MooNoi Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 But how does having their clothes help? What happens if you take a girl back to your hotel who was wearing clothes when you met and she's shaved? Do you send her away again? Or rub some special "GROW-FAST" cream into her crotch area? :grin: Sorry, but Bibblies is right. If theyre naked, you can inspect the merchandise before you take it home. Shaved or not isn't an issue for me, but stretchmarks are. Hard to tell on a lot of girl what's going on in the tummy region when they've got their clothes on. Here's to nude, I say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bibblies Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Who the fuck is this guy 'koow'? ... Rest of the post directed at him, not you MooNoi... "OK....please read this carefully." Oh really? I think you're the one who needs to read carefully. It's you who can't even separate 'showing' and 'shaving' as two separate issues. I mentioned the shaving (a personal preference) simply because it's absurd that the Rawhide show girls are shy* about protecting the "view" because you can't see their genitals anyway with a bush in the way. (*They're not shy really, of course. They simply follow peer pressure. No girl wants to be the one who is not a 'good girl' about that.) "It's important because you heatedly complain about the "lack of showing" millions of times....and you're hoping the bar owners get the message. OK...ready (and this is the absolute truth). If the girls in the bar have no clothes on, and if they are shaved (with will be the case 99% of the time), I will WALK OUT. Who gives a shit? (As I said before, who is this tosser? Does he really think anyone could give a shit that he would walk out? Does he really think that, for every one weirdo who doesn't like to see naked girls in a gogo, there wouldn't be 10 others who would? And could anyone write in a more patronising wankerish way? ) Shaving is very much a side-issue and a personal preference but it is a marker for lewdness and modernity in today's society. Most porn stars will be shaved or somewhat shaved these days so that you can see their sexual organs. Lots of normal girls will be shaved or at least trimmed too. It's a modern trend. I'm guessing that 'koow' is a bit old-fashioned. I'm going to get as many girls as I can shave now just for you, 'koow'. (Truth be told, I already leave a trail behind me. Peppermint #84, Supergirls #43... that's some of my recent handiwork that'll still be in evidence to anyone in Pattaya :grin: ) You can occasionally get some nasty surprises when you get them to shave, I'll give you that, koow. I got one Rawhide girl to shave last year. Lovely girl, cute too. But her fanny was all over the place. Messy, lips hanging down way too far, etc. :thumbdown: Vrey bad kebab. Hey, koow - listen very carefully... It's important... OK...ready (and this is the absolute truth). ... Don't ever go into What's Up A GoGo, Pattaya... You will WALK OUT :grin: Brilliant. A guy comes halfway across the world to fuck a load of whores but gets all uptight about some nudity or seeing some sexual organs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALHOLK Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Brilliant. A guy comes halfway across the world to fuck a load of whores but gets all uptight about some nudity or seeing some sexual organs! Not the first hypocrite to come to Thailand or indeed post on this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasySt Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 I don't care shaved or not. Given a choice I suppose trimmed is the best but there is nothing sexier than naturally trim with those little soft whisps tickling me on the downstroke! Of course having a huge bush is a turn off but I've never seen that in Thailand anyways. Are Thai girls even capable of getting bushy? As in 70's afro bushy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTO Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 He obviously hasn't been to Rawhide lately - hard to find someone who does shave - except for the katoey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooNoi Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 He obviously hasn't been to Rawhide lately - hard to find someone who does shave - except for the katoey You talking about the people on stage, or the punters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Specialist Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Are Thai girls even capable of getting bushy? As in 70's afro bushy.Yes, they are. I've seen it. I'm personally not that fond of a full bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsmedave Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 OK....please read this carefully. It's important because you heatedly complain about the "lack of showing" millions of times....and you're hoping the bar owners get the message. OK...ready (and this is the absolute truth). If the girls in the bar have no pants on, and if the knees are in full view (with will be the case 99% of the time), I will WALK OUT. Because a bare knee. is the ugliest thing in the world to me. But the opposite is the case for a heavy black shroud. In fact, i won't take a girl if i know ahead of time that she has knees....and sometimes i'll ask her ahead of time. But nowadays, almost every single gogo girl is able to bend her legs (and 95% of freelancers). So, if I see that in a gogo, I'm out of there, because they look ALOT BETTER WITH THEIR CLOTHES ON. So, as you might infer from this, our tastes differ (just oh so slightly...ha ha). Am I the only one that hates bendable joints? Maybe on this board i'm the only one, but in the real world i'm sure i'm not. So, my message to bar owners is the opposite of yours (unless they all wear burkas.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koow Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 But how does having their clothes help? CAPS ARE ME: BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE GOOD LOOKING WITH THEIR CLOTHES ON (AND IF THEY DIDN'T SHAVE, WITH THEIR CLOTHES OFF AS WELL...WHICH IS WHAT I SAID IN MY OP, WHERE I USED THE WORD OPPOSITE....I.E., GOOD LOOKERS WILL STILL BE GOOD LOOKERS WITH THEIR CLOTHES OFF, IF THEY DON'T SHAVE). Sorry, but Bibblies is right. If theyre naked, you can inspect the merchandise before you take it home. THAT WAS EXACTLY MY POINT. SHOWING IS GOOD IN THAT I DON'T WASTE MY TIME STAYING THERE. IF THEY'RE SHAVED, I LEAVE BECAUSE I'M NOT INTERESTED. IF THEY'RE NOT SHAVED (AND IF THEY HAPPEN TO BE GOODLOOKING, THEN I MIGHT TAKE ONE). Shaved or not isn't an issue for me, but stretchmarks are. Hard to tell on a lot of girl what's going on in the tummy region when they've got their clothes on. NOONE IS TALKING ABOUT ALL THEIR CLOTHES. WEARING 'BIKINIS' OR UNDERWARE IS JUST AS GOOD AS NUDE FOR THAT PURPOSE. BY USING THE WORD "CLOTHES" BELOW, THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. AS I SAID IN MY OP, IF SHAVED, THEY'RE GROSS WITH THEIR CLOTHES OFF. IF NON-SHAVED, A GOOD LOOKING GIRL WILL STILL BE GOOD-LOOKING WITH ALL HER CLOTHES OFF, AND POSSIBLY BETTER LOOKING THAT WAY. WITH CLOTHES ON, IT JUST MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW...BUT AT LEAST NON OF THEM ARE 'gross' for the shaved reason. (though maybe gross for other reasons). But than that (i.e., other than be able to distinguish the non shavers from the shavers), I could not care less if they're all-nude or not. That is, i'm not obsessed with total nudity as IS "bible". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddy Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Or rub some special "GROW-FAST" cream into her crotch area? :grin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.