, I suspect you would be untreatable.

 

You come to a monger board, lord it over the politics forum, behave like a troll, never contribute to the main areas of this board...you've been to LOS, you say....when? What did 'whiter than white', 'holier than thou', RY do? Site-see?

[rogueyam]

...your understanding of reality is far removed from the rest of the world.

 

Speaking on behalf of the entire rest of the world, are we? Isn't that what a psychologist might call a "delusion of grandeur"?

[Bangkoktraveler]

From the Guardian.co.uk

May 1, 2008

 

[color:red]The CIA published three aerial photographs last week purporting to show a Syrian nuclear reactor, bombed by Israel last September. But are the pictures all that they seem? Doubts about their authenticity have been raised by Professor William Beeman, head of anthropology at the University of Minnesota, who has had a long involvement with the Middle East.

 

He posted on a Los Angeles Times website a note received from a "colleague with US security clearance" pointing out "irregularities". The unnamed colleague said a picture taken before the bombing looked as if it had been digitally enhanced, noting that the lower part of the building, the annexe and the windows pointing south appeared much sharper than the rest.

 

He also questioned why the alleged reactor had no air defences, no military checkpoints and no powerlines. Turning to two shots of the bombed building, he noted that the first showed a rectangular building and the second a square one. Were they the same building?

 

His note has produced lively and detailed exchanges, involving photo technicians, graphic artists and military analysts past and present, including a specialist in aerial reconnaissance. The basic divide is between those who think it is unpatriotic to question the Bush administration and those suspicious that it is a rerun of 2003, when the administration put out misleading intelligence before the Iraq invasion.

 

Bloggers supportive of the CIA acknowledge that the first picture was digitally enhanced but say that the CIA never claimed last week that it was untouched. As for the discrepancies between pictures two and three, they suggest that the differences between the rectangular shape and the square can be explained by having been taken at different angles.

 

Beeman told the Guardian he did not know one way or another whether there had been a nuclear reactor in the desert, but he had been concerned last week when the administration put out the pictures. "It was so sloppy and obviously doctored," he said.

 

"My friend who watches this material carefully in his capacity as an analyst said, 'This does not add up.'"[/color]

 

[Faustian]

...your understanding of reality is far removed from the rest of the world.

 

Speaking on behalf of the entire rest of the world' date=' are we? Isn't that what a psychologist might call a "delusion of grandeur"?[/quote']

 

No, it's an example of you not understanding english.

 

So having avoided the rest of my prose, how about addressing some of my criticisms..? Display a modicum of integrity. Try it, you might like it.

 

[Faustian]

Well I guess the argument is won on integrity.....

[Bangkoktraveler]

I guess so.