Jump to content

Do Thai Girls Understand Fantasies?


MooNoi

Recommended Posts

>>>>>as concerns Thailand, that's crap (sorry!). Not on account of BG sexual responsiveness, but on account that so many non sex workers would be sincere and not being pragmatic about what a RT with a falang could bring to them.<<<<

 

Well to me, that's crap (sorry!). :: 2nd poster in this thread you have called opinion's 'crap'. It's ok to have different outlooks, P127

 

My post simply said that a girl who is with you for the sex, instead of your money, is more likely to be "'honestly'" freer in her expressions sexually. You are saying that is unlikely in Thailand, because most Thai girl's would only have sex with a farang, if they think they could get something more from them, other than just enjoy themselves. But as you so often state yourself, they are not all conniving scammers? Which is it?

 

I said in my post that I was addressing a small aspect of the topic. Mainly in addressing why some felt non-prostitutes were much more receptive to kinkier sex. These were not girls that were in long-term relationships with. They were referring to casual sex with them, compared to casual sex with a professional paid sex worker. Don't try to read that into every, and all, examples you can think up, including long term relations, etc.

 

HT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Zaad wrote-

You guys must have fucked quite a few of these good girls to come to such strong conclusions

 

This is universal.......applies to gals from all over not just Thais!!!

GS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<Yep, sounds like the typical good girl allright. >>

 

So I am supposed not to use the language of the board which discribes anyone who is not a bar girl as a "GTG" or Good Thai Girl" FAAARRRRKKKKKKKK (that was me this time) of course their NOT good girls if they have fantasies, I mean NO GOOD GIRL could ever have a fantasy, she would go straight to hell,

 

Woops, sorry I thought I was talking to a Catholic Nun, but its you,

 

JB

Another Fantasy, to fuck a nun! If preists can do it, why can't I!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course their NOT good girls if they have fantasies, I mean NO GOOD GIRL could ever have a fantasy, she would go straight to hell,

I actually think they could very well have all sorts of fantasies, but I just don't believe they'd share it with different persons every week.

 

Woops, sorry I thought I was talking to a Catholic Nun, but its you,

:)

 

I think it's better to use bg / non-bg rather than bg / good girl (middle-high-upper class etc.) because what is 'good'? Obviously not that school girl in your example...imo. Perhaps good for you but not good for others.

 

Bg / Non-bg takes all of the possible confusions away. It's simply a fact which nobody needs to question and which seperates the two groups of women that are so often discussed and compared on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what was suggested here was that perhaps NBG(middle-upper class) girls would somehow have had the education & freedom to develop their sexual fantasies moreso than their typical farmer background BG who may have had more lays back in the village & then as working in the city, but hey I'm no expert on the subject, but find it likely & thus I'll throw in a bit of my experiences & statistics...

 

Of all the BG's(100++) I've been had more than once or even been maintaining some sort of relationship with & thus explored widely sexually including eden girls, escorts, BJ shop girls, MP etc. I can't really think of any who was all that kinky or revealed much fantasies.

 

NBG's(10--) in the pure sense on the other hand is quite limited, but they've however somewhat surprised & impressed with their rather kinky sexual behaviour, which have resulted in some firsts for me & thus I'm positively inclined to favor them over time except they're a tad too hard to pick up & later expell than their BG sisters, but so far no regrets or major struggles as e.g. other guys seem to report :cover:;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

said that a girl who is with you for the sex, instead of your money, is more likely to be "'honestly'" freer in her expressions sexually

-------------------------------------

I understand that. Just pointed out that in the case of sex workers, this ain't your pimped out, "next one, please..." type. Just because they had sex with you for money, does not mean that they always have sex for money, or that they don't enjoy a sexual act with another guy. This is not an opinion, BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<I think it's better to use bg / non-bg rather than bg / good girl (middle-high-upper class etc.) because what is 'good'? Obviously not that school girl in your example...imo. Perhaps good for you but not good for others.

 

Bg / Non-bg takes all of the possible confusions away. It's simply a fact which nobody needs to question and which seperates the two groups of women that are so often discussed and compared on this board. >>

 

Good for you, and when you get everyone else to do the some, jolly dood, I'll change,

 

Until then I'll keep doing what every one else does, Barg Girl Vs Good Girl.

 

Personally, I like Whore Vs Good Girls, some of whom are dirtier than Whores though, but that was another thread.

 

JB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what was suggested here was that perhaps NBG(middle-upper class) girls would somehow have had the education & freedom to develop their sexual fantasies moreso than their typical farmer background BG who may have had more lays back in the village & then as working in the city, but hey I'm no expert on the subject,

Neither am I...but I tend to agree with your view on the subject. I just think the 'good girl' description in nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...