rogueyam Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 lol...Football Williams was down at Parker Center protesting in anger after the verdict when it turned ugly? "It" did not "turn ugly". The ugliness was Football Williams simply being himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 One man's freedom fighter is another man's 'rioting criminal' This is the stupid part. Football Williams dragged a randomly-chosen white person out of his truck and smashed his head in because the dude was white and Williams hates white people. You are glad Williams did this because you are racist too. You call it "freedom fighting" because you are stupid. *********************** RogueYam, Calling board members "stupid" is a flame. Flaming can and will get you banned. Please tone down your posts and desist from your constant flaming in these discussions in the future. This is a warning to you and all others involved in these contentious threads that these threads are being monitored for these infractions of board rules and action will be taken if this persists. Flaming is NOT going to be tolerated! It is an absolute certain way of getting banned from the board. Definition of flaming; an abusive or personally insulting message. This includes insulting or inflaming remarks concerning the character, or personality, of another poster. It also includes innuendos, snide remarks, and any overtly negative connotations towards a fellow board member. You can disagree with a poster's message, but an attack personally on the poster him/herself will result in a deleted post and/or banishment from the board, depending on severity of offense. There are very likely posters on this board with different beliefs than your own. Please respect those beliefs, even if you don't agree with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 One man's freedom fighter is another man's 'rioting criminal' This is the stupid part. Football Williams dragged a randomly-chosen white person out of his truck and smashed his head in because the dude was white and Williams hates white people. You are glad Williams did this because you are racist too. You call it "freedom fighting" because you are stupid. rogie, you did not quote all of what CS wrote. You took his remark out of context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Hmmm...so the Americans that rebelled against the British in the 1770s were wrong? The American Revolutionaries had no institutions through which they could seek redress from their monarch so their revolution was justified. Still, they did not drag innocent civilians out into the streets and smash their heads. You have absolutely nothing here, choco, and your pathetic thrashing about makes you look worse and worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Rogueyam names the one person that was universally vilified and posts as if he was held up as some hero by the masses. It was you who said that the Rodney King riots were "started out by those who felt rightful indignation". That is not "vilification". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Hmmm...so the Americans that rebelled against the British in the 1770s were wrong? The American Revolutionaries had no institutions through which they could seek redress from their monarch so their revolution was justified. Still' date=' they did not drag innocent civilians out into the streets and smash their heads. You have absolutely nothing here, choco, and your pathetic thrashing about makes you look worse and worse.[/quote'] If rogie was a Jew in Natzi Germany and they came for him, rogie would not want the people to rebel back against the injustice. rogie would put up no resistance. Is that right rogie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogueyam Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 RougueYam Flaming is NOT tolerated! It is an absolute certain way of getting banned from the board. Definition of flaming; an abusive or personally insulting message. This includes insulting or inflaming remarks concerning the character, or personality, of another poster. It also includes innuendos, snide remarks, and any overtly negative connotations towards a fellow board member. You can disagree with a poster's message, but an attack personally on the poster him/herself will result in a deleted post and/or banishment from the board, depending on severity of offense. There are very likely posters on this board with different beliefs than your own. Please respect those beliefs, even if you don't agree with them. -Board Moderator- I am of course aware that flaming is a violation of board rules. However it is a plain fact that there is a not-insignificant amount of flaming that goes on here and I am not the only guilty party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Bullshit. No one is entitled to perfect institutions. Why not? You must hate the USA if you feel that we cannot offer the best to our citizens. You, and people with your attitude, disgust me. And I mean that sincerely, not just a BS posting on a message board. Regards, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunsanuk Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Hi, RY, I've just about had it with your crap. It is obvious your only reason on this board is to spout your right-wing crap and cause problems, so time for you to leave I think. Sanuk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.. Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Hmmm...so the Americans that rebelled against the British in the 1770s were wrong? The American Revolutionaries had no institutions through which they could seek redress from their monarch so their revolution was justified. Still' date=' they did not drag innocent civilians out into the streets and smash their heads. You have absolutely nothing here, choco, and your pathetic thrashing about makes you look worse and worse.[/quote'] LIAR, FALSE! They indeed did have avenues to seek redress (however corrupt they may have been). And they did kill "innocent" civilians. Look up "tar-and-feathered" for example... Cheers, SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.