Old Hippie Posted April 15, 2007 Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 Well, think about it, we all hate pimps, and people who exploit others right? we condem pimps. But look at the average CEO, who forces pay cuts, steals retirements, intimidates his workers with threats of job loss financial harm etc...he takes all he can from his workers, at their expense...so what is the PHILISOPHICAL difference? Think about it, in many cases, the CEO is the pimp, and we, the workers are the bitches... Example, Airline CEOs at United and American made in excess of 30-40 million, after demanding salary/benifit cuts from workers...we (the ho's) were dumb enough to give them, same as a dumb ho gives her pimp the money...sio really, what is the difference? and why is one socially acceptable, and the other not acceptable? to me, both are scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rchapstick Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 OK Hippy, I'll bite. The difference IMO, is that companies, like UAL and AA, NEED CEO's, while whores do not need pimps. And the companies you mentioned, unfortunately probably needed to make draconian cost cuts in order to simply survive. Equally unfortunate, the 30-40 mill pay package is pretty much the going rate for a CEO of a multi-billion dollar business. Now you CAN argue, that the CEO's in question acted in bad faith, lied, or were otherwise incompetent ... I'd have no basis to argue against that point. But I would argue that there are CEO's that earn their astronomical pay packages, and do so in an ethical manner. We all have bosses, in some shape or form, unless you are living on a kibbutz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Ok, but what is the difference between a Boss who abuses/exploits his employees and a pimp? we are all freee to pick up and go right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rchapstick Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 No difference ... just responding to your characterization of "the average CEO" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Hippie Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 I recall reading there were many similarities in personality, between serial killers, pimps and Corporate CEOs...I might ad politicians to that list as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spirit_of_town_hall Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 I think you have hit the nail on the head. Most if not all are there for a good laugh, easy money and the chance to meet a nice farang who will take care of them. Most of the ones I know blow all their money, not that much gets back to mama. STH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ckrisg Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 OK Hippy, I'll bite. The difference IMO, is that companies, like UAL and AA, NEED CEO's, while whores do not need pimps. And the companies you mentioned, unfortunately probably needed to make draconian cost cuts in order to simply survive. Equally unfortunate, the 30-40 mill pay package is pretty much the going rate for a CEO of a multi-billion dollar business. Now you CAN argue, that the CEO's in question acted in bad faith, lied, or were otherwise incompetent ... I'd have no basis to argue against that point. But I would argue that there are CEO's that earn their astronomical pay packages, and do so in an ethical manner. We all have bosses, in some shape or form, unless you are living on a kibbutz! To survive what planet are you on, cuts = management bonus. No one deserves 30/40 million pay packets and no one CEO on his own contributes that much to a company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbull Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 THai girls lie as much to their Thai husbands/pimps as they do farang; if Thai men actually knew what was going down in the bedrooms with their women we would all be dead! Thais b-girls want face. They get it by either having a young farang with or without money or an older gent with loadsa dosh and a young Thai guy. Not just a question about making face for her but the whole bloody nation. Whole communities which are no part of the b-gal's earlier life will still go out on a limb to help the Thai husband out, giving him a free bed or work so he can be near his wife, etc. Really decent Thais who actually protest will be fed a load of lies about the farang until they desist. This is endemic to life in the country and has really ruined it for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elephant Man Posted December 30, 2007 Report Share Posted December 30, 2007 I think it is a big generalization when making statements about BG's and whether or not they prefer Thai men over Farang, or vice versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooper Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Thats true about lieing about us untill we seem like walking talking snakes I sell womens garments and handbags mainly to europe and some elsewhere but the owner in the clubhouse in my moo barnh told my current girlfriend that in fact i sell Thai women too london which was intresting but extremly dangerous for me because rumours like these get to the men brown like wild fire plus multiply so i end up as Dr.Evil the human traffic demon whoremonger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.