Flashermac Posted January 2, 2013 Report Share Posted January 2, 2013 Yep, the legal spouse (even if common law) should be responsible. When I was a teen, we had a nympho neighbour who divorced her husband to live with her lover. Her lover knocked her up, and she went to court to ask for child support form her ex. The judge looked her in the eye and pointed at her ex-husband. "Is that man the father of this child?" She admitted he wasn't, though she had still been married to him at the time of conception. The judge rapped the gavel and said "case dismissed". Then he called her lawyer over and chewed him out. In Kansas the judge might have given it to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 Yep, the legal spouse (even if common law) should be responsible. When I was a teen, we had a nympho neighbour who divorced her husband to live with her lover. Her lover knocked her up, and she went to court to ask for child support form her ex. The judge looked her in the eye and pointed at her ex-husband. "Is that man the father of this child?" She admitted he wasn't, though she had still been married to him at the time of conception. The judge rapped the gavel and said "case dismissed". Then he called her lawyer over and chewed him out. In Kansas the judge might have given it to her. Blood test would have cleared the matter. I knew a guy who got a girl knocked up. She went to the court and got a court order for him to show up and give a blood test. The blood was given, he failed the test and the guy was off the hook. He had his friend who looked like him show up and he gave the blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 ...and the lady didn't know the difference with the friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 Lots of fruitcakes roaming the web. "These elite can afford high-tech security systems, bullet-proof vehicles and bodyguards, whose guns will not be sought, but they want the common man’s. Why is gun control vitally important to them? It’s a tried and true formula that worked for Stalin, Hitler and Mao to control the masses. Why bring up communists? Communistic-socialist ideas work for rich and powerful Americans, who are mainly counterfeit-Jewish. Actually, they are Atheist Marxists but call themselves Jewish. These “fake†Jews originate from Khazaria and went to Russia and its surrounding areas, as did Feinstein’s grandparents, immigrating from Poland and Russia to the U.S. Jews, like them, were told by the Sanhedrin to migrate to the U.S. and make their children doctors, lawyers and politicians to eventually destroy the Christians. Her father, Leon Goldman, became a renowned surgeon. Fake Jews also have instructions through “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion†to obtain control through the judiciary, banking, real-estate, media and politics, which most of them own companies in all areas addressed in these protocols." LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashermac Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 Nothing new in that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 Sadly, some weak minds believe all of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkoktraveler Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 ...and the lady didn't know the difference with the friend The guy's friend had the blood drawn. Back the women were never present; I don't even think they are present today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainsdrifter Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 Sadly, some weak minds believe all of that. Yes, very sad. I would venture that because of these sad misguided beliefs, we are all at risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unit731 Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 ABC’s Elizabeth Hartfield and Sarah Parnass report: "It’s only his second day of his retirement, and already Barney Frank wants back in the game. The former Mass congressman confirmed on Friday morning that he’s interested in the interim appointment to fill John Kerry’s Senate seat. “A month ago, a few weeks ago in fact I said I wasn’t interested,†Frank said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe†Friday. “But that deal now means that February, March and April are going to be among the most important months in American financial economy.†Frank was referring to the agreement passed in the House and Senate this week that puts America past the so-called fiscal cliff, but left the automatic spending cuts associated with the sequester slated to take shape on March 1. Another Congressional head-to-head is expected in the coming months over those cuts, and Frank said he wants to be part of that fight." LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavanami Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 What kills more??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now