Obstacles Facing Thai Reconciliation

[Mekong]

Which brings me back to a previous post I got flamed for.

 

In USA the indigenous "Native Americans" were governed by the European White Faces ACCEPTABLE

 

In Australia the indigenous "Aboriginals" were governed by the European White Faces ACCEPTABLE

 

In New Zealand the indigenous "Maoris" were governed by the European White Faces ACCEPTABLE.

 

In Thailand the indigenous "Thais" (whoever they may be) are governed by the "Teochew Chinese" and its called oppression.

 

 

[Pom Michael]

"When Dissent Is Criminalized"

 

Robert Amsterdam is doing a great job for Thaksin - don't ya think?

 

I'm sure that essay cost about 100,000 USD!

 

 

[Pom Michael]

"When Dissent Is Criminalized"

 

Robert Amsterdam is doing a great job for Thaksin - don't ya think?

 

I'm sure that essay cost about 100,000 USD!

 

 

[chuckwoww]

He's very clever. I bet the farang tosser wishes he could afford his services. I'd like to hear his defence of Mr. Savage....something about well-meaning, misguided and swept up by events probably.

[SpiceMan]

"When Dissent Is Criminalized"

 

Robert Amsterdam is doing a great job for Thaksin - don't ya think?

 

I'm sure that essay cost about 100,000 USD!

 

Yes I thought it was well written and persuasive.

[Coss]

Which brings me back to a previous post I got flamed for.

 

In New Zealand the indigenous "Maoris" were governed by the European White Faces ACCEPTABLE.

 

 

You have to remember that the majority of Maori represented by their chiefs, signed a treaty (good or bad) with the (evil white fascist oppressor colonialist) British.

 

Prior to that there were about half the Maori fighting with the (evil white fascist oppressor colonialist) British against the "about", other half of Maori, in the Maori wars.

 

Not flaming here, but to get equivalency of the argument, the Thais would have had to sign a treaty with the Chinese.

 

And the "(evil white fascist oppressor colonialist) British" is me being facetious.

 

Cheers

 

Coss

 

 

[Guest lazyphil]

<>

 

 

on topic but off principle one. south africans, for some reason got used as the whipping boy for what whites did/were doing elsewhere, must have irked the hell out of them getting lectured by the white liberal elite of the USA at the time of aparthied era. oh well.

[chuckwoww]

Ja man, especially as the white liberal elite were responding to pressure from kaffirs.

[Guest lazyphil]

had enough whites swamped south africa and out numbered the blacks (as was done elsewhere) white MAJORITY rule wouldn't have been deemed cruel and unfair.....white minority rule was the buzz expression back then. evil, cruel, tyranilcal etc....send enough and it would have been nation building.

 

can you imagine navajos attacking white farms in arizona and killing the farmers??....no, they're cute little brown folk that get named after football teams, some even have casinos on the reservation......well and truely pacified. not the the upity blacks on the velt.

[chuckwoww]

Yeah but whites didn't make very good cheap labour. There was a big pool of that right on the doorstep. Not to mention coloureds and Asians especially after the British started having trouble in India. Didn't Gandhi get his start in South africa?