ALHOLK Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Israel just shelled a UN Headquarters in Gaza. So we probably are going to have another USS Liberty coverup. Bullshit. Hamas uses U.N. facilities' date=' vehicles, and other resources for terrorism.[/quote'] BULLSHIT. The blocking of food and medicine transports is just a part of their strategy to exterminate the Palasinian people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Hoy Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 BULLSHIT: The Isreali's give daily breaks in the action for three hours so that medical teams can assist injured and that need supplies are dispursed. If the Jews had wanted to exterminate the Palestinians, they could've done so long ago. You must know that, don't you? HH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALHOLK Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 BULLSHIT: The Isreali's give daily breaks in the action for three hours so that medical teams can assist injured and that need supplies are dispursed. If the Jews had wanted to exterminate the Palestinians, they could've done so long ago. You must know that, don't you? HH I do know that and I also have pretty good idea how the Civilized world react. Anyway, my post was a response to Rougeibaby and we all know how receptive he is to real facts and logical reasoning. The Israelis have declared ceasefire for 3 hours a day and I believe it was during one of theese that they shelled a UN convoy. ALHOLK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 UN people at that UN place say that argument is not true. They claim there was no reason for them to be shelled. Are the UN employees all "LIARS' date=' LEFTIST, RETARDS"?[/quote'] Yes, at best, and usually worse. Do you have evidence to support your position? There's new evidence supporting my position coming out of Turtle Bay every day, BT: "To chair the 2009 governing board of the U.N.'s flagship agency, the multibillion-dollar globe-girdling United Nations Development Program, dedicated to promoting good governance and ending poverty, the U.N. has now picked--wait for it--the Islamic Republic of Iran." Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 rogie, did you read that opinion (editorial)? I don't think so. [color:red]Once more I ask you to give proof that the UN headquarters deserved to be shelled.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiHome Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 They are homemade from a truck exhaust pipe filled with some fertilizer/diesel as both the propellant and the payload. Not military equipment at all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qassam_rocket Cheers, SD So you deny that Iran and Syria do not support the terrorist organizations that exacerbate the situation? TH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 So you deny that Iran and Syria do not support the terrorist organizations that exacerbate the situation? Nope. They support them at least in spirit. But with the Israeli blockade (that in itself a legitimate cause for war) over the past two years, not much else is on the table, no matter how much you wish it to be true. The Israelis are nothing if not ruthlessly efficient. And one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter (think of how the current media in Britain would have reported on the events in 1776). Given the Israeli's war-mongering, I don't think the case is so clear here. Cheers, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 News rumors are that the Israelis used depleted uranium in some of their bombs. The Geneva Convention has classified depleted uranium ammunitions as 'illegal weapons of mass destruction' due to their high radioactivity and toxicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted January 23, 2009 Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 Such ammunition is equally deadly to the troops who use it, though it takes longer to kill them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 If the bombs came from the USA, I wonder if the USA may be charged for selling weapons of mass destruction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.