Guest Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Its not looking good fellas (and ladies??). The momentum of this is picking up pace. CABINET DECISION: Anger over midnight closing time Published on Feb 11, 2004 The Cabinet yesterday endorsed a new regulation for a midnight closing time for most entertainment venues, while allowing nightspots in designated zones to stay open two hours longer. After a brief discussion on the proposed regulation, the Cabinet agreed to an earlier decision by a government committee which called for different closing hours for nightspots in different zones, Deputy Interior Minister Pracha Maleenont told reporters yesterday. Owners of night entertainment venues yesterday denounced the decision, labelling it a death sentence for businesses and bad news for tourism. Deputy Prime Minister Purachai Piumsombun?s committee in charge of combating vice at entertainment venues proposed the different closing times on Friday. The new closing times come into effect on March 1. All entertainment venues outside the designated areas, including food shops selling liquor and music, will now have to close at midnight instead of the current 2am. In the designated zones, nightclubs and bars can stay open until 2am, while pubs and discotheques are required to close at 1am. Shops selling khao tom (rice porridge) can stay open all night as they are not covered by the new law, Pracha said. However, the shops must comply with relevant laws, such as the smoking ban at all food outlets. In Bangkok, the zones designated for entertainment venues cover the Patpong area and New Phetchaburi and Ratchadaphisek Roads. The Interior Ministry regulation will be imposed under the Entertainment Venue Act, which came into effect early last month but sets no specific hours for entertainment venues. Pracha voiced concern, however, that entertainmentvenue operators could take legal action against the Cabinet for breach of their constitutional rights. But Purachai told the Cabinet he had no such worry, he said. The deputy interior minister said that personally he believed the same service hours should be applied to all night entertainment venues to allow easier supervision and enforcement for authorities. But the ministry was ready to follow the decision. Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra told the Cabinet yesterday that efficiency of enforcement rather than a possible violation of the Charter should be the main concern, the source said. Somyos Suthangkoon, who heads an association of entertainmentvenue operators, said the early closing time would have a severe impact on most nightspots. Allowing nightclubs and bars to stay open for only three hours a day was ?strange?, compared to eight hours for massage parlours. ?Everybody knows massage parlours is the front for what,? Somyos added. Praphan Pumchaosuan, leader of entertainmentplace owners in the Patpong area, said yesterday that shorter service hours would drive away foreign tourists. The new regulation will take effect in all provinces, except Chiang Mai, Lamphun, Samut Prakan and Uttaradit, where the zones for entertainment places have yet to be designated, deputy government spokeswoman Sansanee Nakapong said yesterday. In the four provinces, the current opening hours will be retained. Praphan Pumchaosuan, leader of bar owners in Patpong, said yesterday shorter service hours would drive away foreign tourists. The new rules will take effect nationwide, except in Chiang Mai, Lamphun, Samut Prakan and Uttaradit, where entertainment zones have yet to be designated. Samatcha Hunsara, Piyanart Srivalo The Nation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 That's it, looking like it is gonna be well screwed up for the short term at least, which I could cancel my trip 4 days after this comes in ! If it is as bad as we fear, then will be my last trip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 "...Shops selling khao tom (rice porridge) can stay open all night as they are not covered by the new law, Pracha said..." "Happy Hippie bar beer and rice porridge...: easy enough to get around... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Whats the difference between a nightclub and a discotheque anyone ??? And is this all being reported anywhere else except for the Nation, not a mention of this or the earlier leaks elsewhere. But I guess we are a little bit early for April fool's arent we ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Pleased to know that there are still optimists out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 There just doesnt appear to be that much detail available, in that last story it does'nt even reference the opening hours or the classifications. I am sure something is going on, but will be interesting to see how this actually pans out. There are many new places with massive investment opening up in Bangkok, all outside the zone, time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Also listed on ThaiVisa.com...can't open the page though...think Bars can close at one, places outside the entertainment zones close at 12...who the hell knows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 So what is the difference between a bar and a pub ? I guess serving rice porridge behind the bar will be the way to go ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 Is the definition of the different classes of entertainment venues deliberate social order ambiguity creeping in again or bad reporting from the Nation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingStarz Posted February 11, 2004 Report Share Posted February 11, 2004 I think probably a bit of both but the standard of repoting on this is apalling, especially as no one else appears to be carrying their own version of the story since the Nation started it last week. Is it me or does something smell a bit weird with this all ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.